f Heroin Zombies and Haunting Statistics: Helping Students Reimagine the Research Product

References

1. Barry Elaine S. “Can Paraphrasing Practice Help Students Define Plagiarism?” College Student Journal, vol. 40, no.2 2006, pp.377–84
   [Google Scholar]
2. Beckman Karley et al. “Understanding Students’ Use and Value of Technology for Learning.” Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 39, no.3 2014, pp.346–67
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bilal Dania. “Children’s Use of the Yahooligans! Web Search Engine: II. Cognitive and Physical Behaviors on Research Tasks.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 52, no.2 2001, pp.118–36
   [Google Scholar]
4. Colwell Jamie Amy C. Hutchison. “Supporting Teachers in Integrating Digital Technology into Language Arts Instruction to Promote Literacy.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, vol. 31, no.2 2015, pp.56–63
   [Google Scholar]
5. Curtis Guy J. et al. “Online Academic-Integrity Mastery Training May Improve Students’ Awareness of, and Attitudes toward, Plagiarism.” Psychology Learning and Teaching, vol. 12, no.3 2013, pp.282–89
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ellis Robert A. et al. “High School Students’ Experiences of Learning through Research on the Internet.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 27, no.6 2011, pp.503–15
   [Google Scholar]
7. Graber Diana. “New Media Literacy Education (NMLE): A Developmental Approach.” Journal of Media Literacy Education, vol. 4, no.1 2012, pp.82–92
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gumble Andrea. “Finding a Voice: Freedom through Digital Literacies.” The Educational Forum, vol. 76, no.4 2012, pp.434–37
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hobbs Renee et al. “Learning to Engage: How Positive Attitudes about the News, Media Literacy, and Video Production Contribute to Adolescent Civic Engagement.” Educational Media International, vol. 50, no.4 2013, pp.231–46
   [Google Scholar]
10. Klausman Jeffrey. “Teaching about Plagiarism in the Age of the Internet.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 27, no.2 1999, pp.209–12
    [Google Scholar]
11. Koehler Matthew J., and Punya Mishra. “What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge?” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 9, no.1 2009, pp.60–70
    [Google Scholar]
12. Levy Sharon et al. “Facing Addiction: A Laudable, but Incomplete Effort.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 108, no.2 2018, pp.153–55
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lund Donna Joan. “Video Production in the English Language Arts Classroom.” English Journal, vol. 87, no.1 1998, pp.78–82
    [Google Scholar]
14. Mishra Punya Matthew J. Koehler. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.” Teachers College Record, vol. 108, no.6 2006, pp.1017–54
    [Google Scholar]
15. Pearson Nancy Guillot. “Classrooms That Discourage Plagiarism and Welcome Technology.” English Journal, vol. 100, no.6 2011, pp.54–59
    [Google Scholar]
16. Quinones Sam. Dreamland: The True Tale of America’s Opiate Epidemic. Bloomsbury 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ranker Jason. “A New Perspective on Inquiry: A Case Study of Digital Video Production.” English Journal, vol. 97, no.1 2007, pp.77–82
    [Google Scholar]
18. Shulman Lee S. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher, vol. 15, no.2 1986, pp.4–14
    [Google Scholar]
19. Spires Hiller A. et al. “Energizing Project-Based Inquiry: Middle-Grade Students Read, Write, and Create Videos.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, vol. 55, no.6 2012, pp.483–93
    [Google Scholar]