Skip to content
2018
Volume 44, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1943-3050
  • E-ISSN:
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/elq202131365
2021-08-01
2024-02-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beers G. K. Probst R. E (2017) Disrupting thinking: Why how we read matters Scholastic.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. David J. L (2011) Research says … high-stakes testing narrows the curriculum. Educational Leadership, 68, (6), 78–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dougherty S. M. Weiner J. M (2019) The Rhode to turnaround: The impact of waivers to No Child Left Behind on school performance. Educational Policy, 334, 555–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Duke N. Pearson P. D (2011) Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Farstrup A., Samuels S. Eds What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed.). 205–42 International Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Elish-Piper L. Matthews M. W. Risko V. J (2013) Invisibility: An unintended consequence of standards, tests, and mandates. Journal of Language and Literacy Education [Online], 92, 4–23. http://jolle.coe.uga.edu
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher D. Frey N (2013) Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility.2nd ed ASCD.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gallagher K. Kittle P (2018) Giving students the right kind of writing practice. Educational Leadership, 757, 14–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Guskey T. R. Yoon K. S (2009) What works in professional development?. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 495–500 10.1177/003172170909000709
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanks L (2019) Improving teacher effectiveness for increasing student reading proficiency through a talent management professional development model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Hood College Frederick, MD http://mdsoar.org/ handle/11603/14407
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Harvey S. Goudvis A (2017) Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement: Grades K–8.3rd rev. ed Stenhouse Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rasinski T (2006) Reading fluency instruction: Moving beyond accuracy, automaticity, and prosody. The Reading Teacher, 59, (7), 704–706.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schmoker M (2019) Feb 27 The problem with literacy programs, http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2019/02/20/the-problem-with-literacy-programs.html
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Shanahan T. Shanahan C (2008) Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 781, 40–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wiggins G. P. McTighe J (2005) Understanding by design.2nd ed ASCD.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/elq202131365
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error