Skip to content
2018
Volume 115, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0013-8274
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8895

Abstract

This column examines how the writing workshop model can counter AI shortcuts by shifting educators from stances of fear and detection to one of intentional design, protecting student voice and inviting generative AI only as a rubric-aligned thought partner that deepens reflection rather than replacing it.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ej20261153110
2026-01-01
2026-06-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Magliozzi, D., & Peterson, K. (2025) AI in the writing workshop: Finding the write balance. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Nash, B. (2025) You can have it both ways: Teaching with and against generative AI. English Journal, 115(1), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej2025115198
    [Google Scholar]
  3. SchoolAI (2025) Sidekick. [Large language model] https://schoolai.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Walsh, J. D. (2025, May7). Everyone is cheating their way through college. New York Magazine. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/openaichatgpt-ai-cheating-education-collegestudents-school.html
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/ej20261153110
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ej20261153110
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test