Amplifying Academic talk: High-Quality Discussions in the Language of Comfort

References

1. Alim H. Samy. “Critical Language Awareness in the United States: Revisiting Issues and Revising Pedagogies in a Resegregated Society.” Educational Researcher, vol. 34, no. 7 2005, pp 24 31 10.3102/0013189X034007024..
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barker Lisa Marie Under Discussion: Improvisational Theatre as a Tool for Improving Classroom Discourse Stanford University 2012 Open WorldCat purl.stanford.edu/vw966mx4424.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bunch George C. “The Language of Ideas and the Language of Display: Reconceptualizing ‘Academic Language’ in Linguistically Diverse Classrooms.”International Multilingual Research Journal, vol. 8, no. 1 Jan 2014, pp 70 86 Taylor and Francis 10.1080/19313152.2014.852431..
   [Google Scholar]
4. Center to Support Excellence in Teaching “Discussion Reflection Tool.” Microsoft Word file 2016.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Conference on College Composition Communication.. “Students’ Right to Their Own Language.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 25, no. 3 1974, pp 1–32.
   [Google Scholar]
6. hooks bell. We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity. Routledge 2004.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kavanagh Sarah Schneideret al. “Practicing Responsiveness: Using Approximations of Teaching to Develop Teachers’ Responsiveness to Students’ Ideas.” Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 71, no. 1 2020, pp 94–107.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kirkland David E. “English(es) in Urban Contexts: Politics, Pluralism, and Possibilities.” English Education, vol. 42, no. 3 2010, pp 293–306.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lippi-Green Rosina. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States, 2nd ed., Routledge 2012.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Marshall Tanji Reed. “To Correct or Not Correct: Confronting Decisions about African American Students’ Use of Language Varieties in the English Classroom.” English Journal, vol. 107, no. 5 2018, pp 51–56.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Metz Mike. “Accommodating linguistic prejudice? Examining English Teachers’ Language Ideologies.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique, vol. 18, no. 1 2019, pp 18–35.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Metz Mike. “Challenges of Confronting Dominant Language Ideologies in the High School English Classroom.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 52, no. 4 2018, pp 455–77.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Michaels Sarah, Catherine O’Connor “Conceptualizing Talk Moves as Tools: Professional Development Approaches for Academically Productive Discussion.”Socializing Intelligence through Talk and Dialogue edited by Resnick Lauren B. et al.. AERA 2015, pp 347–62.
    [Google Scholar]
14. National Council of Teachers of English. Resolution on Affirming the CCCC “Students’ Right to Their Own Language.” 30 Nov 2003 ncte.org/statement/affirmingstudents/.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Nystrand Martin. “Research on the Role of Classroom Discourse as It Affects Reading Comprehension.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 25, no. 3. Oct 2006, pp 392–412.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Orellana Marjorieet al. “More than Just a Hammer: Building Linguistic Toolkits.” Issues in Applied Linguistics, vol. 18, no. 2. Jan 2010, escholarship.org/uc/item/7j6044vz.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Rymes Betsy. “Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Focus on Communicative Repertoires.” Sociolinguistics and Language Education, edited byHornberger Nancy H. McKay S. L.. Multilingual Matters 2010, pp 528–46.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Zwiers Jeff. Building Academic Language: Essential Practices for Content Classrooms, Grades 5—12. John Wiley & Sons 2013.
    [Google Scholar]