oa Teaching English in the “Science of Reading” Era: We Teach English in Times of Perpetual Crisis: For All ELA Teachers, “the Time Is Always Now”

References

1. Aydarova E. (2023) “Whatever you want to call it”: Science of reading mythologies in the education reform movement. Harvard Educational Review, 93(4), 556–581. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.556
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baldwin J. (1992) Nobody knows my name. Vintage.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carnine D. (2024, June 4). New initiative is creating evidence-based guidelines for educators. The 74. https://www.the74million.org/article/new-initiative-is-creating-evidence-based-guidelines-for-educators/
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chaffin M., Riesco H. S., Hackett-Hill K., Collet V., Grizzle M. Y., & Warren J. (2023) “Phonics monkeys” and “real life reading”: Heteroglossic views of a state reading initiative. Literacy Research and Instruction, 63(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2023.2271085
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cushing I. (2024a) Social in/justice and the deficit foundations of oracy. Oxford Review of Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2311134
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cushing I. (2024b) Tiered vocabulary and raciolinguistic discourses of deficit: From academic scholarship to education policy. Language and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2024.2308824
   [Google Scholar]
7. Edling S. (2015) Between curriculum complexity and stereotypes: Exploring stereotypes of teachers and education in media as a question of structural violence. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.20l4.956796
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ham F., & Healy K. (2023, December 18). Cost of reading mandate could top $100 million in 2024-5. CT Examiner. https://ctexaminer.com/2023/12/18/cost-of-reading-mandate-could-top-100-million-in-2024-5/
   [Google Scholar]
9. Khan F., Peoples L. Q., & Foster L. (2022) Lessons in (in)equity: An evaluation of cultural responsiveness in elementary ELA curriculum. Education Justice Research and Organizing Collaborative; New York University Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools. https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/2022-10/Lessons%20in%20%28In%29Equity%20FINAL%20ACCESSIBLE.10.31.22.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
10. LaBrant L. (1947) Research in language. Elementary English, 24(2), 86–94. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41383425
    [Google Scholar]
11. Martin W. (1982, November). The guardians who slumbereth not. Texas Monthly. https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/the-guardians-who-slumbereth-not/
    [Google Scholar]
12. Public Opinion Strategies & Impact Research (2023, October). Reading education messaging. https://8ce82b94a8c4fdc3ea6d-b1d233e3bc3cb10858bea65ff05e18f2.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/87/5b/77b18be54e5d98a6f2e8cebccdd3/impact-wff-parents-poll-findings.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
13. Reinking D., Hruby G. G., & Risko V. J. (2023) Legislating phonics: Settled science or political polemics? Teachers College Record, 125(1), 104–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681 231155688
    [Google Scholar]
14. Rigell A., Banack A., Maples A., Laughter J., Broemmel A., Vines N., & Jordan J. (2022, November). Overwhelming whiteness: A critical analysis of race in a scripted reading curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(6), 852–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2022.2030803
    [Google Scholar]
15. Thomas P. L. (2022a) How to end the reading war and serve the literacy needs of all students: A primer for parents, policy makers, and people who care (2nd ed.). Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Thomas P. L. (2022b) The science of reading movement: The never-ending debate and the need for a different approach to reading instruction. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/science-of-reading
    [Google Scholar]