oa Teaching English in the “Science Of Reading” Era: We Teach English in Times of Perpetual Crisis: The Media Continue to Misread Teaching Reading and Literacy

References

1. Allington R. L (2019) The hidden push for phonics legislation. Tennessee Literacy Journal, 7(1), 7–20.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aydarova E. (2023) “Whatever you want to call it”: Science of reading mythologies in the education reform movement. Harvard Educational Review, 93(4) 556—581, https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.556
   [Google Scholar]
3. Elliott J. G, & Grigorenko E. L (2024) Dyslexia in the twenty-first century: A commentary on the IDA definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 74, 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-024-00311-0
   [Google Scholar]
4. Garan E. M (2001) Beyond the smoke and mirrors: A critique of the National Reading Panel report on phonics. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(7), 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170108200705
   [Google Scholar]
5. Hanford E. Host (n.d.). Sold a story [Audio podcast]. APM Reports. https://features.apmreports.org/sold-a-story/
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hanford E. (2017, September 11). Hard to read: How American schools fail kids with dyslexia. APM Reports. https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2017/09/11/hard-to-read
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hanford E. (2018, September 10). Hard words: Why aren’t kids being taught to read? APM Reports. https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2018/09/10/hard-words-why-american-kidsarent-being-taught-to-read
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hoffman J. V, Hikida M., & Sailors M. (2020) Contesting science that silences: Amplifying equity, agency, and design research in literacy teacher preparation. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S255–S266. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.353
   [Google Scholar]
9. Johnston P., & Scanlon D. (2021) An examination of dyslexia research and instruction with policy implications. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 70(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377211024625
   [Google Scholar]
10. Krashen S. (2002) Whole language and the great plummet of 1987-92. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 748–753.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kristof N. (2023, February 11). Two-thirds of kids struggle to read, and we know how to fix it. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/11/opinion/reading-kids-phonics.html
    [Google Scholar]
12. National Council of Teachers of English (2015, February 28). Resolution on mandatory grade retention and high-stakes testing. https://ncte.org/statement/grade-retention/
    [Google Scholar]
13. Reinking D., Hruby G. G, & Risko V. J (2023) Legislating phonics: Settled science or political polemics? Teachers College Record, 725(1), 104–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681231155688
    [Google Scholar]
14. Seidenberg M. S, Cooper Borkenhagen M., & Kearns D. M (2020) Lost in translation? Challenges in connecting reading science and educational practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S119–S130. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.341
    [Google Scholar]
15. Spiegel D. L (1998) Silver bullets, babies, and bath water: Literature response groups in a balanced literacy program. The Reading Teacher, 52(2), 114–124. www.jstor.org/stable/20202025
    [Google Scholar]
16. Stephens D. (2008) The federal government wants me to teach what? A teacher’s guide to the National Reading Panel report. National Council of Teachers of English. https://cdn.ncte.org/nctefiles/resources/newsletter/magazine/nrp_report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
17. Thomas P. L (2022) The science of reading movement: The neverending debate and the need for a different approach to reading instruction. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/science-of-reading
    [Google Scholar]
18. Thomas P. L (2023a, August 11). A critical examination of grade retention as reading policy (OEA). Radical Scholarship. https://radicalscholarship.com/2022/09/15/a-critical-examination-of-grade-retention-as-reading-policy-oea/
    [Google Scholar]
19. Thomas P. L (2023b, June). NEPC review: Teacher prep review: Strengthening elementary reading instruction (National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ), June 2023). National Education Policy Center. https://nepc.colorado.edu/review/teacher-prep
    [Google Scholar]
20. Tierney R. J, & Pearson P. D (2021) A history of literacy education: Waves of research and practice. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Yaden D. B Jr., Reinking D., & Smagorinsky P. (2021) The trouble with binaries: A perspective on the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S119–S129, https://doi.org10.1002/rrq.402
    [Google Scholar]
22. Yatvin J. (2000, February 27). Minority view. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/minorityView.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
23. Yatvin J. (2002) Babes in the woods: The wanderings of the National Reading Panel. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(5), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208300509
    [Google Scholar]
24. Yatvin J. (2003, April 30). I told you so! The misinterpretation and misuse of the National Reading Panel report. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2003/04/30/33yatvin.h22.html
    [Google Scholar]
25. THOMAS P. L., professor of education (Furman University) and member of NCTE for over 20 years, taught high school English for 18 years in South Carolina before moving to teacher education and teaching first-year writing. He is author of How to End the Reading War and Serve the Literacy Needs of All Students: A Primer for Parents, Policy Makers, and People Who Care. Follow him at https://radicalscholarship.com/ and @plthomasEdD. He can be reached at [email protected].
    [Google Scholar]