Skip to content
2018
Volume 83, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0010-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8178
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce202030929
2020-09-01
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. “About.” KairosCamp www.kairos.camp/about/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. “Author Workshop Archive.” KairosCamp www.kairos.camp/author-workshops/author-workshop-archive/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. “SCHEDULE (2018).” Digital Media and Composition Institute, 2018 www.dmacinstitute.com/ schedule-2018/.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmed Sara The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Routledge2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmed Sara “Happy Objects.” The Affect Theory Reader edited by Gregg Melissa Sei-gworth Gregory J. Duke UP2010, , pp.29–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Alex Personal interview23Feb2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Alexander Kara Poe Williams Danielle M. “DMAC after dark: Toward a theory of distributed invention.” Computers and Composition , vol.362015, , pp.32–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Alvarez Sara et al.“On Multimodal Composing - Analysis.” Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy , vol.21, no. no. 22017, kairos.technorhetoric.net/21.2/praxis/devoss-et-al/ analysis.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ball Cheryl E. Eyman Douglas “Editorial Workflows for Multimedia-Rich Scholarship.” Journal of Electronic Publishing , vol.18, no. no. 42015 10.3998/3336451.0018.406
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ball Cheryl E. Sheppard Jennifer Arola Kristin L. Writer/Designer: A Guide to Making Multimodal Projects 2nd ed., Macmillan Higher Education2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Berry Patrick W. Hawisher Gail E. Selfe Cynthia L. eds Provocations: Reconstructing the Archive, featuring the work of Erin R. Anderson, Trisha N. Campbell, Alexandra Hidalgo, and Jody Shipka. Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State UP2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Beveridge Aaron “Looking in the Dustbin: Data Janitorial Work, Statistical Reasoning, and Information Rhetorics - Methods.” Computers and Composition Online2015, cconlinejournal.org/fall15/beveridge/methods.html. Accessed 10 Jan. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Blewett Kelly et al.“Editing as Inclusion Activism.” Scholarly Editing: History, Performance, Future special issue of College English , vol.81, no. no. 4March2019, , pp.273–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bray Nancy “Writing with Scrivener: A Hopeful Tale of Disappearing Tools, Flatulence, and Word Processing Redemption.” Computers and Composition , vol.30, no. no. 32013, , pp.197–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brooke Collin Carr Allison “Failure can be an Important Part of Writing Development.” Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies edited by Adler-Kassner Linda Wardle Elizabeth Utah State UP2015, , pp.62–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brooke Personal interview5Feb2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Campbell Trisha N. “Digital Empathy: A Practice-based Experiment.” Enculturation. no. 242017, enculturation.net/digital_empathy.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Davis Carleigh “Sweetland/ UM Press Book Prize Awarded to Tim Lockridge and Derek Van Ittersum.” Gayle Morris Sweetland Digital Rhetoric Collaborative26July2018, www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org/2018/07/26/sweetland-um-press-book-prize-awarded-to-tim-lockridge-and-derek-van-ittersum/. Accessed 12 Nov. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Delagrange Susan H. Technologies of Wonder: Rhetorical Practice in a Digital World. Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State UP2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Edwards Dustin “On Circulatory Encounters: The Case for Tactical Rhetorics.” Enculturation: A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing, and Culture. no. 252017, enculturation.net/circulatory_encounters.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Emily Personal interview15Mar2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Eyman Douglas Ball Cheryl E. “Composing for Digital Publication: Rhetoric, Design, Code.” Composition Studies , vol.42, no. no. 12014, , pp.114–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Grace Eric Personal interview7June2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Helen Personal interview13Mar2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Helms Jason Rhizcomics: Rhetoric, Technology, and New Media Composition. University of Michigan P2017 10.3998/mpub.7626373
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Henry Personal interview22Feb2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hidalgo Alexandra Cámara Retórica: A Feminist Filmmaking Methodology. Computers and Composition Digital Press and Utah State UP2017, ccdigitalpress.org/camara.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hochschild Arlie Russell The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. U of California P2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ian Nick Personal interview15May2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ianetta Melissa “From the Editor.” Scholarly Editing: History, Performance, Future special issue of College English , vol.81, no. no. 4Mar2019, , pp.267–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kris Personal interview17Feb2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kurtyka Faith M. “Learning How to Feel: Conversion Narratives and Community Membership in First-Year Composition.” Composition Studies , vol.45, no. no. 12017, , pp.99–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. kyburz bonnie lenore Cruel Auteurism: Affective Digital Mediations toward Film-Composition. The WAC Clearinghouse; UP of Colorado2019, wac.colostate.edu/books/writing/cruel/.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Laflen Angela Fiorenza Brittany. “‘Okay, My Rant is Over’: The Language of Emotion in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Computers and Composition, vol.29, no. 4 2012 296308
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lane. Personal interview 6 Apr 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Martin. Personal interview 10 Mar 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mason Jean. “Hyperwriting: A New Process Model.” The Writing Instructor no. 1 2001 www.writinginstructor.org/mason-2001-09 Accessed 21 Aug. 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. McNely Brian. “Instagram, Geocaching, and the When of Rhetorical Literacies.” Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, vol.19, no. 3 2015 kairos.technorhetoric.net/19.3/topoi/mcnely/ Accessed 10 Jan. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Micciche Laura R..Acknowledging Writing Partners The WAC Clearinghouse and UP of Colorado2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Morey Sean.Rhetorical Delivery and Digital Technologies: Networks, Affect, Electracy Routledge2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Murray Joddy.Non-Discursive Rhetoric: Image and Affect in Multimodal Composition SUNY Press2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ostergaard Lori Nugent Jim. “‘Other Stories to Tell’: Scholarly Journal Editors as Archivists.” Scholarly Editing: History, Performance, Future, special issue of College English, vol.81, no. 4 March 2019 , pp.297–313.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Prior Paul Shipka Jody. “Chronotopic Lamination: Tracing the Contours of Literate Activity.”, Writing Selves/Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives edited by Bazerman Charles Russell David R. 2003 180236
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rhodes Jacqueline Alexander Jonathan.Techne: Queer Meditations on Writing the Self Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press2015 ccdigitalpress.org/ book/techne/.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Ridolfo Jim. “Rhetorical Delivery as Strategy: Rebuilding the Fifth Canon from Practitioner Stories.” Rhetoric Review, vol.31, no. 2 2012 11729
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rule Hannah J. “Writing’s Rooms.” College Composition and Communication, vol.69, no. 3 2018 40232
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ryan. Personal interview 14 Feb 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Scanlon Molly J. “The Work of Comics Collaborations: Considerations of Multimodal Composition for Writing Scholarship and Pedagogy.” Composition Studies, vol.43, no. 1 2015 10530
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Selfe Cindy Hawisher Gail. “Exceeding the Bounds of the Interview: Feminism, Mediation, Narrative, and Conversations about Digital Literacy.” In Writing Studies Research in Practice edited by Nickoson Lee Sheridan Mary P.. Southern Illinois UP2012 3650
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sheppard Jennifer. “The Rhetorical Work of Multimedia Production Practices: It’s More Than Just Technical Skill.” Computers and Composition, vol.26, no. 2 2009 12231
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sheridan David Michael Ridolfo Jim Michel Anthony J..The Available Means of Persuasion: Mapping a Theory and Pedagogy of Multimodal Public Rhetoric Parlor Press2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Shipka Jody. “Transmodality in/and Processes of Making: Changing Dispositions and Practice.” College English, vol.78, no. 3 Jan 2016 25057
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Shipka Jody.Toward a Composition Made Whole U of Pittsburgh P2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Lyle Skains R.. “The Adaptive Process of Multimodal Composition: How Developing Tacit Knowledge of Digital Tools Affects Creative Writing.” Computers and Composition, vol.432017 10617
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sorapure Madeleine Stolley Karl. “Introducing Inventio.” Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, vol.12, no. 1 2007 kairos.technorhetoric.net/12.1/binder.html?inventio/index.htm Accessed 10 Jan. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Stewart Kathleen.Ordinary Affects Duke University Press2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. VanKooten Crystal. “Singer, Writer: A Choric Exploration of Sound and Writing.” Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, vol.21, no. 1 2016 kairos.technorhetoric.net/21.1/inventio/vankooten/index.html Accessed 12 Nov. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ce202030929
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ce202030929
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error