Metaphor 2: Crossing: Integrative Techne, Transdisciplinary Learning, and Writing Program Design

References

1. Alexander Jonathan Lunsford Karen Whithaus Carl. “Toward Wayfinding: A Metaphor for Understanding Writing Experiences.” Written Communication, vol.37, no. 1 2020 , pp.104–31.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Association of American Colleges and Universities Integrative and Applied Learning VALUE Rubric.Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/integrative-learning.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Atwill Janet M.. Rhetoric Reclaimed: Aristotle and the Liberal Arts Tradition Cornell UP1998.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ferren Ann S., and Paris David C.. Faculty Leadership for Integrative Liberal Learning Association of American Colleges and Universities2015.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Flower Linda. Community Literacy and the Rhetoric of Public Engagement Southern Illinois UP2008.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gallaher Chris W.. “The Trouble with Outcomes: Pragmatic Inquiry and Educational Aims.” College English, vol.75, no. 1 Sept 2012 , pp.42–60.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Grabill Jeffrey. “There Are No Disciplines Here: The Case of Who We Are and What We Do.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.484–91.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Huber Mary Taylor Hutchings Pat. Integrative Learning: Mapping the Terrain (report) AAC&U and Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Learning2004.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Johnson Robert R.. “Craft Knowledge: Of Disciplinarity in Writing Studies.” College Composition and Communication, vol.61, no. 4 June 2010 , pp.673–90.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Moeller Ryan McAllister Ken. “Playing with Techne: A Propaedeutic for Technical Communication.”, Technical Communication Quarterly, vol.11, no. 2 Spring2002 , pp.185–206.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Peeples Tim Hart-Davidson Bill. “Remapping Professional Writing: Articulating the State of the Art and Composition Studies.”, Exploring Composition Studies: Sites, Issues, Perspectives edited by Ritter Kelly Kei Matsuda Paul. Utah State UP , pp.52–72.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Pigg Stacy Berger Arthur. “Still “Worlds Apart’? Early Career Writing Learning as Trans- disciplinary Opportunity.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.507–14.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Pinkert Laurie. A., and Moore Kristen R.. “Programmatic Mapping as a Problem-Solving Tool for WPAs.”.(In review).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ratcliffe Krista. Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness Southern Illinois UP2005.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Russell David. “The View from Eight Miles High or Eighty: Writing in the Academy and Beyond.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.472–83.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Blake Scott J. Lisa Melonçon.. “Writing and Rhetoric Majors, Disciplinarity, and Techne.”, Composition Forum, vol.35 Spring2017.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sterne Jonathan.. “Techne.”, Communication As…: Perspectives on Theory edited by Shepherd Gregory J. John Jeffrey St. Striphas Ted. SAGE2006 , pp.91–98.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Wickman Chad. “Rhetoric, Techne, and the Art of Scientific Inquiry.” Rhetoric Review, vol.31, no. 1 Dec 2011 , pp.21–40.
    [Google Scholar]