Skip to content
2018
Volume 88, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0010-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8178
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce2025882229
2025-12-01
2026-05-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexander Jonathan. Writing and Desire: Queer Ways of Composing. U of Pittsburgh P 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Caswell Nicole I. “Dynamic Patterns: Emotional Episodes within Teachers’ Response Practices.” Journal of Writing Assessment, vol. 7, no. 1 2014, journalofwritingassessment.org/article.php?article=76.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper Marilyn. “Rhetorical Agency as Emergent and Enacted.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 62, no. 3 2011, pp 420–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Danielewicz Jane, and Elbow Peter. “A Unilateral Grading Contract to Improve Learning and Teaching.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 61, no. 2 2009, pp 244–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Duranti Alessandro. “Agency in Language.” A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, edited by Duranti Alessandro, Blackwell 2004, pp 451–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Elbow Peter. “Getting Along without Grades—and Getting Along with Them Too.” Everyone Can Write: Essays Toward a Hopeful Theory of Writing and Teaching Writing, Oxford UP 2000, pp 399–421.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Elbow Peter. “Ranking, Evaluating, Liking: Sorting Out Three Forms of Judgment.” College English, vol. 55, no. 2 1993, pp 187–206.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Elliot Norbert. “A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment.” Journal of Writing Assessment, vol. 9, no. 1 2016, journalofwritingassessment.org/article.php?article=98.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Huot Brian. (Re)Articulating Writing Assessment for Teaching and Learning. Utah State UP 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jin Sophie. “Talking Consent.” Briarpatch 2022, briarpatchmagazine.com/articles/view/talking-consent.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kelly-Riley Diane, and Elliot Norbert, editors. Improving Outcomes: Disciplinary Writing, Local Assessment, and the Aim of Fairness. MLA 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. King Hayden, and Pasternak Shiri. “PART ONE Spectrum of Consent: How is Indigenous Consent Ignored, Coerced, Negotiated, or Enforced?” Yellowhead Institute 2019, redpaper.yellowheadinstitute.org/part-one-spectrum-of-consent. Red paper.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Livingston Violet. “Excerpts from Terms of Play: Poetics on Consent as Method.” Peitho, vol. 23, no. 1 2020, wac.colostate.edu/docs/peitho/article/excerpts-from-terms-of-play-poetics-on-consent-as-method.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Livingston Violet. The Queer Art and Rhetoric of Consent: Theories, Practices, Pedagogies 2015 Michigan State U, PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McLaughlin Margaret A., and Agnew Eleanor. “Teacher Attitudes toward African American Language Patterns.” Attending to the Margins: Writing, Researching, and Teaching on the Front Lines, edited by Kells Michelle Hall and Balester Valerie, Boynton/Cook 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. O’Neill Peggy, Moore Cindy, and Huot Brian. Guide to College Writing Assessment. UP of Colorado 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Oleksiak Timothy. “Composing Consent as a Response to the Challenge of Openness.” College English, vol. 84, no. 5 2022, pp 429–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Oleksiak Timothy. “A Queer Praxis for Peer Review.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 52, no. 2 2020, pp 306–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Oleksiak Timothy. “Slow Peer Review in the Writing Classroom.” Pedagogy, vol. 22, no. 2 2021, pp 369–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Shapiro Shawna, Cox Michelle, Shuck Gail, and Simnitt Emily. “Teaching for Agency: From Appreciating Linguistic Diversity to Empowering Student Writers.” Composition Studies, vol. 44, no. 1 2016, pp 31–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Slomp David. “An Integrated Design and Appraisal Framework for Ethical Writing Assessment.” Journal of Writing Assessment, vol. 9, no. 1 2016, journalofwritingassessment.org/article.php?article=91.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. West-Puckett Stephanie. “Making Classroom Writing Assessment More Visible, Equitable, and Portable through Digital Badging.” College English, vol. 79, no. 2 2016, pp 127–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. West-Puckett Stephanie, I. Caswell Nicole, and Banks William P.. Failing Sideways: Queer Possibilities for Writing Assessment. UP of Colorado 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Yancey Kathleen Blake. “Looking Back as We Look Forward: Historicizing Writing Assessment.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 50, no. 3 1999, pp 483–503.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/ce2025882229
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ce2025882229
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test