Thinking Inductively about Conventions: Activities for Teaching grammar in Context

References

1. Bradbury Ray. The Illustrated Man. Doubleday 1951.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Connors Robert J., and Andrea A. Lunsford. “Frequency of Formal Errors in Current College Writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle Do Research.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 39, no.4 1988, pp.395–409
   [Google Scholar]
3. Donovan Jeanne M. “Resurrect the ‘Dragon Grammaticus.’“. English Journal, vol. 79, no.1 1990, pp.62–65
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dunn Patricia A., and Kenneth Lindblom. “Why Revitalize Grammar?” English Journal, vol. 92, no.3 2003, pp.43–50
   [Google Scholar]
5. Hartwell Patrick “Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar.” Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader, edited byVillanueva Victor Arola Kristin L., 3rd ed., NCTE 2011, pp.205–33
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hillocks George. Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. National Conference on Research in English 1986.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Krashen Stephen D.Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon 1982.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Lunsford Andrea A. “Cognitive Development and the Basic Writer.” Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader, edited byVillanueva Victor Arola Kristin L., 3rd ed., NCTE 2011, pp.279–90
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lunsford Andrea A. “What We Know—and Don’t Know—about Remedial Writing.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 29, no.1 1978, pp.47–52
   [Google Scholar]
10. Weaver Constance. Teaching Grammar in Context. Boynton/Cook 1996.
    [Google Scholar]