Close Reading for the Twenty-First Century: Rehumanizing Literary Reading

References

1. Brooks C. (1995) Afterword: An interview with Cleanth Brooks. In Spurlin W. J. & Fischer M. (Eds.), The New Criticism and contemporary literary theory (pp. 365–383). Garland Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Culler J. (2010) The closeness of close reading. ADE Bulletin, 149, 20–25.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Gallop J. (2000) The ethics of reading: Close encounters. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 16(3), 7–17.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gallop J. (2010) Close reading in 2009. ADE Bulletin, 149, 15–19.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Guillory J. (2025) On close reading. University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Handsfield L. J., & Valente P. (2021) Pedagogies of closeness: Humanizing small-group comprehension instruction. Language Arts, 98(4), 201–207.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hayles N. K. (2010) How we read: Close, hyper, machine. ADE Bulletin, 150, 62–79.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kidd D. C., & Castano E. (2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Moretti F. (2000) Conjectures on world literature. New Left Review, 1, 54–68.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Morrison T. (1977) Song of Solomon. Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Moya P. M. (2016) The social imperative: Race, close reading, and contemporary literary criticism. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Rabinowitz P. J. (1992) Against close reading. In Kecht M. (Ed.), Pedagogy is politics: Literary theory and critical teaching (pp. 230–243). University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Rabinowitz P. J., & Bancroft C. (2014) Euclid at the core: Recentering literary education. Style, 48(1), 1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Rejan A. (2017) Reconciling Rosenblatt and the New Critics: The quest for an “experienced understanding” of literature. English Education, 50(1), 10–41.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Richards I. A. (1929) Practical criticism. Harcourt Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Rosenblatt L. M. (1978) The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Schuessler J. (2017, October 30). Reading by the numbers: When big data meets literature. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/arts/franco-moretti-stanford-literary-lab-big-data.html
    [Google Scholar]
18. Smagorinsky P. (2017) Discussion, conversation, and dialogue: Applebee, Bakhtin, and speech in school. In Durst R. K., Newell G. E., & Marshall J. D. (Eds.), English language arts research and teaching: Revisiting and extending Arthur Applebee’s contributions (pp. 27–40). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Smith M. W., Appleman D., & Wilhelm J. D. (2014) Uncommon core: Where the authors of the standards go wrong about instruction and how you can get it right. Corwin.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Storm S. (2020) Black words matter: Bending literary close reading toward justice. In Dyches J., Sams B., & Boyd A. (Eds.), Acts of resistance: Subversive teaching in the English language arts classroom (pp. 7–21). Myers Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Warren R. P. (1976) A conversation with Cleanth Brooks. In Simpson L. P. (Ed.), The possibilities of order: Cleanth Brooks and his work (pp. 1–127). Louisiana State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]