f Metaphor 2: Crossing: There Are No Disciplines Here: The Causes of Who We Are and What We Do

References

1. Jamieson Sandra. “The Major in Composition Writing and Rhetoric: Tracking Changes in the Evolving Discipline.”, Composition, Rhetoric, and Disciplinarity edited by Malencczyk Rita Miller-Cochran Susan Wardle Elizabeth Blake Yancey Kathleen. Utah State UP2018 , pp.243–66.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Johnson Robert. “Craft Knowledge: Of Disciplinarity in Writing Studies.” College Composition and Communication, vol.61, no. 4 2010 , pp.673–90.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Malenczyk Rita Miller-Cochran Susan Wardle Elizabeth Blake Yancey Kathleen editors Composition, Rhetoric, and Disciplinarity Utah State UP2018.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Phelps Louise Wetherbee Ackerman John M.. “Making the Case for Disciplinarity in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies: The Visibility Project.” College Composition and Communication, vol.62, no. 1 2010 , pp.180–215.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Reid Gwendolynne Miller Carolyn R.. “Classification and Its Discontents: Making Peace with Blurred Boundaries, Open Categories, and Diffuse Disciplines.”, Composition, Rhetoric, and Disciplinarity edited by Malencczyk Rita Miller-Cochran Susan Wardle Elizabeth Blake Yancey Kathleen. Utah State UP2018 , pp.87–110.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Russell David. “Retreading, Non-ing, and a TPC Rationale for Sub-disciplining in Writing Studies.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.472–83.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Yancey Kathleen Blake. “Mapping the Turn to Disciplinarity: A Historical Analysis of Composition’s Trajectory and Its Current Moment.”, Composition, Rhetoric, and Disciplinarity edited by Malencczyk Rita Miller-Cochran Susan Wardle Elizabeth Blake Yancey Kathleen. Utah State UP2018 , pp.15–35.
   [Google Scholar]