Networked Reading: How Digital Reading Experts Use Their Tools

References

1. Bazerman Charles Shaping Written Knowledge: The Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. UP of Wisconsin1985.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Carillo Ellen C. “Creating Mindful Readers in First-Year Composition Courses: A Strategy to Facilitate Transfer.” Pedagogy , vol.16no. 12016, , pp.9–22.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carillo Ellen C. “Navigating This Perfect Storm: Teaching Critical Reading in the Face of the Common Core State Standards, Fake News, and Google.” Pedagogy , vol.19no. 12019, , pp.135–59.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Craig Jacob W. “Navigating a Varied Landscape: Literacy and the Credibility of Networked Information.” Literacy in Composition Studies , vol.5no. 22017, , pp.24–42.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Haas Christina Flower Linda “Rhetorical Reading Strategies and the Construction of Meaning.” College Composition and Communication , vol.39no. 21988, , pp.167–83.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Horning Alice “It’s NOT New; it’s NOT Different: The Psycholinguistics of Digital Literacy.” Reading Matrix , vol.14no. 12014, , pp.1–15.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Horning Alice “Where to Put the Manicules: A Theory of Expert Reading.” Across the Disciplines , vol.8no. 22011, , pp.8–33.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Keller Daniel Chasing Literacy: Reading and Writing in an Age of Acceleration. U. P. of Colorado2013.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kohnen Angela M. Mertens Gillian E.. “‘I’m Always Kind of Double-Checking’: Exploring the Information-Seeking Identities of Expert Generalists.” Reading Research Quarterly , vol.54no. 32019, , pp.279–97.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Jamieson Sandra “Reading and Engaging Sources: What Students’ Use of Sources Reveals About Advanced Reading Skills.” Across The Disciplines , vol.10no. 42013, , pp.1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Locklear Amy “Redesigning the Research Arc of First-Year Composition: Renegotiating and Remapping an Approach to Information Literacy.” Journal of Teaching Writing , vol.31no. 12016, , pp.61–96.
    [Google Scholar]
12. McGrew Sarah et al.“Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning.” Theory & Research in Social Education , vol.46no. 22018, , pp.165–93.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Miller Richard E. “On Digital Reading.” Pedagogy , vol.16no. 12016, , pp.153–64.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Miller Thomas Leon Adele “Introduction to Special Issue on Literacy, Democracy, and Fake News: Making It Right in the Era of Fast and Slow Literacies.” Literacy in Composition Studies , vol.5no. 22017, , pp.10–23.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Morris Janine “A Genre-Based Approach to Digital Reading.” Pedagogy , vol.16no. 12016, , pp.125–36.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Overstreet Matthew “Writing at the Interface: A Research and Teaching Program for Everyday Digital Media Literacy.” Literacy in Composition Studies , vol.8no. 12020, , pp.47–66.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Purdy James P. Walker Joyce R. “Liminal Spaces and Research Identity: The Construction of Introductory Composition Students as Researchers.” Pedagogy , vol.13no. 12013, , pp.9–41.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Rodrigue Tanya K. “The Digital Reader, the Alphabetic Writer, and the Space Between: A Study in Digital Reading and Source-based Writing.” Computers and Composition , vol.462017, , pp.4–20.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Rodrigue Tanya K. “Digital Reading: Genre Awareness as a Tool for Reading Comprehension.” Pedagogy , vol.17no. 22017, , pp.235–57.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Salvatori Mariolina Rizzi Donahue Patricia “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Guest Editing as a Form of Disciplinary Probing.” Pedagogy , vol.16no. 12016, , pp.1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Singer Sarah A. “Embracing Wildcard Sources: Information Literacy in the Age of Internet Health.” College English , vol.82no. 22019, , pp.152–72.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Wineburg Sam McGrew Sarah “Lateral Reading: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information.” Stanford History Education Group2017.
    [Google Scholar]