Research: Preparation and Practice: Preservice English Teachers’ Experiences in Learning to Facilitate Text-Based Discussions

References

1. Almasi J. F. Garas-York K. (2009) Comprehension and discussion of text. InIsrael S. E. Duffy G. G. Eds Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension. pp. 470–493). Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alston C. L. Danielson K. A. Dutro E. Cartun A. (2018) Does a discussion by any other name sound the same? Teaching discussion in three ELA methods courses.. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 225–238.
   [Google Scholar]
3. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. 2013) The changing teacher preparation profession. AACTE.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Benedict-Chambers A. (2016) Using tools to promote novice teacher noticing of science teaching practices in post-rehearsal discussions.. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 28–44.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bondie R. Mancenido Z. Dede C. (2021) Interaction principles for digital puppeteering to promote teacher learning.. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(1), 107–123.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boyd M. Rubin D. (2006) How contingent questioning promotes extended student talk: A function of display questions.. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(2), 141–169.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Braun V. Clarke V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology.. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brooks G. (1963) the mother. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43309/the-mother-56d2220767a02
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cazden C. B. Beck S. W. (2003) Classroom discourse. InGraesser A. C. Gernsbacher M. A. Goldman S. R. Eds Handbook of discourse processes. pp. 165–197). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cohen J. Wong V. Krishnamachari A. Berlin R. (2020) Teacher coaching in a simulated environment.. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 208–231.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Coleman D. (2011, April28). Bringing the Common Core to life. Webinar New York State Education Department https://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/docs/bringingthecom moncoretolife/fulltranscript.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
12. Corbin J. Strauss A. (2008) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Creswell J. W. Clark V. L. P. (2011) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dalinger T. Thomas K. B. Stansberry S. Xiu Y. (2020) A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for pre-service teachers.. Computers & Education, 144, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
15. DeFrance N. L. Fahrenbruck M. L. (2016) Constructing a plan for text-based discussion.. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 59(5), 575–585.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dieker L. A. Rodriguez J. A. Lignugaris/Kraft B. Hynes M. C. Hughes C. E. (2014) The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: Current and future possibilities.. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fisher D. Frey N. (2015) Text-dependent questions, grades 6–12: Pathways to close and critical reading. Corwin.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ghousseini H. Herbst P. (2016) Pedagogies of practice and opportunities to learn about classroom mathematics discussions.. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(1), 79–103.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Grossman P. Hammerness K. McDonald M. (2009) Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education.. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hatano G. Inagaki K. (1986) Two courses of expertise. Stevenson H. Azuma H. Hakuta K. Eds Children development and education in Japan. pp 262–272). Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hess D. Posselt J. (2002) How high school students experience and learn from the discussion of controversial public issues.. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 17(4), 283–314.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hixon E. So H. (2009) Technology’s role in field experiences for preservice teacher training.. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 294–304.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jakobson R. (1987) Language in literature Pomorska K. Rudy S. Eds Belknap.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kavanagh S. S. Rainey E. C. (2017) Learning to support adolescent literacy: Teacher educator pedagogy and novice teacher take up in secondary English language arts teacher preparation.. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 904–937.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kloser M. Wilsey M. Madkins T. C. Windschitl M. (2019) Connecting the dots: Secondary science teacher candidates’ uptake of the core practice of facilitating sensemaking discussions from teacher education experiences.. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 115–127.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Larson A. E. (2020) Moving educator preparation forward during the pandemic. EdPrepMatters.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lave J. (1991) Situating learning in communities of practice. InResnick L. B. Levine J. M. Teasley S. D. Eds Perspectives on socially shared cognition. pp. 63–82). American Psychological Association.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lawrence J. Snow C. (2010) Oral discourse and reading. InKamil M. Pearson P. D. Moje E. Afflerbach P. Eds Handbook of Reading Research, IV pp. 320–337). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Levine S. (2014) Making interpretation visible with an affect-based strategy.. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(3), 283–303.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Levine S. Trepper K. Chung R. H. Coelho R. (2021) How feeling supports students’ classroom discussions of literature.. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(4), 491–515.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lightner S. C. Wilkinson I. A. G. (2016) Instructional frameworks for quality talk about text: Choosing the best approach.. The Reading Teacher, 70(4), 435–444.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Maloch B. (2002) Scaffolding student talk: One teacher’s role in literature discussion groups.. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(1), 94–112.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Meneses A. Hugo E. García M. de los Á. Müller M. (2018) Facilitating academic text-based discussions in initial teacher education: Evaluating specialized knowledge.. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 119–130.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Murphy P. K. Greene J. A. Firetto C. M. Hendrick B. D. Li M. Montalbano C. Wei L. (2018) Quality talk: Developing students’ discourse to promote highlevel comprehension.. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 1113–1160.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Murphy P. K. Wilkinson I. A. G. Soter A. O. Hennessey M. N. Alexander J. F. (2009) Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Nassaji H. Wells G. (2000) What’s the use of “triadic dialogue”?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction.. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376–406.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Piro J. S. O’Callaghan C. (2019) Journeying towards the profession: Exploring liminal learning within mixed reality simulations.. Action in Teacher Education, 41(1), 79–95.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rainey E. C. (2017) Disciplinary literacy in English Language Arts: Exploring the social and problem-based nature of literary reading and reasoning.. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 53–71.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Reisman A. Kavanagh S. S. Monte-Sano C. Fogo B. McGrew S. C. Cipparone P. Simmons E. (2018) Facilitating whole-class discussions in history: A framework for preparing teacher candidates.. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 278–293.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Roethke T. (1942) My Papa’s Waltz https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43330/my-papas-waltz
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rosenblatt L. M. (1982) The literary transaction: Evocation and response.. Theory into Practice, 21(4), 268–277.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sacks H. Schegloff E. A. Jefferson G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Saldaña J. (2016) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schuitema J. Radstake H. van de Pol J. Veugelers W. (2018) Guiding classroom discussions for democratic citizenship education. Educational Studies, 44(4), 377–407.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Schutz K. M. Danielson K. A. Cohen J. (2019) Approximations in English language arts: Scaffolding a shared teaching practice.. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 100–111.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Slater M. Lotto B. Arnold M. M. Sanchez-Vives M. V. (2009) How we experience immersive virtual environments: The concept of presence and its measurement.. Anuario de Psicologia, 40(2), 193–210.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Smagorinsky P. (2008) The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports.. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Theelen H. van den Beemt A. Brok P. den. (2019) Classroom simulations in teacher education to support preservice teachers’ interpersonal competence: A systematic literature review.. Computers and Education, 129, 14–26.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wade S. Thompson A. Watkins W. (1994) The role of belief systems in authors’ and readers’ construction of texts. InGarner R. Alexander P. A. Eds Beliefs about texts and instruction with text. pp. 265–293). Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
50. White B. (2015) John Dewey, the Common Core, and the teaching of English.. English Education, 48(1), 11–40.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Williamson P. (2013) Enacting high leverage practices in English methods: The case of discussion.. English Education, 46(1), 34–67.
    [Google Scholar]