Response: All We Need Is Love

References

1. Bay Jennifer. “Writing Beyond Borders: Rethinking the Relationship between Composition Studies and Professional Writing.” Composition Studies, vol.38, no. 2 2010 , pp.29–46.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cobos Casie Raquel Ríos Gabriela Johnson Sackey Donnie Sano-Franchini Jennifer Haas Angela M.. “Interfacing Cultural Rhetorics: A History and a Call.” Rhetoric Review, vol.37, no. 2 2018 , pp.139–54.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Corder Jim W.. “Argument as Emergence, Rhetoric as Love.” Rhetoric Review, vol.4, no. 1 1985 , pp.16–32.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Eble Michelle F.. “Transdisciplinary Mentoring Networks to Develop and Sustain Inclusion in Graduate Programs.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.527–35.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Enríquez-Loya Aydé Léon Kendall. “Transdisciplinary Rhetorical Work in Technical Writing and Composition: Environmental Justice Issues in California.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.449–59.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gonzales Laura. “Building Transdisciplinary Connections between Composition Studies and Technical Communication to Understand Multilingual Writing Processes.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.460–71.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gonzales Laura Shivers-McNair Ann Bawarshi Anis. “Transdisciplinary Intra-actions.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.432–42.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Grabill Jeffrey. “There Are No Disciplines Here: The Causes of Who We Are and What We Do.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.484–91.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ingold Tim. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description Routledge2011.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Jones Natasha N.. “Coalitional Learning in the Contact Zones: Inclusion and Narrative Inquiry in Technical Communication and Composition Studies.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.515–26.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kennedy George A.. “A Hoot in the Dark: The Evolution of General Rhetoric.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol.25, no. 1 1992 , pp.1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lauer Janice M.. “Composition Studies: Dappled Discipline.” Rhetoric Review, vol.3, no. 1 1994 , pp.20–29.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Mailloux Steve. Reception Histories: Rhetoric, Pragmatism, and American Cultural Politics Cornell UP1998.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Pigg Stacey Berger Arthur. “Still ‘Worlds Apart’? Early-Career Writing Learning as a Transdisciplinary Opportunity.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.507–14.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Powell Malea. “2012 CCCC Chair’s Address: Stories Take Place: A Performance in One Act.” College Composition and Communication, vol.64, no. 2 2012 , pp.383–406.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Royster Jacqueline Jones Kirsch Gesa E.. Feminist Rhetorical Practices: New Horizons for Rhetoric, Composition, and Literacy Studies Southern Illinois UP2012.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Russell David R.. “Retreading, Non-ing, and a TPC Rationale for Sub-disciplining in Writing Studies.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.472–83.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Blake Scott J. Pinkert Laurie A.. “Integrative Techne, Transdisciplinary Learning, and Writing Program Design.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.492–506.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Zdenek Sean. “Transforming Access and Inclusion in Composition Studies and Technical Communication.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.536–44.
    [Google Scholar]