oa John Franklin Genung and the Long, Troubled History of Writing Transfer

References

1. Allen R. R. “The Rhetoric of John Franklin Genung.” The Speech Teacher, vol. 12, no. 3 1963, pp 238–41, doi:10.1080/03634526309377306.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Amherst College Archives and Special Collections. acdc.amherst.edu/view/Catalogs/catalogueofamher1884amhe. Accessed 26 Apr. 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Amherst College Catalog 1884/1885. Amherst College Catalogs (Selections). acdc.amherst.edu/view/Catalogs.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anson Chris, and Moore Jessie. Afterword. Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transfer edited by Anson Chris and Moore Jessie, UP of Colorado 2016, pp 331–39.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baird Theodore. “The Teaching of English and the English Department of Amherst College From 1852 to 1927” (part 1 of 2), undated, Box 11, Folder 12. Theodore and Frances Titchener Baird Papers, MA.01013. Amherst College Archives and Special Collections.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baker-Bell April. Linguistic Justice: Black Language, Literacy, Identity, and Pedagogy. Routledge 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Beach King. “Consequential Transitions: A Developmental View of Knowledge Propagation Through Social Organizations.” Between School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary Crossing edited by Tuomi-Gröhn Terttu and Engeström Yrjö, Pergamon 2003, pp 39–61.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Berlin James A. “John Genung and Contemporary Composition Theory: The Triumph of the Eighteenth Century.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 2 1981, pp 74–84.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bigge Morris L. Learning Transfer for Teachers. 2nd ed. Harper and Row 1971.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bigge Morris L. Writing Instruction in Nineteenth-Century American Colleges. Studies in Writing and Rhetoric. Southern Illinois UP 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Blume Oeur Freeden. “Object Lessons: W. E. B. Du Bois and the Sturm und Drang of Race Childhood.” Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth, vol. 14, no. 3 2021, pp 437–60, doi:10.1353/hcy.2021.0042.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Brent Doug. “Transfer, Transformation, and Rhetorical Knowledge: Insights from Transfer Theory.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 25, no. 4 2011, pp 396–420, doi:10.1177/1050651911410951.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Brereton John C. editor The Origins of Composition Studies in the American College, 1875–1925. U of Pittsburgh P 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Connors Robert J. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. U of Pittsburgh P 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Crowley Sharon. Composition in the University: Historical and Polemical Essays. U of Pittsburgh P 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cruikshank Kathleen. “Herbartianismus als Paradigma für Professionalisierung und Schulreform: Ein Beitrag zur Bündner Schulgeschichte der Jahre 1880 bis 1930 und zur Wirkungsgeschichte der Pädagogik Herbarts und der Herbartianer Ziller, Stoy und Rein in der Schweiz.” History of Education Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3 1996, pp 335–37, doi:10.2307/369405.
    [Google Scholar]
17. “Current Educational Literature.” The School Review, vol. 1, no. 4 1893, pp 253–61.
    [Google Scholar]
18. DePalma Michael-John, and Ringer Jeffrey M.. “Toward a Theory of Adaptive Transfer: Expanding Disciplinary Discussions of ‘Transfer’ in Second-Language Writing and Composition Studies.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 20, no. 2 2011, pp 134–47.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Devet Bonnie. “The Writing Center and Transfer of Learning: A Primer for Directors.” The Writing Center Journal, vol. 35, no. 1 2015, pp 119–51.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dewey John. Interest in Relation to Training of the Will. 2nd ed. U of Chicago P 1903 [1895] HathiTrust, hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015063772852.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Donahue Christiane. “Transfer, Portability, Generalization: (How) Does Composition Expertise ‘Carry’?” Exploring Composition Studies: Sites, Issues, and Perspectives edited by Ritter Kelly and Matsuda Paul Kei, Utah State UP 2012, pp 145–66.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Donahue Patricia, and Moon Gretchen Flesher editors Local Histories: Reading the Archives of Composition. U of Pittsburgh P 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dunkel Harold B. “Herbart’s Pedagogical Seminar.” History of Education Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 1 1967, pp 93–101.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Dunkel Harold B. “Herbartianism Comes to America: Part I.” History of Education Quarterly, vol. 9, no. 2 1969, pp 202–33.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Eby Frederick. Development of Modern Education. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall 1952.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ettlich Earnest Earl. “John Franklin Genung and the Nineteenth Century Definition of Rhetoric.” Central States Speech Journal, vol. 17, no. 4 1966, pp 283–88.
    [Google Scholar]
27. “Evolve.” OED Online, Oxford UP, Mar. 2023, oed.com/view/Entry/65458. Accessed 20 Mar. 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Fallace Thomas D. Dewey and the Dilemma of Race: An Intellectual History, 1895–1922. Teachers College P 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Fallace Thomas D. “Recapitulation Theory and the New Education: Race, Culture, Imperialism, and Pedagogy, 1894–1916.” Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 42, no. 4 2012, pp 510–33.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Foucault Michel. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” The Foucault Reader edited by Rabinow Paul, Vintage Books 2010, pp 76–100.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Frieden Jeffrey A. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century. Norton 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Frink Henry Allyn. “A Lesson from Hamlet for Modern Educators,” 1892–1893, Folder 4. Amherst College Non-Alumni Biographical Files, MA.00369. Amherst College Archives and Special Collections.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Frink Henry Allyn. “Rhetoric and Public Speaking in the American College,” 1892–1893, Folder 4. Amherst College Non-Alumni Biographical Files, MA.00369. Amherst College Archives and Special Collections.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gates Arthur I. Psychology for Students of Education. Macmillan 1923.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Genung John Franklin. Date Book for 1913. MS. Genung Box. Amherst College Archives and Special Collections.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Genung John Franklin. Handbook of Rhetorical Analysis: Studies in Style and Invention. Ginn and Company 1898.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Genung John Franklin. The Life Indeed: A Review, in Common Thinking, of the Scripture History Issuing in Immortality, The Life Indeed, Folders 1–3. Amherst College Archives and Special Collections.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Genung John Franklin. The Practical Elements of Rhetoric. 1887. Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Genung John Franklin. Selections for Rhetorical Analysis. 1884–1914, Folder 6. Amherst College Non-Alumni Biographical Files, MA.00369. Amherst College Archives and Special Collections.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Genung John Franklin. The Study of Rhetoric in the College Course. Boston: D. C. Heath and Co. 1887 HathiTrust, hdl.handle.net/2027/hvd.hwxy8w.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Genung John Franklin. “The Teacher’s Outfit in Rhetoric.” The School Review, vol. 7, no. 3 1895, pp 405–22.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Gold David. “Remapping Revisionist Historiography.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 64, no. 1 2012, pp 15–34.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Gold David. Rhetoric at the Margins: Revising the History of Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1873–1947. Southern Illinois UP 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Golden James L., and Corbett Edward P. J.. The Rhetoric of Blair, Campbell, and Whately. Southern Illinois UP 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Gray Patrice K. “Life in the Margins: Student Writing and Curricular Change at Fitchburg Normal, 1895–1910.” Local Histories: Reading the Archives of Composition edited by Donahue Patricia and Moon Gretchen Flesher, U of Pittsburgh P 2007, pp 159–80.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Grose Robert F., and Birney Robert C.. Transfer of Learning: An Enduring Problem in Psychology. Van Nostrand 1963.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Harpine William D. “Genung’s Theory of Persuasion: A Literary Theory of Oratory of Late Nineteenth-Century America.” Advances in the History of Rhetoric, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 31–43.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Heck W. H. Mental Discipline and Educational Values. 2nd ed. John Lane 1911.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Herbart Johann Friedrich. Outlines of Educational Doctrine Translated by Lange Alexis F. annotated by DeGarmo Charles, Macmillan 1901.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Herbart Johann Friedrich. The Science of Education: Its General Principles Deduced from Its Aim; and, The Aesthetic Revelation of the World Translated by Felkin Henry M. and Felkin Emmie, D. C. Heath and Co. 1900.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Isocrates. On the Peace. Areopagiticus. Against the Sophists. Antidosis. Panathenaicus Translated by Norlin George. Loeb Classical Library 229. Harvard UP 1929.
    [Google Scholar]
52. James William. The Principles of Psychology. vol. 1. Henry Holt and Company 1890.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Jarratt Susan C. “Classics and Counterpublics in Nineteenth-Century Historically Black Colleges.” College English, vol. 72, no. 2 2009, pp 134–59.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Judd Charles H. Educational Psychology. Houghton Mifflin 1939.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kelly Mike, and Duke Katherine. “People, Protest, Purpose: A College Timeline.” Amherst Magazine, 13 Oct. 2021, amherst.edu/news/magazine/issues/2021-fall/people-protestpurpose.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kitzhaber Albert. Rhetoric in the American College, 1850–1900. Southern Methodist UP 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Kolesnik Walter B. Mental Discipline in Modern Education. U of Wisconsin P 1958.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Koopman Colin. Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity. Indiana UP 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Lerner Neil. The Idea of a Writing Laboratory. Southern Illinois UP 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
60. “The N. E. A. at Denver.” The School Review, vol. 3, no. 7 1895, pp 422–33.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Nowacek Rebecca S., Leonard Rebecca Lorimer, and Rounsaville Angela. Writing Knowledge Transfer: Theory, Research, Pedagogy. Parlor Press 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Perkins David N., and Salomon Gavriel. “Transfer of Learning.” International Encyclopedia of Education. 2nd ed. Pergamon 1992, pp 2–13.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Plato. Phaedrus and Letters VII and VIII Translated by Hamilton Walter, Penguin Books 1973.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Relerford Jimisha. “Looking Back in Composition Studies: What a Narrative History of Composition at HBCUs Can Contribute to the Field Today.” CLA Journal, vol. 56, no. 2 2012, pp 116–28.
    [Google Scholar]
65. “Rhetoric Course Description, 1886–1887.” Amherst College Catalogs, 1886–1887. Amherst College Digital Collections, acdc.amherst.edu/view/Catalogs.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Ringer Jeff, and Morey Sean. “Posthumanizing Writing Transfer.” College English, vol. 83, no. 4 2021, pp 289–311.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Rockas Leo. “The Quintilian of Amherst: John Franklin Genung.” The New England Quarterly, vol. 54, no. 1 1981, pp 54–73.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Royster Jacqueline Jones. Traces of a Stream: Literacy and Social Change among African American Women. U of Pittsburgh P 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Russell David R. Writing in the Academic Disciplines, 1870–1990: A Curricular History. Southern Illinois UP 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Said Edward W. “Traveling Theory.” The World, The Text, and The Critic. Harvard UP 1983, pp 226–47.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Said Edward W. “Traveling Theory Reconsidered.” Reflection on Exile and Other Essays. Harvard UP 2000, pp 436–52.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Stoskopf Alan. “Echoes of a Forgotten Past: Eugenics, Testing, and Education Reform.” The Educational Forum, vol. 66, no. 2 2002, pp 126–33.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Thorndike Edward L., and Woodworth Robert S.. “The Influence of Improvement in One Mental Function Upon the Efficiency of Other Functions, I–III.” Psychological Review, vol. 8, nos. 3, 4, and 6 1901, pp 247–61, 384–95, and 553–64.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Trimbur John. “Literacy and the Discourse of Crisis.” The Politics of Writing Instruction: Postsecondary edited by Bullock Richard and Trimbur John, Boynton/Cook 1991, pp 277–95.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Tuomi-Gröhn Terttu, and Engeström Yrjö. “Conceptualizing Transfer: From Standard Notions to Developmental Perspectives.” Between School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary Crossing edited by Tuomi-Gröhn Terttu and Engeström Yrjö, Emerald Group 2003, pp 19–38.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Varnum Robin. “From Crisis to Crisis: The Evolution Toward Higher Standards of Literacy in the United States.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3 1986, pp 145–65.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Wardle Elizabeth. “Understanding ‘Transfer’ from FYC: Preliminary Results of a Longitudinal Study.” WPA: Writing Program Administration, vol. 31, nos. 1–2 2007, pp 65–85.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Weidner Heidemarie Z. “A Chair ‘Perpetually Filled by a Female Professor’: Rhetoric and Composition Instruction at Nineteenth-Century Butler University.” Local Histories: Reading the Archives of Composition edited by Donahue Patricia and Moon Gretchen Flesher, U of Pittsburgh P 2007, pp 58–76.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Woods William F. “Nineteenth-Century Psychology and the Teaching of Writing.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 36, no. 1 1985, pp 20–41.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Yancey Kathleen Blake, Robertson Liane, and Taczak Kara. Writing Across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing. Utah State UP 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Zaluda Scott. “Lost Voices of the Harlem Renaissance: Writing Assigned at Howard University, 1919–31.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 50, no. 2 1998, pp 232–57.
    [Google Scholar]