oa ELATE Position Statement: Exploring, Incorporating, and Questioning Generative Artificial Intelligence in English Teacher Education

References

1. Beach C. L., Alvermann D. E., Loomis S., Wright W., & Hutcherson Price L. (2023) Digital remixing online: Entangled feelings. Digital Culture & Education, 14(4), 92–108. (Open Access) https://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/volume-14-4
   [Google Scholar]
2. Behizadeh N., Johnson, L.L., & Garcia M. (2023) Promise and perils of GenAI in English education: Reflections from the national technology leadership summit. English Education, 56(1), 8–19.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bozard Z. (2023) What does it mean to create art? Intellectual property rights for artificial intelligence generated artworks. South Carolina Journal of International Law & Business, 20(1), 83–101.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023) A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–25.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cohn J. (2021) Skim, dive, surface: Teaching digital reading. West Virginia University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Crawford K. (2021) Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fitria, T. N. (2023, March). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 44–58.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hashem R., Ali N., El Zein F., Fidalgo P., & Abu Khurma O. (2023) AI to the rescue: Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a teacher ally for workload relief and burnout prevention. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19(23): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19023
   [Google Scholar]
9. Inclezan D., & Prádanos L. I. (2023) AI for sustainability. In Torre D. La, Appio F. P., Masri H., Lazzeri F., & Schiavone F. (Eds.), Impact of artificial intelligence in business and society (1st ed., pp. 192–211). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003304616-13
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ito M., Baumer S., Bittanti M., Boyd D., Cody R., Herr-Stephenson B., Horst H. A., Lange P. G., Mahendran D., Martínez K. Z., & Pascoe C. J., (2010) Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kim G. M., Johnson L. L., & Nash B. L. (2023) Games to promote empathy as a literacy practice: A new teacher’s playful practice. English Education, 56(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee202356120
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kirkpatrick K. (2023) Can AI demonstrate creativity? Communications of the ACM, 66(2), 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3575665
    [Google Scholar]
13. Leander K. M., & Burriss S. K. (2020) Critical literacy for a posthuman world: When people read, and become, with machines. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1262–1276. doi:10.1111/bjet.12924
    [Google Scholar]
14. McBride C., Smith A., & Kalir J. H. (2023) Tinkering toward teacher learning: A case for critical playful literacies in teacher education. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 22(2), 221–233.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Moran C. M. (2024) Ed Revolutionizing English education: The power of AI in the classroom. Bloomsbury/Rowman & Littlefield/Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Nash B. L., Hicks T., Garcia M., Fassbender W., Alvermann D., Boutelier S., McBride C., McGrail E., Moran C., O’Byrne I., Piotrowski A., Rice M., & Young C. A. (2023) Artificial intelligence in English education: Challenges and opportunities for teachers and teacher educators. English Education, 55(3), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee202332555
    [Google Scholar]
17. National Council of Teachers of English (2018, October 25). Beliefs for integrating technology into the English language arts classroom. https://ncte.org/statement/beliefs-technology-preparation-english-teachers/
18. National Council of Teachers of English (2019, November 7). Definition of literacy in a digital age. https://ncte.org/statement/nctes-definition-literacy-digital-age
19. National Council of Teachers of English (2021) NCTE standards for the initial preparation of teachers of English Language Arts 7–12 (Initial Licensure). https://ncte.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/2021_NCTE_Standards.pdf#:~:text=Standard%201:%20Candidates%20apply%20and
20. Noble S. U. (2018) Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Robinson B. (2023) Speculative propositions for digital writing under the new autonomous model of literacy. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00358-5
    [Google Scholar]
22. Shneiderman B. (2021) Human-centered AI. Issues in Science and Technology, 37(2), 56–61.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Tacheva J., & Ramasubramanian S. (2023) AI Empire: Unraveling the interlocking systems of oppression in generative AI’s global order. Big Data & Society, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231219241
    [Google Scholar]
24. Turner K. H., & Hicks T. (2015) Connected reading is the heart of research. English Journal, 105(2), 41–48.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Turner K., Hicks T., Schoenborn A., Murchie S., & Cornwell, A. (2024, March). Now the hard work begins: Inviting writers to use AI tools. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2024(1), 887–891. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
    [Google Scholar]
26. Young C. A., Jacobs L., Celaya A., Lathrop B., Hackett-Hill K., Scialdone M., Moehrke H., Gaddis B., Settie K., Kuriny D., & James N. (2024) In conversation about GenAI in ELA education: Initial insights and experiences from ELA teachers and ELA teacher educators. In Moran C. M. (Ed.), Revolutionizing English education: The power of AI in the classroom. Bloomsbury/Rowman & Littlefield/Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]