Skip to content
2018
Volume 85, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0010-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8178
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce202232100
2022-09-01
2023-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. “About.” Georgia State University gsu.edu/about Accessed 10 Aug. 2021
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler-Kassner Linda Gonzalez Gonzalez Lorna “‘Everybody Writes’: Accreditation-Based Assessment as Professional Development at a Research Intensive University.”. Sharer et al 24262
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker-Bell April Linguistic Justice: Black Language, Literacy, Identity, and Pedagogy. NCTE / Routledge2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bean John C. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom 2nd ed., Jossey-Bass2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bensimon Estela Mara “Reclaiming Racial Justice in Equity, Change.” The Magazine of Higher Learning , vol.50nos. 3-42018, 9598 10.1080/00091383.2018.1509623
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Busser Cristine “Challenging the Efficiency Model: Supporting Inclusive Pathways Toward Student Success.” WPA: Writing Program Administration , vol.43no. 22020, 89108
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chemishanova Polina Miecznikowski Cynthia “Write to the Top: How One Regional University Made Writing Everybody’s Business.”. Sharer et al 21341
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Christie Angela. Interview Conducted by Jessica Edens McCrary and Ashley J. Holmes5Nov2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Collins Brennan. Interview Conducted by Jessica Edens McCrary and Ashley J. Holmes2Oct2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Council of Higher Education Accreditation “Regional Accrediting Organizations.” chea.org/regional-accrediting-organizations-accreditor-type Accessed 10 Aug. 2021
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cox Michelle Galin Jeffrey R. Melzer Dan Sustainable WAC: A Whole Systems Approach to Launching and Developing Writing Across the Curriculum Programs. NCTE2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Craig Sherri “Your Contract Grading Ain’t It.” WPA: Writing Program Administration , vol.44no. 32021, 14546
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cripps Michael J. Robinson Heather M. “Writing Program Building in a Compromised Space: Relative Agency in a Small College in a Public University System.” Composition Forum , vol.292014, compositionforum.com/issue/29/york-cuny.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. “Critical Thinking through Writing: Georgia State University’s Quality Enhancement Plan.” Georgia State University sacscoc.gsu.edu/files/2017/08/QEP_Final_Draft1.pdf. report.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. “CTW: Frequently Asked Questions.” Georgia State University Critical Thinking through Writing Program Archives2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Debelius Maggie “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Assessment: Lessons from a Thresholds- Based Approach.”. Sharer et al 26378
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Elmore Jonathan Van Sickle Teressa “Going All In: Creating a Community College Writing Program Through the QEP and Reaccreditation Process.”. Sharer et al 6786
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Finn Mary. Interview Conducted by Jessica Edens McCrary and Ashley J. Holmes20Oct2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. “Georgia State University’s Quality Enhancement Plan 5th Year Interim Report.” cetl.gsu.edu/ files/2019/02/QEP_Impact_Report.pdf Accessed Dec. 2019 and Mar. 2022
    [Google Scholar]
  20. “Georgia State Near Top in Innovation, Teaching in U.S. News & World Report 2021 Survey.” Georgia State News Hub14Sept2020, news.gsu.edu/2020/09/14/georgia-state-near-top-in-innovation-teaching-in-u-s-news-world-report-2021-survey.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. “Georgia State Ranks No. 2 For Innovation, Remains Top Public University for Undergraduate Teaching In 2022 U.S. News & World Report Survey.” Georgia State News Hub13Sept2021, news.gsu.edu/2021/09/13/georgia-state-ranks-no-2-for-innovation-remains-top-public-university-for-undergraduate-teaching-in-2022-u-s-news-world-report-survey.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. “Georgia State Ranks No. 2 in Nation in Innovation No. 3 in Commitment To Teaching Rankings of U.S. News.” Georgia State News Hub9Sept2019, news.gsu.edu/2019/09/09/georgia-state- ranks-no-2-in-nation-in-innovation-no-3-in-commitment-to-teaching-rankings-of-u-s-news.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. “Georgia State Rises To No. 2 In Nation In U.S. News Innovation, Commitment To Teaching Rankings.” Georgia State News Hub18Sept2019, news.gsu.edu/2018/09/09/georgia-state-rises-to-no-2-in-nation-in-u-s-news-innovation-commitment-to-teaching-rankings.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Green Angela Saltiel Iris Christiansen Kyle “From the Outside In: Creating a Culture of Writing through a QEP”. Sharer et al 30427
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hall Jennifer. Interview Conducted by Jessica Edens McCrary and Ashley J. Holmes11Sept2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Harris Benjamin R. “Subversive Infusions: Strategies for the Integration of Information Literacy Across the Curriculum.” Journal of Academic Librarianship , vol.39no. 22013, 17580
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hocks Mary. Interview Conducted by Jessica Edens McCrary and Ashley J. Holmes4Sept2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. hooks bell. Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom. Routledge2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Inoue Asao B. “Classroom Writing Assessment as an Antiracist Practice: Confronting White Supremacy in the Judgments of Language.” Pedagogy , vol.19no. 32019, 373404
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Inoue Asao B. Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies: Teaching and Assessing for a Socially Just Future. WAC Clearinghouse / U of Colorado P2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jackson Rebecca Morton Deborah “Becoming Landscape Architects: A Postmodern Approach to WAC Sustainability.” WAC Journal , vol.18no. 12007, 4358 10.37514/WAC‑J.2007.18.1.04
    [Google Scholar]
  32. “LEAP Georgia.” University System of Georgia Accessed 15 Mar 2021 usg.edu/facultydevelopment/leap.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Loughman Thomas P. Hickson Joyce Sheeks Gina L. Hortman William J. “The Role of the Quality Enhancement Plan in Engendering a Culture of Assessment.” Assessment Update , vol.20no. 3May2008, 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Martin Eric V.. “WAC Paradoxes Revisited: A Program Director’s Response.” Pedagogy , vol.1no. 22001, 27586
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McIntyre Megan “Curating a Place to Begin: Creating Resources That Center the Work of Black and Indigenous Scholars and Other Scholars of Color.” WPA: Writing Program Administration , vol.44no. 32021, 17680
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Miller-Cochran Susan Rodrigo Rochelle “QEP Evaluation as Opportunity: Teaching and Learning Through the Accreditation Process.”. Sharer et al 3651
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Moore Cindy O’Neill Peggy Crow Angela “Assessing for Learning in an Age of Comparability: Remembering the Importance of Context.”. Sharer et al 1735
    [Google Scholar]
  38. “Motion to Add a University-Level Critical Thinking through Writing Requirement.” Georgia State University, Admissions and Standards Committee2007, senate.gsu.edu/files/2013/08/ Motion-to-revise-CTW-requirement-.pdf Accessed July 14 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Neff Joyce Bingham-Risher Remica “Faculty Learning Outcomes: The Impact of QEP Workshops on Faculty Beliefs and Practices.”. Sharer et al 279303
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nulton Karen Ingalls Rebecca “Centering and Decentering Assessment: Accountability, Accreditation, and Expertise.”. Sharer et al 14562
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Perryman-Clark Staci M. Lamont Craig Collin editors Black Perspectives in Writing Program Administration: From the Margins to the Center. Conference on College Composition and Communication / NCTE2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. “Preamble: From Action to Outcomes Georgia State University Is Central to the National Agenda.” Georgia State University2011, strategic.gsu.edu/preamble-2 Accessed 12 Mar. 2021 Strategic plan.
  43. Pullman George. Interview Conducted by Jessica Edens McCrary and Ashley J. Holmes5Nov2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rademaekers Justin K. “Getting Specific about Critical Thinking: Implications for Writing Across the Curriculum.” WAC Journal2018, 11946
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rainbolt George. Interview Conducted by Jessica Edens McCrary and Ashley J. Holmes15Oct2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rose Shirley K. “Understanding Accreditation’s History and Role in Higher Education.”. Sharer et al 5263
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sharer Wendy B. Ann Morse Tracey Eble Michelle F. Banks William P. editors Reclaiming Accountability: Improving Writing Programs through Accreditation and Large-Scale Assessments. Utah State UP2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Southern Association of College and Schools Commission on Colleges “Quality Enhancement Plans: Lists and Summaries Since 2004.” sacscoc.org/QEPSummaries.asp.sacscoc.org/quality-enhancement-plans/2008-track-b-qep-summaries Accessed 11 Mar. 2021
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Strauss Valerie “‘Harvard for the Masses’—at a Community College in Atlanta.” The Washington Post. 27June2021, washingtonpost.com/education/2021/06/27/harvard-community-college-success-atlanta.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sugar Tom “Dr. Tim Renick Shares GSU’s Playbook for Eliminating Equity Gaps.” Interview.. EAB [formerly Educational Advisory Board, a subsidiary of Vista Equity Partners]8Dec2020, eab.com/insights/podcast/student-success/gsus-playbook-for-eliminating-equity-gaps.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Summerhill Daniel Medina-Lopez Kelly Robinson Sam “Confronting the Comp Classroom: Implementing Anti-Racist Pedagogy and Navigating Opposition.” WPA: Writing Program Administration , vol.44no. 32021, 12127
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Walvoord Barbara E. “The Future of WAC.” College English , vol.58no. 11996, 5879
    [Google Scholar]
  53. “Writing Across the Curriculum.” Georgia State University cetl.gsu.edu/programs-grants-awards/ writing-across-curriculum.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ce202232100
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ce202232100
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error