Backchanneling as an Approach to Discussing Literature

References

1. Gee James Paul “A Situated-Sociocultural Approach to Literacy and Technology.” The New Literacies: Multiple Perspectives on Research and Practice, edited byBaker Elizabeth A.. Guilford 2010, pp.165–93.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Haley Alex. The Autobiography of Malcolm X. Grove 1967.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Jackson Brooks. unSpun: Finding Facts in a World of Disinformation. Random House 2007.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Langer Judith A.The Process of Understanding Literature, Report series 2.1. Center for the Learning and Teaching of Literature 1989, files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED315755.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lewis Cynthia. “Critical Issues: Limits of Identification: The Personal, Pleasurable, and Critical in Reader Response.” Journal of Literacy Research, vol. 32, no.2 2000, pp.253–66.
   [Google Scholar]
6. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. “Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts.” 2010, www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Orwell George. 1984. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1977.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Vygotsky Lev S.Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard UP 1980.
   [Google Scholar]
9. White Sheida. “Backchannels across Cultures: A Study of Americans and Japanese.” Language in Society, vol. 18, no.1 1989, pp.59–76.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Wiggins Grant. “What, Exactly, Is Close Reading of the Text?” Granted, and …, 13May 2013, grantwiggins.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/what-exactly-is-close-reading-of-the-text.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Yngve Victor “On Getting a Word in Edgewise.” Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society 1970 Chicago Linguistics Society Chicago, IL
    [Google Scholar]