Skip to content
2018
Volume 109, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0013-8274
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8895

Abstract

An English educator advocates for argumentative writing that is “debatable, defensible, and nuanced” (NWP).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ej202030783
2020-07-01
2025-03-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arshan Nicole Let al.Impacts on Students of a Short-Cycle Implementation of the National Writing Project’s College, Career, and Community Writers Program. SRI International 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brockman Elizabeth “Advanced Institute: NWP’s College Ready Writers Program,” Chippewa River Writing Project, 27June 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. College Board “AP Language Scoring Rubrics [for] Free Response Question #1 -Synthesis, Question #2 -Rhetorical Analysis, and Question #3 -Argument Essay: Effective Fall 2019.” apcentral.collegeboard.org/
  4. Friedrich Lindaet al.“For the Sake of Argument: An Approach to Teaching Evidence-Based Argument.” American Educator, vol. 42, no. 1 2018, pp.18–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fuller Maryet al.“A Rose for Emily: Celebrating Student Revision.” Ohio Journal of English Language Arts, vol. 32, no. 1 1991, pp.8–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gallagher H. Alixet al.Impact of the National Writing Project’s College-Ready Writers Program on Teachers and Students. SRI International 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Harris Joseph. Rewriting: How to Do Things with Texts, 2nd ed. Utah State U P 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hicks Troyet al.“Bringing Argument to Life.” NCTE Annual Convention, 17November 2018 Houston, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lindemann Erika. A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers. Oxford U P 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Murchie Sharon “Teaching the Story of the Angry White Man.” Michigan Reading Journal. in press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. National Writing Project.The College, Career, and Community Writers Programsites.google.com/nwp.org/c3wp/home
  12. Neyer JanetMessage to Elizabeth Brockman’s ENG 319 Class. Zoom, 29October 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Elizabeth Brockman. “Re: EJ Article.”, Received by 20Oct
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Elizabeth Brockman. “Re: Manuscript.”, Received by 6July 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Neyer Janetet al.Special Issue on the College, Career, and Community Writers Program. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, vol. 34, no. 2 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Elizabeth Brockman. “Re: Revised Manuscript.”, Received by 18Dec 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith Kristin E “Beyond Proving It: How C3WP Helps Students Write Nuanced Arguments and Purposeful Commentary.” Language Arts Journal of Michigan, vol. 34, no. 2 2019, pp.pp. 12–18.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/ej202030783
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ej202030783
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test