Skip to content
2018
Volume 83, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0010-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8178
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce202131194
2021-03-01
2024-02-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adler-Kassner Linda. et al. “Assembling Knowledge: The Role of Threshold Concepts in Facilitating Transfer.” Anson and Moore , pp.17–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anson Chris. “The Pop Warner Chronicles: A Case Study in Contextual Adaptation and the Transfer of Writing Ability.” College Composition and Communication, vol.67, no. 4 2016 , pp.518–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anson Chris Moore Jessie L. editors Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transfer. The WAC Clearinghouse/UP of Colorado2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baird Neil Dilger Bradley. “Metaphors for Writing Transfer in the Writing Lives and Teaching Practices of Faculty in the Disciplines.” Writing Program Administration, vol.41, no. 1 2017 , pp.102–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baird Neil Dilger Bradley. “Writing Transfer and the First-Generation Transfer Student.”, Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transfer Conference 26 June 2013 Elon University, Elon, NC
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakhtin Mikhail M. “The Problem of Speech Genres.”, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays edited byEmerson Caryl Holquist Michael. U of Texas P , pp.60–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Banks Adam. “2015 CCCC Chair’s Address: Ain’t No Walls behind the Sky, Baby! Funk, Flight, Freedom.” College Composition and Communication, vol.67, no. 2 2015 , pp.267–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Banks Adam J. Digital Griots: African American Rhetoric in a Multimedia Age. Southern Illinois UP2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnett Scot Boyle Casey editorsRhetoric, Through Everyday Things. U of Alabama P2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Barnett Scot Boyle Caseyeditors “Introduction: Rhetorical Ontology, or How to Do Things with Things.” Barnett and Boyle , pp.1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bawarshi Anis. Genre and the Invention of the Writer. Utah State UP2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Beach King. “Consequential Transitions: A Developmental View of Knowledge Propagation Through Social Organizations.” Tuomi-Gröhn and Engeström , pp.39–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Beaufort Anne. College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing Instruction. Utah State UP2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Blythe Stuart. “Attending to the Subject in Writing Transfer and Adaptation.” Anson and Moore , pp.49–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Boyle Casey. “Casey Boyle Responds.” College English, vol.80, no. 1 2017 , pp.89–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Boyle Casey. Rhetoric as Posthuman Practice The Ohio State UP2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Boyle Casey. “Writing and Rhetoric and/as Posthuman Practice.” College English, vol.78, no. 6 2016 , pp.532–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Boyle Casey. “Posthumanism as Postscript.”, The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric edited byAlexander Jonathan Rhodes Jacqueline. Routledge2018 , pp.189–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Davis Rebecca Frost. “Pedagogy and Learning in a Digital Ecosystem.” Moore and Bass , pp.27–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. DePalma Michael-John Ringer Jeffrey M.. “Toward a Theory of Adaptive Transfer: Expanding Disciplinary Discussions of ‘Transfer’ in Second-Language Writing and Composition Studies.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol.20, no. 2 June 2011 , pp.134–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dobrin Sidney. Postcomposition Southern Illinois UP2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Downs Doug Wardle Elizabeth. “Teaching about Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning ‘First-Year Composition’ as ‘Introduction to Writing Studies.’” College Composition and Communication, vol.58, no. 4 2007 , pp.552–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. “The Elon Statement on Writing Transfer.” Anson and Moore , pp.345–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Engeström Yrjö. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research 2nd ed., Cambridge UP2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fishman Jennifer Jo Reiff Mary. “Taking the High Road: Teaching for Transfer in an FYC Program.” Composition Forum, vol.18 Summer 2008 compositionforum.com/issue/18/tennessee.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gee James Paul. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses 3rd ed., Routledge2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gries Laurie. Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics Utah State UP2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Grose Robert F Birney Robert C.. Transfer of Learning: An Enduring Problem in Psychology. Van Nostrand1963.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Haas Christina. Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy. Lawrence Erlbaum1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hawk Byron. “Reassembling Postprocess: Toward a Posthuman Theory of Public Rhetoric.”, Beyond Postprocess edited byDobrin Sidney I. Rice J.A. Vastola Michael. Utah State UP2011 , pp.75–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hayles N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. U of Chicago P1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. LeCourt Donna. Identity Matters: Schooling the Student Body in Academic Discourse. SUNY P2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mara Andrew Hawk Byron. “Posthuman Rhetorics and Technical Communication.” JAC, vol.19, no. 1 2009 , pp.1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Micciche Laura R. “Writing Material.” College English, vol.76, no. 6 July 2014 , pp.488–505.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Moore Jessie L. “Five Essential Principles About Writing Transfer.” Moore and Bass , pp.1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Moore Jessie L. “Mapping the Questions: The State of Writing-Related Transfer Research.” Composition Forum, vol.26 Fall 2012 compositionforum.org/issue/26/map-questions-transfer-research.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Moore Jessie L Bass Randall. eds., Understanding Writing Transfer: Implications for Transformative Learning in Higher Education. Stylus2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Muckelbauer John Hawhee Debra. “It’s the Future, Pikul.” JAC, vol.20, no. 4 2000 , pp.767–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nayar Pramod K.. Posthumanism Polity P2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nowacek Rebecca S.. et al. “‘Transfer Talk’ in Talk about Writing in Progress: Two Propositions about Transfer of Learning.” Composition Forum, vol.42 Fall 2019 compositionforum.com/issue/42/transfer-talk.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Overstreet Matthew. “A Comment on Casey Boyle’s ‘Writing and Rhetoric and/as Posthuman Practice.’” College English, vol.80, no. 1 2017 , pp.86–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Petraglia Joseph editorReconceiving Writing, Rethinking Writing Instruction. Routledge1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pigg Stacey. “Emplacing Mobile Composing Habits: A Study of Academic Writing in Networked Social Spaces.” College Composition and Communication, vol.66, no. 2 2014 , pp.250–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Piña Manuel. “Who Cares if Johnny Writes with a Pencil? Or, a Hauntological Historiography of Materiality in Composition-Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review, vol.39, no. 2 2020 , pp.188–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rhodes Jacqueline Alexander Jonathan. “Reimagining the Social Turn: New Work from the Field.” College English, vol.76, no. 6 July 2014 , pp.481–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rickert Thomas. Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. U of Pittsburgh P2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Roozen Kevin.. “Writing Is a Social and Rhetorical Activity.”, Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies edited byAdler-Kassner Linda Wardle Elizabeth. Utah State UP2014 , pp.17–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rosinski Paula. “Students’ Perceptions of the Transfer of Rhetorical Knowledge Between Digital Self-Sponsored Writing and Academic Writing: The Importance of Authentic Contexts and Reflection.” Anson and Moore , pp.247–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rule Hannah J.. Situating Writing Processes., Perspectives on Writing. The WAC Clearinghouse/UP of Colorado2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Russell David. “Activity Theory and its Implications for Writing Instruction.”, Reconceiving Writing, Rethinking Writing Instruction edited by Petraglia Joseph. 1995 Routledge2009 , pp.51–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Rutherford Kevin Palmeri Jason. “The Things They Left Behind: Toward an Object-Oriented History of Composition.” Barnett and Boyle , pp.96–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sánchez Raúl. The Function of Theory in Composition Studies. SUNY P2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Shepherd Ryan P.. “Digital Writing, Multimodality, and Learning Transfer: Crafting Connections between Composition and Online Composing.” Computers and Composition, vol.48 2018 , pp.103–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Slomp David H.. “Challenges in Assessing the Development of Writing Ability: Theories, Constructs and Methods.” Assessing Writing, vol.17 2012 , pp.81–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Stinnett Jerry. “Using Objective-Motivated Knowledge Activation to Support Writing Transfer in FYC.” College Composition and Communication, vol.70, no. 3 Feb 2019 , pp.356–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Syverson Margaret. The Wealth of Reality: An Ecology of Composition. Southern Illinois UP1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Teich Nathaniel. “Transfer of Writing Skills: Implications of the Theory of Lateral and Vertical Transfer.” Written Communication, vol.4, no. 2 1987 , pp.193–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Thorndike Edward L. Woodworth Robert S.. “The Influence of Improvement in One Mental Function upon the Efficiency of Other Functions. (I).” Psychological Review, vol.8, no. 3 1901 , pp.247–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Tuomi-Gröhn Terrtu Engeström Yrjö editorsBetween School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary-Crossing. Pergamon2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Tuomi-Gröhn Terrtu Engeström Yrjö editors “Conceptualizing Transfer: From Standard Notions to Developmental Perspectives.” Tuomi-Gröhn and Engeström, , pp.19–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Vint Sherryl. Bodies of Tomorrow: Technology, Subjectivity, Science Fiction. U of Toronto P2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Wardle Elizabeth. “Understanding ‘Transfer’ from FYC: Preliminary Results of a Longitudinal Study.” Writing Program Administration, vol.31, no. 1 2 Fall/Winter 2007 , pp.65–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Wolfe Cary. What is Posthumanism? U of Minnesota P2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Yancey Kathleen Blake. “Mapping the Prior: A Beginning Typology and its Impact on Writing.”, Contemporary Perspectives on Cognition and Writing edited byPortanova Patricia Rifenburg J. Michael Roen Duane. UP of Colorado2017 , pp.313–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Yancey Kathleen Blake. et al. Writing across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing. Utah State UP2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Yancey Kathleen Blake. et al. “The Teaching for Transfer Curriculum: The Role of Concurrent Transfer and Inside- and Outside-School Contexts in Supporting Students’ Writing Development.” College Composition and Communication, vol.71, no. 2 Dec 2019 , pp.268–95.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ce202131194
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error