Skip to content
2018
Volume 83, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0010-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8178
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce202131094
2021-01-01
2025-02-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexander Kara Poe. “Composing Arguments of Scholarly Worth: A Case Study of the Portfolio Letter.” Rhetoric Review, vol.35, no. 3 2016 , pp.25–267.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson Daniel. et al. “Integrating Multimodality into Composition Curricula: Survey Methodology and Results from a CCCC Research Grant.” Composition Studies, vol.34, no. 2 2006 , pp.59–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. American Association of University Professors. “1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure,” AAUP.org aaup.org/report/1940-statement-principles-academic-freedom-and-tenure Accessed 17 Sept 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ballif Michelle D.. et al. Women’s Ways of Making it in Rhetoric and Composition. Routledge2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck Julie. “The Concept Creep of ‘Emotional Labor.’“ The Atlantic 26 Nov 2018, theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/11/arlie-hochschild-housework-isnt-emotional-labor/576637 Accessed 8 Sept. 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Russell Bernard H.. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches 6th ed., Rowman and Littlefield2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boyer Ernest. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching1990.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Braun Virginia Clarke Victoria. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol.3, no. 2 2016 , pp.77–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carillo Ellen. Securing a Place for Reading in Composition Studies: The Importance of Teaching for Transfer. Utah State UP2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Caswell Nicole I.. et al. The Working Lives of New Writing Center Directors Kindle Ed Utah State UP2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Council of Writing Program Administrators “Evaluating the Intellectual Work of Writing Administration.” WPA Council 2019, wpacouncil.org/aws/CWPA/pt/sd/news_article/242849/_PAR ENT/layout_details/false Accessed 13 Sept. 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eble Michelle. et al. “Valuing Editorial Collaborations as Scholarship: A Survey of Tenure and Promotion Documents.” College English, vol.81, no. 4 2019 , pp.339–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Finkelstein Martin. et al. “Taking the Measure of Faculty Diversity.” TIAA Institute 2016, www.tiaainstitute.org/publication/taking-measure-faculty-diversity Accessed 12 Sept. 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gebhardt Richard. “Evolving Approaches to Scholarship, Promotion, and Tenure in Composition Studies.” Academic Advancement in Composition Studies: Scholarship, Publication, Promotion, Tenure edited by Gebhardt Richard Smith Gebhardt Barbara Genelle Routledge2013 , pp.1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodburn Amy. et al. editors Rewriting Success in Rhetoric and Composition Careers. Parlor2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Carol Greene H.. et al. “Building a Support System Toward Tenure: Challenges and Needs of Tenure-Track Faculty in Colleges of Education.” Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol.16, no. 4 2008 , pp.429–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hirschkorn Mark. “How Vulnerable Am I? An Experiential Discussion of Tenure Rhetoric for New Faculty.” The Journal of Educational Thought (JET) / Revue De La Pensée Éducative, vol.44, no. 1 2010 , pp.41–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacobs Jerry A. Winslow Sarah E.. “Overworked Faculty: Job Stresses and Family Demands.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol.596, no. 1 Nov 2004 , pp.104–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lackritz James. “Exploring Burnout Among University Faculty: Incidence, Performance, and Demographic Issues.” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol.20, no. 7 2004 , pp.713–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Langdon Lance. et al. editors Emotion Spec. issue of Composition Forum, vol.34 composition forum.com/issue/34/.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Leverenz Carrie. “Tenure and Promotion in Rhetoric and Composition.” College Composition and Communication, vol.52, no. 1 2000 , pp.143–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Maid Barry. “Yes, a Technorhetorician Can Get Tenure.” Computers and Composition, vol.17, no. 1 2000 , pp.9–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Matthew Patricia A.. Written/Unwritten: Diversity and the Hidden Truths of Tenure Kindle ed U of North Carolina P2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Olsen Deborah. “Work Satisfaction and Stress in the First and Third Year of Academic Appointment.” The Journal of Higher Education, vol.64, no. 4 1993 , pp.453–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Plaut Victoria C.. et al. “Officially Advocated, but Institutionally Undermined: Diversity Rhetoric and Subjective Realities of Junior Faculty of Color.” The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities, and Nations, vol.11, no. 2 2011 , pp.101–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Robinson Rebecca .S.. “Purposive Sampling.” Michalos A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Dordrecht 2014 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑0753‑5_2337.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sano-Franchini Jennifer. “‘It’s Like Writing Yourself into a Codependent Relationship with Someone who Doesn’t Even Want You!’ Emotional Labor, Intimacy, and the Academic Job Market in Rhetoric and Composition.” College Composition and Communication, vol.68, no. 1 2016 , pp.98–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. University of Central Florida Department of Writing and Rhetoric “Promotion and Tenure Guidelines.” University of Central Florida Faculty Excellence 21 Nov 2014, facultyexcellence.ucf.edu/document/writing-and-rhetoric-t-te-criteria/ Accessed 18 Dec. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wasburn-Moses Leah.“We Make Tenure Decisions Unfairly. Here’s a Better Way.” The Chronicle of Higher Education 27 Mar 2018 chronicle.com/article/we-make-tenure-decisions-unfairlyheres-a-better-way/ Accessed 18 Feb. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ce202131094
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ce202131094
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error