f We Teach English in Times of Perpetual Crisis: The Long (and Tedious) History of Reading Crisis

References

1. Aydarova E. (2023) “Whatever you want to call it”: Science of reading mythologies in the education reform movement. Harvard Educational Review, 93(4), 556–581.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baêta S., & Meehan K. (n.d.). Spineless shelves: Two years of book banning. PEN America. pen.org/spineless-shelves/
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berliner D. C., & Biddle B. J. (1999) The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Basic Books.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Betts E. A., Dolch E. W., Gates A. I., Gray W. S., Horn E., LaBrant L., Roberts H., Smith D. V., Smith N. B., & Witty P. (1942) What shall we do about reading today? A symposium. The Elementary English Review, 19(7), 225–256.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bowers J. S. (2020) Reconsidering the evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative methods of reading instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 681–705.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chall J. S. (1996) Learning to read: The great debate. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Darling-Hammond L. (1997) Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED415183.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
8. Edling S. (2015) Between curriculum complexity and stereotypes: Exploring stereotypes of teachers and education in media as a question of structural violence. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 399–415.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Flesch R. (1955) Why Johnny can’t read: And what you can do about it. William Morrow Paperbacks.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Garan E. M. (2001) Beyond the smoke and mirrors. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(7), 500–506.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hanford E. (2018, September 10). Hard words: Why aren’t kids being taught to read? APM Reports. https://www.apmreports.org/story/2018/09/10/hard-words-why-american-kids-arent-being-taught-to-read
    [Google Scholar]
12. Krashen S. (2002a) Defending whole language: The limits of phonics instruction and the efficacy of whole language instruction. Reading Improvement, 39(1), 32–42.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Krashen S. (2002b) Whole language and the great plummet of 1987-92. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 748–753.
    [Google Scholar]
14. LaBrant L. (1947) Research in language. Elementary English, 24(2), 86–94.
    [Google Scholar]
15. LaBrant L. (1951) We teach English. Harcourt, Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
16. McQuillan J. (1998) The literary crisis: False claims, real solutions. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Miller H. R. (1942) The war, grammar, and hocus pocus. The Elementary English Review, 19(7), 257–258.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Preston T. (2022) A look back: A chronicle of Kappan ’s coverage of the reading wars. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(8), 5–7.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Reinking D., Hruby G. G., & Risko V. J. (2023) Legislating phonics: Settled science or political polemics? Teachers College Record, 125(1), 104–131.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Semingson P., & Kerns W. (2021) Where is the evidence? Looking back to Jeanne Chall and enduring debates about the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S157–S169.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Shanahan T. (2003) Research-based reading instruction: Myths about the National Reading Panel report. The Reading Teacher, 56 (7), 646–655.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Shanahan T. (2005) The National Reading Panel report: Practical advice for teachers. Learning Point Associates. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489535.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
23. Stephens D. (2008) The federal government wants me to teach what? A teacher’s guide to the National Reading Panel report. National Council of Teachers of English. https://cdn.ncte.org/nctefiles/resources/newsletter/magazine/nrp_report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
24. Thomas P. L. (2022a) How to end the reading war and serve the literacy needs of all students: A primer for parents, policy makers, and people who care. Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Thomas P. L. (2022b, September). The science of reading movement: The never-ending debate and the need for a different approach to reading instruction. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/science-of-reading
    [Google Scholar]
26. US Department of Health and Human Services (2000) National Reading Panel publications. www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/report
    [Google Scholar]
27. Wilde J. (2004, January). Definitions for the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Scientifically-based research. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED484304.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
28. Williams B. T. (2007) Why Johnny can never, ever read: The perpetual literacy crisis and student identity. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(2), 178–182.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Yatvin J. (2002) Babes in the woods: The wanderings of the National Reading Panel. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(5), 364–369.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Yatvin J. (2003, April 30). I told you so! The misinterpretation and misuse of the National Reading Panel report. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2003/04/30/33yatvin.h22.html
    [Google Scholar]