Metaphor 2: Crossing: Retreading, Non-ing, and a TPC Rationale for Sub-disciplining in Writing Studies

References

1. Andersen Rebekka. “Rhetorical Work in the Age of Content Management: Implications for the Field of Technical Communication.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.28, no. 2 2014 , pp.115–57.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Angeli Elizabeth L.. “Three Types of Memory in Emergency Medical Services Communication.” Written Communication, vol.32, no. 1 2015 , pp.3–38.
   [Google Scholar]
3. AWP: About Resources, Advocacy, and Writing Opportunities Accessed 29 Mar 2019 http://awpwriter.org".
4. Bazerman Charles. et al. The Lifespan Development of Writing National Council of Teachers of English2018.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bourdieu Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste Routledge2013.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boyle Casey Andrew. Rhetoric as a Posthuman Practice The Ohio State University Press2018.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brandt Deborah. The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy Cambridge UP2014.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brent Doug. “Transfer, Transformation, and Rhetorical Knowledge: Insights from Transfer Theory.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.25, no. 4 2011 , pp.396–420.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brown James J.. “The Machine That Therefore I Am.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol.47, no. 4 2014 , pp.494–514.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brown James J.. Ethical Programs: Hospitality and the Rhetorics of Software U Michigan P2015.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cox Matthew B.. “Working Closets: Mapping Queer Professional Discourses and Why Professional Communication Studies Need Queer Rhetorics.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.33, no. 1 2019 , pp.1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hertogh De Beth Lori. “Feminist Digital Research Methodology for Rhetoricians of Health and Medicine.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.32, no. 4 2018 , pp.480–503.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dryer Dylan B. Russell David R.. “Attending to Phenomenology: Rethinking Cognition and Reflection in North American Writing Studies.”, Contemporary Perspectives on Cognition and Writing WAC Clearinghouse2018 , pp.57–76.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fisher David RussellDavid R. Williams Joseph Fisher Dan. “Space, Time, and Transfer in Virtual Case Environments (VCEs).” Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, Pedagogy, vol.12, no. 2 Jan 2008 Accessed 16 Jan. 2008 http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/12.2/binder.html?topoi/fisher-etal/articleIntro.html.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Grabill Jeff. “Infrastructure Outreach and the Engaged Writing Program.”, Going Public: What Writing Programs Learn from Engagement edited by Rose Shirley K. Weiser Irvin. Utah State UP2010 , pp.15–28.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Grabill Jeff.. “There Are No Disciplines Here: The Causes of Who We Are and What We Do.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.484–91.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hart-Davidson William. et al. “Coming to Content Management: Inventing Infrastructure for Organizational Knowledge Work.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol.17, no. 1 2007 , pp.10–34.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jakobs Eva-Maria Spinuzzi Clay. “Professional Domains: Writing as Creation of Economic Value.”, Handbook of Writing and Text Production edited by Jakobs Eva-Maria Perrin Daniel Gruyter De 2014 , pp.359–84.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Keohane Joe. “What News-Writing Bots Mean for the Future of Journalism.” Wired Magazine Mar 2017 https://www.wired.com/2017/02/robots-wrote-this-story/.
    [Google Scholar]
20. MacArthur Charles A.. et al. Handbook of Writing Research Guilford2015.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Miller Carolyn R. Shepherd Dawn. “Questions for Genre Theory from the Blogosphere.”, Genres in the Internet: Issues in the Theory of Genre edited by Giltrow Janet Stein Dieter. John Benjamins2009 , pp.263–90.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Odell Lee Goswami Dixie. Writing in Non-Academic Settings Guilford1981.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Opel Dawn S., and Hart-Davidson William. “The Primary Care Clinic as Writing Space.” Written Communication, vol.36, no. 3 2019 , pp.348–78.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Paradis James. et al. “Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the Writing Environment of an R&D Organization.”, Writing in Nonacademic Settings Guilford1981 , pp.281–307.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Petersen Emily January Walton Rebecca. “Bridging Analysis and Action: How Feminist Scholarship Can Inform the Social Justice Turn.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.32, no. 4 2018 , pp.416–46.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pigg Stacey Berger Arthur. “Still ‘Worlds Apart’? Early-Career Writing Learning as a Trans-disciplinary Opportunity.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.507–14.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Portanova Patricia. et al. Contemporary Perspectives on Cognition and Writing WAC Clearinghouse2018.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Prior Paul Smith Anna. Writing across: Tracing Transliteracies as Becoming across Time, Space, and Settings Elsevier2019.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Randazzo Chalice. “About Face: Reflexively Considering ‘Audience’ in Hiring Situations.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.33, no. 2 2019 , pp.203–32.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Read Sarah. “The Infrastructural Function: A Relational Theory of Infrastructure for Writing Studies.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.33, no. 3 2019 , pp.233–67.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Read Sarah Papka Michael E.. “Genre Cycling: The Infrastructural Function of an Operational Assessment Review and Reporting Process at a Federal Scientific Supercomputing User Facility.”, Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on The Design of Communication ACM2014 10.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Russell David R.. “The Literary and the Literate: The Study and Teaching of Writing in US English Departments.”, Futures for English Studies: Teaching Language, Literature and Creative Writing in Higher Education edited by Hewings Ann Prescott Lynda Seargeant Phillip. Springer2016 , pp.139–57.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Russell David R.. “Perception and Recognition of Textual Genres: A Phenomenological Approach.”, Proceedings of the Fourth Writing Research Across Borders Conference WAC Clearinghouse and Colorado State UP, forthcoming
    [Google Scholar]
34. Russell David R.. “‘Picking Up’ Writing: Rethinking Pedagogy in Light of Phenomenological Analyses.” Desde la Literacidad Académica II: Perspectivas, Experiencias y Retos, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala 2017 , pp.28–43.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Russell David R.. “Rethinking the Articulation Between Business and Technical Communication and Writing in the Disciplines: Useful Avenues for Teaching and Research.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.21, no. 3 2007 , pp.248–77.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Russell David R.. “The Search for Traditions.” College English, vol.50, no. 4 1988 , pp.437–43.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Russell David R.. “Writing across the Curriculum in 1913: James Fleming Hosic on ‘Co-operation.’” English Journal, vol.75, no. 5 Sept 1986 , pp.34–37.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Russell David R.. Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A Curricular History 3rd ed Southern Illinois University, forthcoming
    [Google Scholar]
39. Russell David R., and Cortes Viviana. “Academic and Scientific Texts: The Same or Different Communities?” University Writing: Selves and Texts in Academic Societies 2012 , pp.3–18.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Russell David R., and Fisher Dave. “Online, Multimedia Case Studies for Professional Education: Revisioning Concepts of Genre Recognition.”, Theories of Genre and the Internet edited by Giltrow Janet Stein Dieter. John Benjamins2010 , pp.163–91.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Russell David R. Yañez Arturo. “‘Big Picture People Rarely Become Historians’: Genre Systems and the Contradictions of General Education.”, Writing Selves/Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives edited by Bazerman Charles Russell David R.. WAC Clearinghouse2003 , pp.331–62.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Russell David R.. et al. “Exploring Notions of Genre in ‘Academic Literacies’ and ‘Writing across the Curriculum’: Approaches across Countries and Contexts.”, Genre in a Changing World edited by Charles Bazerman Adair Bonini Figueiredo Débora. The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press2009 , pp.395–423.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Schumacher Julie. Dear Committee Members Anchor Books2014.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Blake Scott J. Pinkert Laurie. “Integrative Techne, Transdisciplinary Learning, and Writing Program Design.” College English, vol.82, no. 5 2020 , pp.492–506.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Slack Jennifer Daryl. et al. “The Technical Communicator as Author: Meaning, Power, Authority.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.7, no. 1 1993 , pp.12–36.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Swarts Jason. “Recycled Writing: Assembling Actor Networks from Reusable Content.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol.24, no. 2 2010 , pp.127–63.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Wickman Chad. “Writing Material in Chemical Physics Research: The Laboratory Notebook as Locus of Technical and Textual Integration.” Written Communication, vol.27, no. 3 2010 , pp.259–92.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Wilder Laura. Rhetorical Strategies and Genre Conventions in Literary Studies: Teaching and Writing in the Disciplines Southern Illinois UP2012.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Yañez Arturo Russell David R.. “The World Is Too Messy: The Challenge of Historical Literacy in a General-Education Course.”, Composition(s) in the New Liberal Arts edited by Caster Post Joanna Inman James A.. Hampton Press2009 , pp.43–75.
    [Google Scholar]