And Gladly Teach: Teaching with Paired Texts: Shakespeare and the Violence of the Law

References

1. Ajanaku Mufasa. “Hip? Hop?” Hourglass Journal, fall 2021, hourglassjournal.org/2021/08/24/hip-hop/.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alexander Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New Press 2012.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bakhtin Mikhail. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Edited by Holquist Michael, translated by Emerson Caryl and Holquist Michaell U of Texas P 1981.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakhtin Mikhail. “Dialogic Origin and Dialogic Pedagogy of Grammar: Stylistics as Part of Russian Language Instruction in Secondary School.” Translated by Gogotishvili L. A.. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, vol. 42, no. 6 2004, pp 12–50.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bakhtin Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Edited and translated by Emerson Caryl, U of Minnesota P 2013.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bakhtin Mikhail. “Bakhtin on Shakespeare: Excerpt from Additions and Changes to Rabelais.’” Translated by Sandler Sergeiy, PMLA, vol. 129, no. 3 2014, pp 522–37.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Battista Janine. “Recognizing Home in the Tanakh.” Hourglass Journal, spring 2020, hourglassjournal.org/2021/03/10/essay-title/.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Beccaria Cesare.On Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings. Edited by Bellamy Richard translated by Davies Richard,Cambridge UP 1995.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beer Gillian.Forging the Missing Link: Interdisciplinary Stories, Inaugural Lecture. Cambridge UP 1992.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cardi Vincent. “Litigation as Violence.” Wake Forest Law Review, vol. 49, no. 677 2014, pp 677–86.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Clark Michael. “Lost Treasure.” Hourglass Journal, fall 2021, hourglassjournal.org/2021/08/23/lost-treasure.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cover Robert. “Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard Law Review, vol. 97 1984, pp 4–26.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cover Robert. “Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal, vol. 95 1986, pp 1601–29.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cunningham Karen.Imaginary Betrayals: Subjectivity and the Discourses of Treason in Early Modern England. U of Pennsylvania P 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Death Penalty Information Center. “Executions Database.” 2022, deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions/execution-database.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dolin Kieran.A Critical Introduction to Law and Literature. Cambridge UP 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Evans David. “The Elevating Connection of Higher Education in Prison: An Incarcerated Student’s Perspective.” Critical Pedagogy, vol. 9, no. 12 2018, pp 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Evans G. Blakemore, and Tobin J. J. M. editors The Riverside Shakespeare. 2nd ed., Houghton Mifflin 1997
    [Google Scholar]
19. “Finding Community Sarah Higinbotham,” Oxford College of Emory University 2020, higinbotham.lmc.gatech.edu/finding-community.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fine Cordelia.Testosterone Rex: Myths of Sex, Science, and Society. W. W. Norton 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Foucault Michel.The Foucault Reader edited by Rabinow Paul, Random House 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gentner Dedre Holyoak Keith J., Kokinov Boicho N. editors The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Bradford Books 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gentner Dedre and Markman Arthur B.. “Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity.” American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 1 1997, pp 45–56.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gentner Dedre and Namy Laura L.. “Comparison in the Development of Categories.” Cognitive Development, vol. 14 1999, pp 487–513.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Greenblatt Stephen. “Shakespeare’s Cure for Xenophobia: What The Merchant of Venice Taught Me About Ethnic Hatred and the Literary Imagination.” The New Yorker, 3 July 2017, newyorker.com/magazine/2017/07/10/shakespeares-cure-for-xenophobia.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hadfield Andrew. “The Power and Rights of the Crown in Hamlet and King Lear: ‘The King— The King’s to Blame.” The Review of English Studies, vol. 54, no. 217 2003, pp 566–86.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Halasek Kay.A Pedagogy of Possibility: Bakhtinian Perspectives on Composition Studies. Southern Illinois UP 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Harrison Keith.Shakespeare, Bakhtin, and Film: A Dialogic Lens. Palgrave 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Henry Leslie Meltzer. “The Jurisprudence of Dignity.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 160 2011, pp 169–233.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Higinbotham Sarah. “Reform Movements in Justice.” The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America. Sage 2013, pp 1514–18.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hutson Lorna.The Invention of Suspicion: Law and Mimesis in Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama. Oxford UP 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Jay Martin. “Must Justice Be Blind? The Challenge of Images to the Law.” Law and Image: The Authority of Art and the Aesthetics of Law edited by Douzinas Costas and Nead Lynda, U Chicago P 1999, pp 19–35.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kaeble Danielle.US Department of Justice, Probation and Parole in the United States, 2020, bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/probation-and-parole-united-states-2020.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kahn Paul.Law and Love: The Trials of King Lear. Yale UP 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kahn Victoria and Huston Lorna editors Rhetoric and Law in Early Modern Europe. Yale UP 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
36. King Martin Luther Jr. “The Birth of a New Nation.” Sermon delivered at Dexter Avenue Baptist Church, 7 April 1957.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lemon Rebecca.Treason by Words: Literature, Law, and Rebellion in Shakespeare’s England. Cornell UP 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lupton Julia Reinhard.Thinking with Shakespeare: Essays on Politics and Life. U of Chicago P 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Manderson Desmond.Songs Without Music: Aesthetic Dimensions of Law and Justice. U of California P 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Markman Art. “Since Your Brain Constantly Compares You with Everyone Else, Try This.” Fast Company, 13 Oct 2017, fastcompany.com/40480528/since-your-brain-constantly-compares-you-with-everyone-else-try-this.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Matveev Alexi V., and Milter Richard G.. “The Value of Intercultural Competence for Performance of Multicultural Teams.” Team Performance Management, vol. 10, nos. 5–6 2004, pp 104–11.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Mukherji Subha.Law and Representation in Early Modern Drama. Cambridge UP 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
43. National Institute of Corrections. “Georgia: Corrections Statistics by State 2019.” nicic.gov/state-statistics/2019/eorgia-2019.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Nour Sacad. “Ramadan as Reconciliation.” Hourglass Journal, spring 2021, hourglassjournal.org/2021/03/10/ramadan-and-reconciliation.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Novy Marianne.Shakespeare and Outsiders. Mariann UP 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
46. “Oxford Students Visit Prison, Present to State Legislature on College Courses for Incarcerated People.” Emory College News Archive, 18 April 2023, emory.edu/news/2022/04/students-visit-prisons-state-legislature.html.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Peters Julie Stone.Law as Performance: Theatricality, Spectatorship, and the Making of Law in Ancient, Medieval, and Early Modern Europe. Oxford UP 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Peters Julie Stone. “Law, Literature, and the Vanishing Real: On the Future of an Interdisciplinary Illusion.” PMLA, vol. 120, no. 2 2005, pp 442–53.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Pleiss Kathleen Rosann. “Disposable Bodies: Human Dignity and Incarceration in the United States.” 2021 Emory U, BA honors thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Prison Policy Initiative. “States of Incarceration: The Global Context 2021.” prisonpolicy.org/global/2021.html.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Ripa Cesare.Iconologia. Facsimile. Introductory notes by Stephen Orgel. Garland 1593 (1979).
    [Google Scholar]
52. Rittle-Johnson Bethany, and Star Jon R.. “Compared with What? The Effects of Different Comparisons on Conceptual Knowledge and Procedural Flexibility for Equation Solving.” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 101, no. 3 2009, pp 529–44.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sarat Austin editor Law, Violence, and the Possibility of Justice. Princeton UP 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Sarat Austin Frank Catherine O., and Anderson Matthew editors Teaching Law and Literature. MLA 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Schur Anna. “Flourishing or Perishing? Law and Literature Airbrushed.” Law and Literature, vol. 26, no. 1 2014, pp 105–16.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Shakespeare William.King Lear. Evans and Tobin, pp. 1297–1354.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Shakespeare William.Measure for Measure. Evans and Tobin, pp. 579–622.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Shakespeare William.The Merchant of Venice. Evans and Tobin, pp. 284–319.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Shakespeare William.The Tempest. Evans and Tobin, pp. 1656–88.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Shakespeare Theater Company. The Merchant of Venice 2022, shakespearetheatre.org/events/the-merchant-of-venice-21-22.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Paul Shupack, “Natural Justice and King Lear,” Law and Literature, vol. 9, no. 1 1997, pp 67–105.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Simon Jonathan.Mass Incarceration on Trial: A Remarkable Court Decision and the Future of Prisons in America. New Press 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Smith Murry. “Lear’s Tyranny in Gaddafi’s Libya.” Forbes and Fifth, vol. 7 2015, forbes5.pitt.edu/issue/volume-7-fall-2015.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Smith Preston. “Georgia Tech Track Stars Give Atlanta Kids a Running Start.” Atlanta Journal Constitution, 5 July 2018, ajc.com/blog/get-schooled/georgia-tech-track-stars-give-kids-with-jailed-parents-running-start/jPG4iF4ryXFYEE5Rt1QC3I.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Snell Tracy L. US Department of Justice, “Capital Punishment Statistical Tables, 2021,” bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/capital-punishment-2020-statistical-tables.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Strasburger Larry H. “The Litigant-Patient: Mental Health Consequences of Civil Litigation.” Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry Law, vol. 27, no. 2 1999, pp 203–11.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Tarwater Charles. “The Mind Oppressed: Recidivism as a Learned Behavior.” Wake Forest Journal of Law and Policy, vol. 6, no. 2 2016, pp 357–69.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Teo Peter. “Teaching for the 21st Century: A Case for Dialogic Pedagogy.” Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, vol. 21 2019, pp 170–78.
    [Google Scholar]
69. United States, Supreme Court. Brown, et al. v. Plata, et. al. 23 May 2011 Justicia, supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/563/493. White James Boyd. The Legal Imagination. U of Chicago P, 1985.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Wolfram Jack. “Saturday Night Lear: ‘SNL’ Cast as Today’s Shakespearian Fools.” Apollon Undergraduate Journal, 17 Dec 2020, apollonejournal.org/apollon-journal/saturday-night-lear-snl-cast-as-todays-shakespearian-fools.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Yancey Kathleen editor A Rhetoric of Reflection. Utah State UP 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Yoshino Kenji.A Thousand Times More Fair: What Shakespeare’s Plays Teach Us About Justice. HarperCollins 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Zehr Howard.Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Herald Press 2005.
    [Google Scholar]