Skip to content
2018
Volume 110, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0013-8274
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8895
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ej202131133
2021-03-01
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barth Roland S. “Risk.” The Jossey-Bass Reader on Educational Leadership, edited byFullan Michael Jossey-Bass 2009, pp.211–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowen Tracey Whithaus Carl, editors. Multimodal Literacies and Emerging Genres. U of Pittsburgh P 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Faughey Deirdre. “‘Can We Do This?’: Cocreating Curriculum with a Twenty-First-Century Mindset.” English Journal, vol. 108, no. 5 2019, pp.68–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fleischer Cathy Andrew-Vaughan Sarah. Writing Outside Your Comfort Zone: Helping Students Navigate Unfamiliar Genres. Heinemann 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hackney Sean. “‘I Like the Freedom’: Digital Literacy and Authentic Audience.” English Journal, vol. 109, no. 6 2020, pp.59–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jensen Amber. “Preservice English Teachers’ Evolving Conceptions of Digital and Multimodal Writing.” Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, vol. 9, no. 2, article 5 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jensen Amber “Writing in and for the 21st Century: Crossing Digital and Multimodal Thresholds in ELA Methods Courses.” Using Tension as a Resource, edited byHallman Heidi L. et al.. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers 2019, pp.59–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LeFevre Deidre M. “Barriers to Implementing Pedagogical Change: The Role of Teachers’ Perceptions of Risk.” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 38. Feb 2014, pp.56–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mills Kathy A.Literacy Theories for the Digital Age: Social, Critical, Multimodal, Spatial, Material and Sensory Lenses. Multilingual Matters 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. National Council of Teachers of English. Beliefs for Integrating Technology into the English Language Arts Classroom 2018, www2.ncte.org/statement/beliefs-technology-preparation-english-teachers/.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. National Writing Project et al.. Because Digital Writing Matters: Improving Student Writing in Online and Multimedia Environments. Jossey-Bass 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Pasternak Donna L. “Is Technology Used as Practice? A Survey Analysis of Preservice English Teachers’ Perceptions and Classroom Practices.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 7, no. 3 2007, pp.140–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pew Research Center and National Commission on Writing. Writing, Technology and Teens 2008, www.pewresearch.org/internet/2008/04/24/writing-technology-and-teens/.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Reilly Colleen A. Atkins Anthony T. “Rewarding Risk: Designing Aspirational Assessment Processes for Digital Writing Projects.” Digital Writing Assessment and Evaluation, edited byMcKee Heidi A. Nicole DeVoss Dànielle. Computers and Composition Digital Press 2013, ccdigitalpress.org/dwae/.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rolfe Heather. Learning to Take Risks, Learning to Succeed. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts 2010, pp.1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wiesel Elie. Night Translated by Wiesel Marion. Hill and Wang 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ej202131133
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ej202131133
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error