Skip to content
2018
Volume 109, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0013-8274
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8895

Abstract

A teacher educator and preservice teachers in an adolescent literacy course read and talked about reading with students through a partnership with the Department of Juvenile Justice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ej201930377
2019-11-01
2023-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Appleman Deborah. Reading Better, Reading Smarter: Designing Literature Lessons for Adolescents. Heinemann 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Atwell Nancie. In the Middle: New Understandings about Writing, Reading, and Learning. Heinemann 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beers Kylene. When Kids Can’t Read, What Teachers Can Do. Heinemann 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Freire Paulo. Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy, and Civic Courage. Rowman and Littlefield 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gallagher Kelly. Readicide: How Schools Are Killing Reading and What You Can Do about It. Stenhouse 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodman Yetta et al.Reading Miscue Inventory: Alternative Procedures. Richard C. Owen Publishers 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Guba Egon. Toward a Methodology of Naturalistic Inquiry in Educational Evaluation. U of California P 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Harste Jerome. “Understanding the Hypothesis, It’s the Teacher That Makes the Difference: Part II.” Reading Horizons, pp.18, no. 2 1978, pp 89–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hernandez Donald. Double Jeopardy: How Third Grade Reading Skills and Poverty Influence High School Graduation, Apr 2011, files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518818.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill Marc Lamont. “Teaching English in the Age of Incarceration.” English Journal, pp.102, no. 4 2013, pp 16–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jobe Ron, Dayton-Sakari Mary. Reluctant Readers: Connecting Students and Books for Successful Reading Experiences. Pembroke 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee Michelle Ye Hee. “Yes, U.S. Locks People Up at a Higher Rate Than any Other Country.” The Washington Post 7 July 2015 www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/07/07/yes-u-s-locks-people-up-at-a-higher-rate-than-any-other-country/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e6359cdd1e8e.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Macon James et al.Responses to Literature. International Reading Association 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mueller Pamela. Lifers: Learning from At-Risk Adolescent Readers. Heinemann 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Styslinger Mary et al.Literacy behind Bars: Successful Reading and Writing Strategies for Use with Incarcerated Youth and Adults. Rowman and Littlefield 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sum Andrew, et al. “The Consequences of Dropping Out of High School: Joblessness and Jailing for High School Dropouts and the High Cost for Taxpayers.” IssueLab 1 Oct 2009 www.issuelab.org/resource/theconsequences-of-dropping-out-of-high-school-joblessness-and-jailing-for-high-school-dropouts-and-the-high-cost-for-taxpayers.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tatum Alfred. Reading for their Life: (Re)Building the Textual Lineages of African American Adolescent Males. Heinemann 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tierney Robert et al.Reading Strategies and Practices: A Compendium. Allyn and Bacon 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tovani Cris. I Read It, but I Don’t Get It: Comprehension Strategies for Adolescent Readers. Stenhouse 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Weaver Constance. Reading Process and Practice, 3rd ed., Heinemann 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wood Karen. “Probable Passages: A Writing Strategy.” The Reading Teacher, pp.37, no. 6 1984, pp 496–99.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ej201930377
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ej201930377
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error