f Introduction: Transdisciplinary Intra-actions

References

1. Adler-Kassner Linda Wardle Elizabeth. Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies. Utah State UP2015.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Agboka Godwin Y.. “Participatory Localization: A Social Justice Approach to Navigating Unen-franchised/disenfranchised Cultural Sites.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol.22, no. 1 2013 , pp.28–49.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allen Jo. “Bridge Over Troubled Waters? Connecting Research and Pedagogy in Composition and Business/Technical Communication.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol.1, no. 4 1992 , pp.5–26.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bay Jennifer. “Writing Beyond Borders: Rethinking the Relationship between Composition Studies and Professional Writing.” Composition Studies, vol.38, no. 2 2010 , pp.29–45.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bay Jennifer. “Response: All We Need Is Love.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.545–50.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barad Karen. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol.28, no. 3 2003 , pp.801–31.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barad Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning Duke University Press2007.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cardinal Alison. “Participatory Video: An Apparatus for Ethically Researching Literacy, Power, and Embodiment.” Computers and Composition, vol.53 2019 , pp.34–46.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cobos Casie Raquel Ríos Gabriela Johnson Sackey Donnie Sano-Franchini Jennifer Haas Angela M.. “Interfacing Cultural Rhetorics: A History and a Call.” Rhetoric Review, vol.37, no. 2 2018 , pp.139–54.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Corder Jim W.. “Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love.” Rhetoric Review, vol.4, no. 1 1985 , pp.16–32.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dölling Irene Hark Sabine. “She Who Speaks Shadow Speaks Truth: Transdisciplinarity in Women’s and Gender Studies.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol.25, no. 4 Summer 2000 , pp.1195–98.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eble Michelle F.. “Transdisciplinary Mentoring Networks to Develop and Sustain Inclusion in Graduate Programs.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.527–35.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Enríquez-Loya Aydé Léon Kendall. “Transdisciplinary Rhetorical Work in Technical Writing and Composition: Environmental Justice Issues in California.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.449–59.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gonzales Laura. “Building Transdisciplinary Connections between Composition Studies and Technical Communication to Understand Multilingual Writing Processes.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.460–71.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Grabill Jeffrey. “There Are No Disciplines Here: The Causes of Who We Are and What We Do.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.484–91.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haas Angela. “Toward a Decolonial Digital and Visual American Indian Rhetorics Pedagogy.” Survivance, Sovereignty, and Story: Teaching American Indian Rhetorics edited by Lisa Rose Gubele Rain Anderson Joyce. Utah State UP2015 , pp.188–208.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Haas Angela Michelle Eble eds Key Theoretical Frameworks: Teaching Technical Communication in the Twenty-First Century Utah State UP2018.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hawhee Debra. Moving Bodies: Kenneth Burke at the Edges of Language U of South Carolina P2009.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jones Natasha N.. “Coalitional Learning in the Contact Zones: Inclusion and Narrative Inquiry in Technical Communication and Composition Studies.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.515–26.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Malenczyk Rita Miller-Cochran Susan Wardle Elizabeth Yancey Kathleen eds Composition, Rhetoric, and Disciplinarity Utah State University Press2018.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Miller Carolyn R.. “A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing.” College English, vol.40, no. 6 1979 , pp.610–17.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Miller Carolyn R.. “Revisiting ‘A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing.’” College English, vol.40, no. 6 2020 , pp.443–8.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pigg Stacey Berger Arthur. “Still ‘Worlds Apart’? Early-Career Writing Learning as a Transdisciplinary Opportunity.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.507–14.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pratt Mary L.. “Arts of The Contact Zone.” Profession 1991 , pp.33–40.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Russell David R.. “Retreading, Non-ing, and a TPC Rationale for Sub-disciplining in Writing Studies.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.472–83.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Scott J. Blake Laurie A. Pinkert.. “Integrative Techne, Transdisciplinary Learning, and Writing Program Design.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.492–506.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Stark Whitney. “Intra-action.” New Materialism: How Matter Comes to Matter newmaterialism.eu/almanac/i/intra-action.html Accessed 19 Nov 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Sun Huatong. Cross-Cultural Technology Design: Creating Culture-Sensitive Technology for Local Users Oxford UP 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
29. West-Puckett Stephanie.. Materializing Makerspaces: Queerly Composing Space, Time, and (What) Matters 2017 Eastern Carolina University, PhD dissertation
    [Google Scholar]
30. Zdenek Sean. “Transforming Access and Inclusion in Composition Studies and Technical Communication.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.536–44.
    [Google Scholar]