Research: “Can Someone Please Say Something?”: Avoiding Chaos in a Virtual Environment

References

1. Abell S. K. Dillon D. R. Hopkins C. J. McInerney W. D. O’Brien D. G. (1995) “Somebody to count on”: Mentor/intern relationships in a beginning teacher internship program.. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(2), 173–188.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barnes M. E. Marlatt R. (2020) From involvement to solidarity: Community engagement to foster culturally-proactive and constructivist pedagogy.. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2020.1832005
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blase J. J. (1986) A qualitative analysis of sources of teacher stress: Consequences for performance.. American Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 13–40.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Butz M. R. (1997) Chaos and complexity: Implications for psychological theory and practices. Taylor & Francis.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Casey G. Evans T. (2011) Designing for learning: Online social networks as a classroom environment.. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 1–26.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Caulfield J. (2011) How to design and teach a hybrid course: Achieving studentcentered learning through blended classroom, online and experiential activities. Stylus Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Charmaz K. Belgrave L. (2012) Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis.. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 2, 347–365.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chubbuck S. Clift R. Allard J. Quinlan J. (2001) Playing it safe as a novice teacher: Implications for programs for new teachers.. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(5), 365–376.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cochran-Smith M. Ell F. Grudnoff L. Ludlow L. Haigh M. Hill M. (2014) When complexity theory meets critical realism: A platform or research on initial teacher education.. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(1), 105–122.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dorner H. Kumar S. (2017) Attributes of pre-service and inservice teacher satisfaction with online collaborative mentoring.. Online Learning, 21(4), 283–301.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dorner H. Misic G. Rymarenko M. (2020) Online mentoring for academic practice: Strategies, implications, and innovations.. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1483(1), 98–111.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ensher E. A. Heun C. Blanchard A. (2003) Online mentoring and computermediated communication: New directions in research.. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 264–288.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Feiman-Nemser S. (1993) Teacher mentoring: A critical review. ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fleener J. (2005) Introduction: Chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture. InDoll W. E. Fleener M. J. St. Julien J. Eds Chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture: A conversation. pp. 2–17). Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Garcia M. Marlatt R. McDermott M. O’Byrne W. I. (2021) Today is the tomorrow we should have prepared for yesterday: Rebuilding our classrooms to facilitate student-centered, teacher-friendly, tech-supported education.. Voices from the Middle, 28(3
    [Google Scholar]
16. Glaser B. G. Strauss A. L. (2017) Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gonzales L. Ybarra González M. the Fugitive Literacies Collective (2020) Multimodal cuentos as fugitive literacies on the Mexico-US borderlands.. English Education, 52(3), 223–255.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hayles N. K. (1990) Chaos bound: Orderly disorder in contemporary literature and science. Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kumar S. Johnson M. (2019) Online mentoring of dissertations: The role of structure and support.. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 59–71.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ladson-Billings G. (2020) Rethinking intervention. Instruction Partners https://instructionpartners.org/2020/08/07/dr-gloria-ladson-billings/
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lei J. (2009) Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed?Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 87–97.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Linder K. E. (2017) Fundamentals of hybrid teaching and learning.. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2017(149), 11–18.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Maxwell J. (2010) Validity: How might you be wrong?. InLuttrell W. Ed Qualitative educational research: Readings in reflexive methodology and transformative practice. pp. 279–287). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. McAndrew D. (1997) Chaos, complexity, and fuzziness: Science looks at teaching English.. English Journal, 86(7), 37–43.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Moran C. M. (2018) “Just don’t bore us to death”: Seventh graders’ perceptions of flipping a technology-mediated English language arts unit.. Middle Grades Review, 4(1 Article 5 1–18 https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/mgreview/vol4/iss1/5
    [Google Scholar]
26. Moran C. M. Young C. A. (2015) Questions to consider before flipping.. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(2), 42–46.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Morrison K. (2008) Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory. InMason M. Ed Complexity theory and the philosophy of education. pp. 16–31). West Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
28. National Council of Teachers of English (2018) Beliefs for integrating technology into the English language arts classroom. https://ncte.org/statement/beliefstechnology-preparation-english-teachers
    [Google Scholar]
29. Prigogine I. Stengers I. (1984) Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Redmond M. V. (2015) Social exchange theory.. English Technical Reports and White Papers. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/engl_reports/5
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sabar N. (2004) From heaven to reality through crisis: Novice teachers as migrants.. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 145–161.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Scherff L. (2008) Disavowed: The stories of two novice teachers.. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1317–1332.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sealey-Ruiz Y. (2016) Why Black girls’ literacies matter: New literacies for a new era.. English Education, 48(4), 290–298.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Smagorinsky P. Barnes M. E. (2014) Revisiting and revising the apprenticeship of observation.. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(4), 29–52.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Smith K. Lev-Ari L. (2005) The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education: The voice of the students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 289–302.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Strom K. Martin A. D. Villegas A. M. (2018) Teachers College Record, 120(7), 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Vetter A. Schieble M. Meacham M. (2018) Critical conversations in English education: Discursive strategies for examining how teacher and student identities shape classroom discourse.. English Education, 50(3), 255–282.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Viesca K. M. Strom K. Hammer S. Masterson J. Linzell C. H. Mitchell-McCollough J. Flynn N. (2019) Developing a complex portrait of content teaching for multilingual learners via nonlinear theoretical understandings.. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 304–335.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Viswanathan U. (2019) Understanding the relationship between second language teacher beliefs and their instructional practices: A case study of core French teachers.. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 26–59.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Vygotsky L. S. (1978 Cole M. John-Steiner V. Scribner S. Souberman Y. E. Eds Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Waldrop M. M. (1992) Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Young C. A. Bush J. (2004) Teaching the English language arts with technology: A critical approach and pedagogical framework.. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(1), 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]