Skip to content
2018
Volume 107, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0013-8274
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8895
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

The authors examine photovoice projects created by students and teacher candidates who explored issues of gender in response to a young adult novel and co-researched that process.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ej201829465
2018-01-01
2024-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ej/107/3/englishjournal29465.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.58680/ej201829465&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Airton Lee. “Leave ‘Those Kids’ Alone: On the Conflation of School Homophobia and Suffering Queers.” Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 43, no. 5 2013, pp.532–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackburn Mollie V. “Disrupting the (Hetero)normative: Exploring Literacy Performances and Identity Work with Queer Youth.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, vol. 46, no. 4 2002–03, pp.312–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cammarota Julio, Fine Michelle. Revolutionizing Education: Youth Participatory Action Research in Motion. Routledge 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cochran-Smith Marilyn, Lytle Susan. Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. Teachers College Press 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cronn-Mills Kristin. Beautiful Music for Ugly Children. Flux 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Doerr-Stevens Candace. “Embracing the Messiness of Research: Documentary Video Composing as Embodied, Critical Media Literacy.” English Journal, vol. 106, no. 3 2017, pp.56–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Freire Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum 1970 2005
    [Google Scholar]
  8. hicks benjamin lee. “Gracefully Unexpected, Deeply Present and Positively Disruptive: Love and Queerness in Classroom Community.” Bank Street Occasional Paper Series, vol. 37 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hurst Heather. “Dodging the ‘R’ Word: Research as a Tacit Process.” English Journal, vol. 105, no. 2 2015, pp.96–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Janks Hilary. Literacy and Power. Routledge 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jocius Robin. “Telling Unexpected Stories: Students as Multimodal Artists.” English Journal, vol. 105, no. 5 2016, pp.16–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jocson Korina M. “Remix Revisited: Critical Solidarity in Youth Media Arts.” E-Learning and Digital Media, vol. 10, no. 1 2013, pp.68–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kanu Yatta, Glor Mark. “‘Currere’ to the Rescue? Teachers as ‘Amateur Intellectuals’ in a Knowledge Society.” Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, vol. 4, no. 2 2006, pp.101–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Siegel Marjorie. “More Than Words: The Generative Power of Transmediation for Learning.” Canadian Journal of Education, vol. 20, no. 4 1995, pp.455–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Simon Rob et al. “Navigating the ‘Delicate Relationship between Empathy and Critical Distance’: Youth Literacies, Social Justice, and Arts-Based Inquiry.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique, vol. 15, no. 3 2016, pp.430–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Vasudevan Lalitha et al. “Rethinking Composing in a Digital Age: Authoring Literate Identities through Multimodal Storytelling.” Written Communication, vol. 27, no. 4 2010, pp.442–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang Caroline C. “Youth Participation in Photovoice as a Strategy for Community Change.” Journal of Community Practice, vol. 14 2006, pp.147–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zenkov Kristien et al. “Diverse Youth, New Teachers, and ‘Picturing’ Literacy: Using Photovoice to ‘Partner’ Our Way to Adolescents’ Perspectives on Literacy.” Adolescent Literacies: A Handbook of Practice-Based Research, edited byHinchman Kathleen A., Appleman Deborah A., Guilford 2017, pp.148–68.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ej201829465
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ej201829465
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error