Multimodal Cuentos as Fugitive Literacies on the Mexico-US Borderlands

References

1. Anzaldúa G. (1987) Borderlands: La frontera, 3). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barnd N. B. (2017) Native space: Geographic strategies to unsettle settler colonialism. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Butler T. (2017) #Say[ing]HerName as critical demand: English education in the age of erasure. English Education, 49(2), 153–178.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cacho L. M. (2012) Social death: Racialized rightlessness and the criminalization of the unprotected. New York: NYU Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Campano G. Ghiso M. P. Yee M. Pantoja A. (2013) Toward community research and coalitional literacy practices for educational justice. Language Arts, 90(5), 314–326.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cobos C. (2012) Embodied stornsying, a methodology for Chican@ rhetorics: (Re) making stories,(un)mapping the lines, and re-membering bodies. Doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M University.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Coleman N. A. T. (2014, April 25 The Atlantic Ocean is not the only black sea. Futures of Black studies: Historicity, Objectives, and Methodologies, Ethics Conference. University of Bremen Retrieved fromhttps://www.academia.edu/4998644/The_Atlantic_Ocean_is_not_the_only_Black_Sea
   [Google Scholar]
8. de la Piedra M. T. Araujo B. Esquinca A. (2018) Educating across borders: The case of a dual language program on the US-Mexico border. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. de los Ríos C. V. (2018) Toward a corridista consciousness: Learning from one transnational youth’s critical reading, writing, and performance of Mexican corridos. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(4), 455–471.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Del Hierro V. J. (2019) DJs, playlists, and community: Imagining communication design through hip hop. Communication Design Quarterly, 7(2), 28–39.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Delgado Bernal D. Alemán E. Jr. 2017) Transforming educational pathways for Chicana/o students: A critical race feminista praxis. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Durá L. Salas C. Medina-Jerez W. Hill V. (2015) De aquí y de allá: Changing perceptions of literacy through food pedagogy, asset-based narratives, and hybrid spaces. Community Literacy Journal, 10(1), 21–39.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fierros C. O. Delgado Bernal D. (2016) Vamos a platicar: The contours of pláticas as Chicana/Latina feminist methodology. Chicana/Latina Studies, 15(2), 98–121.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Flores T. (2018) Chicas fuertes: Counterstories of Latinx parents raising strong girls. Bilingual Research Journal, 41(3), 329–348.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fránquiz M. A. Ortiz A. A. (2017) Co-editors’ introduction: Who arethe transfronterizos and what can we learn from them?Bilingual Research Journal, 40(2), 111–115 10.1080/15235882.2017.1329378
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gonzales L. (2015) Multimodality, translingualism, and rhetorical genre studies. Composition Forum (pp.31 Retrieved fromhttps://compositionforum.com/issue/31/multimodality.php
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gonzales L. (2018) Sites of translation: What multilinguals can teach us about digital writing and rhetoric. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Indigenous Corporate Training Inc (2016) Indigenous people’s terminology guidelines for usage. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ictinc.ca/blog/indigenous-peoples-terminology-guidelines-for-usage
    [Google Scholar]
19. Keating A. (2006) From borderlands and new mestizas to nepantlas and nepantleras: Anzaldúan theories for social change. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 4(3), 5–16.
    [Google Scholar]
20. King L. Gubele R. Anderson J. R. (2015) Introduction: Careful with the stories we tell: Naming survivance, sovereignty, and story. InKing L. Gubele R. Anderson J. R. (Eds.), Survivance, sovereignty, and story: Teaching American Indian rhetorics (pp.3–16). Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mendoza Aviña S. (2016) “That’s ratchet”: A Chicana feminist rasquache pedagogy as entryway to understanding the material realities of contemporary Latinx elementary-aged youth. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(4), 468–479.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mignolo W. (2000) The many faces of cosmo-polis: Border thinking and critical cosmopolitanism. Public Culture, 12(3), 721–748.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Noguerón-Liu S. Hogan J. J. (2017) Remembering Michoacán: Digital representations of the homeland by immigrant adults and adolescents. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(3), 267–289.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Nuñez I. (2018) Literacies of surveillance: Transfronterizo children translanguaging identity across borders, inspectors and surveillance. Doctoral dissertation
    [Google Scholar]
25. Nuñez I. (2019) “Le hacemos la lucha”: Learning from Madres Mexicanas’ multimodal approaches to raising bilingual, biliterate children. Language Arts, 97(1), 7–16.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ohito E. (2020) “The creative aspect woke me up”: Awakening to multimodal essay composition as a fugitive literacy practice. English Education, 52(3), 186–222.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Otheguy R. García O. Wallis R. (2015) Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistic Review, 6(3), 281–307.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Patel L. L. (2012) Youth held at the border: Immigration, education, and the politics of inclusion. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Patterson O. (1982) Slavery and social death: A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pérez E. (1999) The decolonial imaginary: Writing Chicanas into history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Perez Huber L. (2016) Constructing “deservingness”: DREAMers and Central American unaccompanied children in the national immigration debate. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 9(3), 22–34.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Relaño Pastor A. M. (2007) On border identities. “Transfronterizo” students in San Diego. Diskurs Kindheits-und Jugendforschung, 2(3), 263–277.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sandoval C. (2013) Methodology of the oppressed, 18). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Smith L. T. (2012) Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Torrez J. E. (2013) Somos Mexicanos y hablamos Mexicano aqui: Rural farmworker families struggle to maintain cultural and linguistic identity in Michigan. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 12(4), 277–294.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Torrez J. E. Gonzales L. Del Hierro V. Ramos S. Cuevas E. (2019) Comunidad de cuentistas: Making space for Indigenous & Latinx storytellers. English Journal, 108(3), 44–50.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tyler R. C. (1972) Fugitive slaves in Mexico. The Journal of Negro History, 57(1), 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Valenzuela A. (1999) Subtractive schooling: Issues of caring in education of US-Mexican youth. New York: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Von Gleich P. (2017) Fugitivity against the border: Afro pessimism, fugitivity, and the border to social death. InWoons M. Weir S. (Eds.), Critical epistemologies of global politics (pp.203–215). Bristol, England: E-International Relations.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wilderson F. B. Von Gleich P. Spatzek S. (2016) “The Inside-Outside of Civil Society”: An Interview with Frank B. Wilderson, III. Black Studies Papers, 2(1), 4–22.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Yosso T. J. (2005) Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
    [Google Scholar]