Skip to content
2018
Volume 57, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0007-8204
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2216

Abstract

This article explores the affordances of roleplaying games (RPGs) in teacher education contexts for supporting navigation across personal, cultural, and literary interpretive practices. Coding preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) discussions about their own learning experiences, we see how tabletop RPGs designed around existing texts have the potential to support both textual comprehension as well as literary interpretation. RPGs made space for circumventing difficult language and Western cultural knowledge, instead foregrounding students’ identities, textual connections, questions, and meaning-making. PSTs described the benefits of a “double experience” in which their own decisions in the roleplaying game structured their understanding of the original text when they were reading and their interpretations of it after the activity. We share teacher learning around design, including tensions around staying on script to support comprehension or going “off-script” to support critical literary interpretation. We suggest that RPGs in English education contexts can help teachers see the potential of centering joyful, sometimes messy, interpretive meaning-making while decentering individual texts and teacher-centric pedagogies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ee20245719
2024-10-01
2025-06-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acosta M. M., & Denham A. R. (2018) Simulating oppression: Digital gaming, race and the education of African American children. The Urban Review, 50, 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-017-0436-7
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker-Bell A. (2019) Dismantling anti-black linguistic racism in English language arts classrooms: Toward an anti-racist black language pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 59(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665415
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck S. W., Jones K., Storm S., Torres J. R., Smith H., & Bennett M. (2020) Moves that matter: Dialogic writing assessment and literary reading. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-12-2019-0167
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Coleridge S. T. (1828) The poetical works of S. T. Coleridge: Including the dramas of Wallenstein, Remorse, and Zapolya. William Pickering.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook M. P., Gremo M., & Morgan R. (2017) We’re just playing: The influence of a modified tabletop role-playing game on ELA students’ in-class reading. Simulation & Gaming, 48(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116684570
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coopilton M. (2022) Critical game literacies and critical speculative imagination: A theoretical and conceptual review. Gamevironments, 17, 222–273. https://doi.org/10.48783/gameviron.v17i17.196
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Corbitt A. (2023) Collaborative worldbuilding: Examining identities, ideologies, and literacy practices in a youth role-playing community [Doctoral dissertation, Boston College]. http://dlib.bc.edu/islandora/object/bc-ir:109697
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Delson A. (1968) A search for meaning: A critical history of the thematic interpretations of “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” 1798–1965 [Doctoral dissertation]. New York University.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dunkerly-Bean J., & Bean T. W. (2016) Missing the savoir for the connaissance: Disciplinary and content area literacy as regimes of truth. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(4), 448–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16674988
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dyches J., & Sams B. L. (2018) Reconciling competing missions of English education: A story of pedagogical realism. Changing English, 25(4), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2018.1499006
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gallup J., Duff C., Serianni B., & Gallup A. (2016) An exploration of friendships and socialization for adolescents with autism engaged in massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPG). Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(3), 223–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Garcia A. (2020) Gaming literacies: Spatiality, materiality, and analog learning in a digital age. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.260
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gutierrez A., Mills K., Scholes L., Rowe L., & Pink E. (2023) What do secondary teachers think about digital games for learning: Stupid fixation or the future of education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 133, Article 104278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104278
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jogie M. R. (2015) Too pale and stale: Prescribed texts used for teaching culturally diverse students in Australia and England. Oxford Review of Education, 41(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1009826
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones K., Storm S., Castillo J., & Karbachinskiy S. (2021) Chasing new worlds: Stories of roleplaying in classroom spaces. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 17(1), 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kane B. D., Keene K. C., & Reynolds S. (2022) Collaborative literary reasoning as a support for preservice English language arts teachers’ learning about disciplinary literacy. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 21(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-06-2021-0065
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kavanagh S. S., & Rainey E. C. (2017) Learning to support adolescent literacy: Teacher educator pedagogy and novice teacher take up in secondary English language arts teacher preparation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 904–937. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217710423
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim G. M., & Johnson L. L. (2021) Playful practices: Reimagining literacy teacher education through game-based curriculum design. Research in the Teaching of English, 55(3), 241–264.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim G. M., Johnson L. L., & Nash B. (2023) Games to promote empathy as a literacy practice: A new teacher’s playful practice. English Education, 56(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee202356120
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu F.-C., & Chang B. (2016) Role-play game-enhanced English for a specific- purpose vocabulary-acquisition framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 367–377.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McBride C., Smith A., & Kalir J. H. (2023) Tinkering toward teacher learning: A case for critical playful literacies in teacher education. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 22(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-08-2022-0114
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Moje E. B. (2007) Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07300046
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nash B. L., & Brady R. B. (2022) Video games in the secondary English language arts classroom: A state-of-the-art review of the literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(3), 957–981. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.454
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nielsen D. (2015) Identity performance in roleplaying games. Computers and Composition, 38(A), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.003
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Owl! at the Library [@SketchesbyBoze] (2024, February 23). Taylor Swift just announced the release of a new song called “The Albatross” and that noise you hear is every [Post]. X. https://x.com/SketchesbyBoze/status/1761068368327586074
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rainey E. C. (2017) Disciplinary literacy in English language arts: Exploring the social and problem-based nature of literary reading and reasoning. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.154
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Saldaña J. (2015) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Storm S., & Jones K. (2021) Queering critical literacies: Disidentifications and queer futurity in an afterschool storytelling and roleplaying game. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 20(4), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-10-2020-0131
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Thomas E. E., & Stornaiuolo A. (2016) Restorying the self: Bending toward textual justice. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.313
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Vossoughi S., Escudé M., Kitundu W., & Espinoza M. L. (2021) Pedagogical “hands and eyes”: Embodied learning and the genesis of ethical perception. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 52(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12382
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Williams J., & Gabrion L. (2022) Disrupting the status quo in disciplinary literacy professional learning. English Leadership Quarterly, 44(3), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.58680/elq202231672
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Woods P. J., & Jones K. (2022) Players chatter and dice clatter: Exploring sonic power relations in posthuman game-based learning ecologies. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 44(5), 754–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2022.2140124
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/ee20245719
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ee20245719
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test