f “What Would Other Swifties Think?”: Multimodal Composing with Communities in Mind

References

1. Applebee A. N., & Langer J. A. (2011) A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100 (6), 14–27.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Clark I. L., & Hernandez A. (2011) Genre awareness, academic argument, and transferability. The WAC Journal, 22, 65–78.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cope B., & Kalantzis M. (2021) Pedagogies for digital learning: From transpositional grammar to the literacies of education. In Sindoni M. G. & Moschini I. (Eds.), Multimodal literacies across digital learning contexts (pp. 34–54). Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Hinchman K. A., & O’Brien D. G. (2019) Disciplinary literacy: From infusion to hybridity. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(4), 525–536.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Hull G. A., & Nelson M. E. (2005) Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22 (2), 224–261.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Jones K., & Storm S. (2022) Sustaining textual passions: Teaching with texts youth love. Journal of Literacy Research, 54 (4), 458–479.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Lave J., & Wenger E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Lim F. V., & Toh W. (2020) Children’s digital multimodal composing: Implications for learning and teaching. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(4), 422–432.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Magnifico A. M., Woodard R., & McCarthey S. (2019) Teachers as co-authors of student writing: How teachers’ initiating texts influence response and revision in an online space. Computers and Composition, 52, 107–131.
   [Google Scholar]
10. New London Group (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1), 60–92.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Rubin D. L. (1998) Chapter II: Writing for readers: The primacy of audience in composing. Teachers College Record, 99 (6), 53–73.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Smith B. E. (2018) Composing for affect, audience, and identity: Toward a multidimensional understanding of adolescents’ multimodal composing goals and designs. Written Communication, 35(2), 182–214.
    [Google Scholar]