Composing Consent as a Response to the Challenge of Openness

References

1. Ahmed Sara. The Promise of Happiness Duke UP2010.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aull Laura L.. “Civil Style: Reexamining Discourse and Rhetorical Listening in Composition.”, Style and the Future of Composition Studies edited by Butler Paul et al. Utah State UP2020 , pp.160–72. 10.7330/9781646420117.c010.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aull Laura L.. How Students Write: A Linguistic Analysis Modern Language Association of America2020.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bitzer Lloyd F.. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol.1, no 1 1968 , pp.1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bone Jennifer Emerling Griffin Cindy L. Linda Scholz T. M.. “Beyond Traditional Conceptualizations of Rhetoric: Invitational Rhetoric and a Move Toward Civility.” Western Journal of Communication, vol.72, no. 4 2008 , pp.434–62.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Booth Wayne C.. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent U of Chicago P1974.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chávez Karma R.. Queer Migration Politics: Activist Rhetoric and Coalitional Possibilities U of Illinois P2013.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cloud Dana L.. “’Civility’ as Threat to Academic Freedom.” First Amendment Studies, vol.49, no. 1 2015 , pp.13–17.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cloud Dana L.. Reality Bites: Rhetoric and the Circulation of Truth Claims in U.S. Political Culture The Ohio State UP2018.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Coles Romand. “Liberty, Equality, Receptive Generosity: Neo-Nietzschean Reflections on the Ethics and Politics of Coalition.” American Political Science Review, vol.90, no. 2 1996 , pp.375–388.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Corder Jim W.. “Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love.” Rhetoric Review, vol.4, no 1 1985 , pp.16–32.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Council of Writing Program Administrators National Council of Teachers of English, and National Writing Project Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dadas Caroline. “Making Sense of #MeToo: Intersectionality and Contemporary Feminism.” Peitho, vol.22, no. 3 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Duffy John. “Ethical Dispositions: A Discourse for Rhetoric and Composition.” JAC, vol.34, no. 1-2 2014 , pp.209–37.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fischel Joseph J.. Screw Consent: A Better Politics of Sexual Justice U of California P2019.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Flores Wilfredo. “Kink as Praxis: Typing Up Sex with Queer and Cultural Rhetorics.” Pre/Text, vol.24, no. 1–4 , pp.81–98.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Foss Sonja K. Griffin Cindy L.. “Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric.” Communication Monographs, vol.62 1995 , pp.2–18.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Friedman Jaclyn Valenti Jessica. Yes Means Yes!: Visions of Female Sexual Power and a World without Rape Seal Press2008.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gearhart Sally Miller. “The Womanization of Rhetoric.” Women’s Studies International Quarterly, vol.2 1979 , pp.195–201.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gross Daniel M. Alexander Jonathan. “Frameworks for Failure.” Pedagogy, vol.16, no. 2 2016 , pp.273–95.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Head Alison J. Fister Barbara MacMillan Margy. “Information Literacy in the Age of Algorithms: Student Experiences with News and Information and the Need for Change.” Project Information Literacy 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hsu V. Jo. “Rhetoric as Intimate Practice.” Rhetoric Review, vol.40, no. 4 2021 , pp.326–329.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hyland Ken. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing Michigan classics ed, U of Michigan P2004.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ichikawa Jonathan Jenkins. “Presupposition and Consent.” Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, vol.6, no. 4 2020 , pp.1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Inoue Asao B.. “How Do We Language So People Stop Killing Each Other, or What Do We Do about White Language Supremacy.” College Composition and Communication, vol.71, no. 2 2019 , pp.352–69.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jarratt Susan C.. “Feminism and Composition: The Case for Conflict.”, Contending with Words: Composition and Rhetoric in a Postmodern Age Modern Language Association of America1991 , pp.105–23.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Johnson Gavin P.. “From Rhetorical Eavesdropping to Rhetorical Foreplay: Orientations, Spacetimes, and the Emergence of a Queer Embodied Tactic.” Pre/Text, vol.24, no. 1–4 2018 , pp.119–38.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kukla Quill R.. “A Nonideal Theory of Sexual Consent.” Ethics, vol.131 2021 , pp.270–92.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kukla Quill (writing as Rebecca). “That’s What She Said: The Language of Sexual Negotiation.” Ethics, vol.129 2018 , pp.70–97.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kulbaga Theresa A. Spencer Leland G.. Campuses of Consent: Sexual and Social Justice in Higher Education U of Massachusetts P2019.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Livingston Violet (writing under Kathleen Ann Livingston). The Queer Art & Rhetoric of Consent: Theories, Practices, Pedagogies U of Michigan P2015 https://d.lib.msu.edu/etd/3645/datastream/OBJ/view.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Livingston Violet (writing under Kathleen Ann Livingston). “On Rage, Shame, ‘Realness,’ and Accountability to Survivors.” Harlot: A Revealing Look at the Arts of Persuasion, vol.12 2014 http://harlotofthearts.org/index.php/harlot/article/view/237/156.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Livingston Violet. “Excerpts from Terms of Play: Poetics on Consent as Method.” Peitho: Journal of the Coalition of Feminist Scholars in the History of Rhetoric & Composition, vol.23, no. 1 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lloyd Keith. “Feminist Challenges to ‘Academic Writing’ Write Large: Changing the Argumentative Metaphor from War to Perception to Address the Problem of Argument Culture.” Intertext, vol.18, no. 1 2014 , pp.29–6.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lozano-Reich Nina M. Cloud Dana L.. “The Uncivil Tongue: Invitational Rhetoric and the Problem of Inequality.” Western Journal of Communication, vol.73, no. 2 2009 , pp.220–26.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lunsford Andrea A. Rosenblatt Adam. “’Down a Road and into an Awful Silence’: Graphic Listening in Joe Sacco’s Comics Journalism.”, Silence and Listening as Rhetorical Arts edited by Glenn Cheryl Ratcliffe Krista. Southern Illinois UP2011 , pp.130–46.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lunsford Andrea A. Ruszkiewicz John. J.. Everything’s an Argument 8th ed., Bedford/St. Martin’s2020.
    [Google Scholar]
38. MacKinnon Catharine A.. “Rape Redefined.” Harvard Law and Policy Review, vol.10, no. 43 2016 , pp.1–77.
    [Google Scholar]
39. MacKinnon Catharine A.. “Sexuality, Pornography, and Method: ‘Pleasure under Patriarchy.” Ethics, vol.99, no. 2 1989 , pp.314–46.
    [Google Scholar]
40. McComisky Bruce. “Bridging the Divide: The (Puzzling) Framework and the Transition from K-12 to College Writing Instruction.” College English, vol.74, no. 6 2012 , pp.537–40.
    [Google Scholar]
41. McIntyre Lee. Post-truth MIT Press2018.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Mercieca Jennifer. “We Are All Propagandists Now.” The Conversation July 2021 https://theconversation.com/we-are-all-propagandists-now-164519.
    [Google Scholar]
43. “Queer Rhetorical Listening Cluster.” Peitho, vol.23, no. 1 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Palczewski Catherine Helen. “Special Issue: Argumentation and Feminism.” Argumentation and Advocacy, vol.32 1996 , pp.161–70.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Pigozzi Laura Maria. “Negotiating Informed Consent: Bueno Aconsejar, Mejor Remediar (It Is Good to Give Advice, but It Is Better to Solve the Problem).”, Methodologies for the Rhetoric of Health & Medicine edited by Melonçon Lisa Blake Scott J.. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group2018 , pp.195–213.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Ratcliffe Krista. Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness Southern Illinois UP2005.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Reagon Bernice Jonson. “Coalition Politics: Turning the Century”, Homegirls: A Black Feminist Anthology Smith Barbara ed New York Kitchen Table—Women of Color Press1983 , pp.343–56.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Roberts-Miller Patricia. “On Not Bullshitting Yourself, or Your Teaching.” Composition Studies, vol.48, no. 3 2020 , pp.129–31.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Roberts-Miller Patricia. Rhetoric and Demagoguery Southern Illinois UP2019.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Royster Jacqueline Jones. “When the First Voice You Hear Is Not Your Own.” College Composition and Communication, vol.47, no. 1 Feb 1996 29.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Schibl John. Rhetorical Refusals: Defying Audiences’ Expectations Southern Illinois UP2007.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Logan Smilges J.. “Trauma Sex: A Queercrip Erotic.” Disability Studies Quarterly, vol.40, no. 3 Sep 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Toulmin Stephen. The Uses of Argument Cambridge UP1969.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Trebiloct Joyce. “Dyke Methods or Principles for the Discorvery/Creation of the Withstanding.” Hypatia, vol.3, no. 2 1988 , pp.1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Trebiloct Joyce. “More Dyke Methods.” Hypatia, vol.5, no. 1 1990 , pp.140–44.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Vass Holly. “Lexical Verb Hedging in Legal Discourse: The Case of Law Journal Articles and Supreme Court Majority and Dissenting Opinions.” English for Specific Purposes, vol.48 Oct 2017 , pp.17–31.
    [Google Scholar]