oa Teaching English in the “Science of Reading” Era: We Teach English in Times of Perpetual Crisis: Selling a Story of Reading

References

1. Allington R. L. (2019, fall). The hidden push for phonics legislation. Tennessee Literacy Journal, 1(1), 7–20.
   [Google Scholar]
2. American Statistical Association (2014, April 8). ASA statement on using value-added models for educational assessment. https://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/POL-ASAVAM-Statement.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aukerman M. (2022a, November 23). The science of reading and the media: Is reporting biased? Literacy Research Association. https://literacyresearchassociation.org/stories/the-science-of-reading-and-the-media-is-reporting-biased/
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aukerman M. (2022b, December 7). The science of reading and the media: Does the media draw on high-quality reading research? Literacy Research Association. https://literacyresearchassociation.org/stories/the-science-of-reading-and-the-media-does-the-media-draw-on-high-quality-reading-research/
   [Google Scholar]
5. Aukerman M. (2022c, December 14). The science of reading and the media: How do current reporting patterns cause damage? Literacy Research Association. https://literacyresearchassociation.org/stories/the-science-of-reading-and-the-media-how-do-current-reporting-patterns-cause-damage/
   [Google Scholar]
6. Aydarova E. (2023) “Whatever you want to call it”: Science of reading mythologies in the education reform movement. Harvard Educational Review, 93 (4), 556–581. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.556
   [Google Scholar]
7. Berliner D. C., & Biddle B. J. (1995) The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bessie A. (2010, October 15). The myth of the bad teacher. Truthout. https://truthout.org/articles/the-myth-of-the-bad-teacher/
   [Google Scholar]
9. Coles G. (2019, summer). Cryonics phonics: Inequality’s little helper. New Politics, 17 (3). https://newpol.org/issue_post/cryonics-phonics-inequalitys-little-helper/
   [Google Scholar]
10. Edling S. (2015) Between curriculum complexity and stereotypes: Exploring stereotypes of teachers and education in media as a question of structural violence. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2O14.956796
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goodman K. S. (1967) Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6 (4), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388076709556976
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hanford E. Host (nd Sold a story [Audio podcast]. APM Reports. https://features.apmreports.org/sold-a-story/
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hanford E. (2018, September 10). Hard words: Why aren’t kids being taught to read? APM Reports. https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2018/09/10/hard-words-why-american-kidsarent-being-taught-to-read
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hanford E. (2019, December 5). There is a right way to teach reading, and Mississippi knows it. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/05/opinion/mississippi-schools-naep.html
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hoffman J. V., Hikida M., & Sailors M. (2020) Contesting science that silences: Amplifying equity, agency, and design research in literacy teacher preparation. Reading Research Quarterly, 55 (S1), S255–S266. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.353
    [Google Scholar]
16. LaBrant L. (1947, January). Research in language. Elementary English, 24 (2), 86–94. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41383425
    [Google Scholar]
17. Loveless T. (2016, June 13). The NAEP proficiency myth. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2016/06/13/the-naep-proficiency-myth/
    [Google Scholar]
18. Loveless T. (2023, June 11). Literacy and NAEP proficient. Tom Loveless. https://tomloveless.com/posts/literacy-and-naep-proficient/
    [Google Scholar]
19. Malchow H. (2014, July). Structured literacy: A new term to unify us and sell what we do. International Dyslexia Association. https://dyslexiaida.org/ida-approach/
    [Google Scholar]
20. Maroun J., & Tienken C. H. (2024) The pernicious predictability of state-mandated tests of academic achievement in the United States. Education Sciences, 14 (2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020129
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mora J. K. (2023, July 3). To cue or not to cue: Is that the question? Language Magazine. https://www.languagemagazine.com/2023/07/03/to-cue-or-not-to-cue-is-that-the-question/
    [Google Scholar]
22. National Center for Education Statistics (2021, December 9). Scale scores and NAEP achievement levels. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/guides/scores_achv.aspx#achievement
    [Google Scholar]
23. National Council of Teachers of English (2015, February 28). Resolution on mandatory grade retention and high-stakes testing. https://ncte.org/statement/grade-retention/
    [Google Scholar]
24. North American Trainers Group (2022, December 13). Understanding MSV: The types of information available to readers. Reading Recovery. https://readingrecovery.org/understanding-msv-the-types-of-information-available-to-readers/
    [Google Scholar]
25. Reinking D., Hruby G. G., & Risko V. J. (2023) Legislating phonics: Settled science or political polemics? Teachers College Record, 125 (1), 104–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681231155688
    [Google Scholar]
26. Rosenberg B. (2004, May). What’s proficient? The No Child Left Behind Act and the many meanings of proficiency. American Federation of Teachers. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED497886.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
27. Semingson P., & Kerns W. (2021) Where is the evidence? Looking back to Jeanne Chall and enduring debates about the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56 (S1), S157–S169. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.405
    [Google Scholar]
28. Thomas P. L. (2012) Ignoring poverty in the US: The corporate takeover of public education. Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Thomas P. L. (2016) Miracle schools or political scam? In Mathis W. J. & Trujillo T. M. (Eds.), Learning from the federal market-based reforms: Lessons for the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) (pp. 223–232). Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Thomas P. L. (2022, September). The science of reading movement: The never-ending debate and the need for a different approach to reading instruction. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/science-of-reading
    [Google Scholar]
31. Thomas P. L. (2023, June). A critical examination of grade retention as reading policy (OEA). Radical Scholarship. https://radicalscholarship.com/2022/09/15/a-critical-examination-of-grade-retention-as-reading-policy-oea/
    [Google Scholar]
32. Thomas P. L., Porfilio B. J., Gorlewski J., & Carr P. R. Eds. (2014) Social context reform: A pedagogy of equity and opportunity. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Weber Mark [@jerseyjazzman] (2023, September 23). When did “Sold a Story” become a holy text? [Post]. X. https://X.com/jerseyjazzman/status/1705588539432358159?s=20
    [Google Scholar]