Developing Adaptive Expertise in Facilitating Text-Based Discussions: Attending to Generalities and Novelty

References

1. Anagnostopoulos D. Smith E. R. Nystrand M. (2008) Creating dialogic spaces to support teachers’ discussion practices: An introduction. English Education, 41(1), 4–12.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Applebee A. N. Langer J. A. Nystrand M. Gamoran A. (2003) Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school english. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730 10.3102/00028312040003685
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aukerman M. S. Belfatti M. A. Santori D. M. (2008) Teaching and learning dialogically organized reading instruction. English Education, 40(4), 340–364.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barker L. M. (2012) Under discussion: Improvisational theatre as a tool for improving classroom discourse Retrieved from Stanford Digital Repository http://purl.stanford.edu/vw966mx4424
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barker L. M. Borko H. (2011) Presence and the art of improvisational teaching. InSawyer R. K. (Ed.) Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp.279–298). Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boyd M. P. Markarian W. C. (2015) Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(3), 272–296.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bransford J. D. Derry S. Berliner D. Hammerness K. Beckett K. L. (2005) Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. InDarling-Hammond L. Bransford J. (Eds.) Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp.40–87). Jossey-Bass.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Caughlan S. Juzwik M. M. Borsheim-Black C. Kelly S. Fine J. G. (2013) English teacher candidates developing dialogically organized instructional practices. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(3), 212–246.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cohen J. Schuldt L. C. Brown L. Grossman P. (2016) Leveraging observation tools for instructional improvement: Exploring variability in uptake of ambitious instructional practices. Teachers College Record, 118(11), 1–36.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Feiman-Nemser S. Buchmann M. (1985) On what is learned in student teaching: Appraising the experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education. Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grossman P. L. Compton C. Igra D. Ronfeldt M. Shahan E. Williamson P. (2009) Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. The Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Grossman P. L. Hammerness K. McDonald M. (2009) Redefining teaching, reimagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 273–289.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Grossman P. Kavanagh S. S. Dean C. P. (2018) The turn towards practice-based teacher education: Introduction to the work of the Core Practice Consortium. InGrossman P. (Ed.) Teaching Core Practices in Teacher Education (pp.1–14). Harvard Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Grossman P. Kazemi E. Kavanagh S. S. Franke M. Dutro E. (2019) Learning to facilitate discussions: Collaborations in practice-based teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 81, 97–99 10.1016/j.tate.2019.02.002
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hatano G. Inagaki K. (1986) Two courses of expertise. InStevenson H. Azuma H. Hakuta K. (Eds.) Children development and education in Japan (pp.262–272). Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kavanagh S. S. (2017) Practicing social justice: Towards a practice-based approach to learning to teach for social justice. InBrandenburg R. Glasswell K. Jones M. Ryan J. (Eds.) Reflective theories in teacher education practice: Process, impact, and enactment (pp.161–175). Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kavanagh S. S. Conrad J. Dagogo-Jack S. (2020) From rote to reasoned: Examining the role of pedagogical reasoning in practice-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education. Advanced online publication 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102991
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kavanagh S. S. Danielson K. A. (2019) Practicing justice, justifying practice: Toward critical practice teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 57(1), 69–105 10.3102/0002831219848691
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kavanagh S. S. Metz M. Hauser M. Fogo B. Taylor M. W. Carlson J. (2020) Practicing responsiveness: Using approximations of teaching to develop teachers’ responsiveness to students’ ideas. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 94–107 10.1177/0022487119841884
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kavanagh S. S. Monte-Sano C. Reisman A. Fogo B. McGrew S. Cipparone P. Jay L. (2019) Teaching content in practice: Investigating rehearsals of social studies discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 1–11 10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.017
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kavanagh S. S. Rainey E. (2017) Learning to support adolescent literacy: Teacher educator pedagogy and novice teacher take up in secondary English language arts teacher preparation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 904–937 10.3102/0002831217710423
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kelly S. (2008) Race, social class, and student engagement in middle school English classrooms. Social Science Research, 37(2), 434–448.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kennedy M. (2016) Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 6–17.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kucan L. Palincsar A. S. Busse T. Heisey N. Klingelhofer R. Rimbey M. Schutz K. (2011) Applying the Grossman et al. theoretical framework: The case of reading. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2897–2921.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ladson-Billings G. (2014) Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84 10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lampert M. Franke M. L. Kazemi E. Ghousseini H. Turrou A. C. Beasley H. Crowe K. (2013) Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lee C. D. (2007) Culture, literacy, & learning: Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Levine S. (2014) Making interpretation visible with an affect-based strategy. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(3), 283–303 10.1002/rrq.71
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lortie D. (1975) Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. McDonald M. Kazemi E. Kavanagh S.S. (2013) Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 378–386.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mehan H. (1979) “What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18(4), 285–294.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Meneses A. Hugo E. García M. de los Á. Müller M. (2018) Facilitating academic text-based discussions in initial teacher education: Evaluating specialized knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 119–130 10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.019
    [Google Scholar]
33. Michaels S. O’Connor C. (2012) Talk science primer. Cambridge, MA: TERC Retrieved fromhttps://inquiryproject.terc.edu/shared/pd/TalkScience_Primer.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
34. Michaels S. O’Connor C. (2015) Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussion. InResnick L. B. Asterhan C. Clarke S. (Eds.) Socializing intelligence through talk and dialogue (pp.347–362). American Educational Research Association.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Michaels S. O’Connor C. Resnick L. B. (2008) Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297 10.1007/s11217‑007‑9071‑1
    [Google Scholar]
36. Murphy P. K. Wilkinson I. A. G. Soter A. O. Hennessey M. N. Alexander J. F. (2009) Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764 10.1037/a0015576
    [Google Scholar]
37. Nystrand M. (2006) Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 392–412.
    [Google Scholar]
38. O’Connor C. Michaels S. (2007) When is dialogue “dialogic”?Human Development, 50(5), 275–285 10.1159/000106415
    [Google Scholar]
39. Parker W. C. Hess D. (2001) Teaching with and for discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(3), 273–289.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Philip T. M. Souto-Manning M. Anderson L. Horn I. Carter Andrews D. J. Stillman J. Varghese M. (2019) Making justice peripheral by constructing practice as “core”: How the increasing prominence of core practices challenges teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 251–264.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Schieble M. Vetter A. Martin K. M. (2020) Classroom talk for social change: Critical conversations in English language arts. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Soter A. O. Wilkinson I. A. Murphy P. K. Rudge L. Reninger K. Edwards M. (2008) What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 372–391.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Vaid-Menon A. (2017) Identity blues. Femme in public. Self-published.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Vetter A. Schieble M. Meacham M. (2018) Critical conversations in English education: Discursive strategies for examining how teacher and student identities shape classroom discourse. English Education, 50(3), 255–282.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Von Esch K. Kavanagh S. S. (2018) Preparing mainstream classroom teachers of English language learner (EL) students: Grounding practice-based designs for teacher learning in theories of expertise development. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 239–251 10.1177/0022487117717467
    [Google Scholar]
46. Zeichner K. (2012) The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376–382 10.1177/0022487112445789
    [Google Scholar]