Asking Questions and Speculating about Texts: Socially Annotating Shakespeare

References

1. Allred Johnny B., et al. “‘I Love This Insight, Mary Kate!’: Social Annotation across Two ELA Methods Classes.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 20, no. 2 2020, pp 230–41.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Applebee Arthur N., et al. “Discussion-Based Approaches to Developing Understanding: Classroom Instruction and Student Performance in Middle and High School English.” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 40, no. 3 2003, pp 685–730.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beach Richard. “Constructing Digital Learning Commons in the Literacy Classroom.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, vol. 55, no. 5 2012, pp 448–51.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Fisher Douglas, and Frey Nancy. “Raise Reading Volume through Access, Choice, Discussion, and Boo Talks.” The Reading Teacher, vol. 72, no. 1 2018, pp 89–97.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Larson Lotta C. “Reader Response Meets New Literacies: Empowering Readers in Online Learning Communities.” The Reading Teacher, vol. 62, no. 8 2009, pp 638–48.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Melly Christina. “‘Can We Blog about This?’: Amplifying Student Voice in Secondary Language Arts.” English Journal, vol. 107, no. 3 2018, pp 12–18.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Mirra Nicole, and Garcia Antero. “‘I Hesitate but I Do Have Hope’: Youth Speculative Civic Literacies for Troubled Times.” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 90, no. 2 2020, pp 295–321.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Muhammad Gholdy. Cultivating Genius: An Equity Framework for Culturally and Historically Responsive Literacy. Scholastic 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
9. O’Byrne W. Ian, et al. “Digital Wildfires: Tending to Social Media in the ELA Classroom.” Bringing Critical Media Literacy into ELA Classrooms edited by Christel Mary and Kist William, National Council of Teachers of English 2022, pp 19–26. Vol. 2 of Critical Media Literacy.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Polleck Jody, and Spence-Davis Tashema. “Centering #Black LivesMatter to Confront Injustice, Inspire Advocacy, and Develop Literacies.” English Journal, vol. 109, no. 4 2020, pp 87–94.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Porter-O’Donnell Carol. “Beyond the Yellow Highlighter: Teaching Annotation Skills to Improve Reading Comprehension.” English Journal, vol. 93, no. 5 2004, pp 82–89.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Rosenblatt Louise M. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Trans - actional Theory of the Literary Work. Southern Illinois UP 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Shakespeare William. Romeo and Juliet 1597 Lit2Go, Florida Center for Instructional Technology, etc.usf.edu/lit2go/201/romeo-and-juliet/.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Soter Anna O., et al. “What the Discourse Tells Us: Talk and Indicators of High-Level Comprehension.” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 47, no. 6 2008, pp 372–91.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Turner Kristen H., and Hicks Troy. “Connected Reading Is the Heart of Research.” English Journal, vol. 105, no. 2 2015, pp 41–48.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Turner Kristen H., and Hicks Troy. “Digital Literacy (Still) Can’t Wait: Renewing and Reframing the Conversation.” English Journal, vol. 112, no. 1 2022, pp 86–93.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Vygotsky Lev S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard UP 1978.
    [Google Scholar]