Skip to content
2018
Volume 81, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0010-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8178
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce201930150
2019-05-01
2024-02-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barry Bruce . Speechless: The Erosion of Free Expression in the American Workplace. Berrett-Koehler 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Batova Tatiana . “Work Motivation in the Rhetoric of Component Content Management.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication , vol.32, no. 3 2018, pp.308–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Batova Tatiana Clark Dave . “The Complexities of Globalized Content Management.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication , vol.29, no. 2 2015, pp.221–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boesky Amy . “The Ghost Writes Back.” Kenyon Review Online 2013, www.kenyonreview.org/kr-online-issue/2013-winter/selections/amy-boesky-656342/ Accessed 17 May 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolter Jay David Grusin Richard . Remediation: Understanding New Media. MIT Press 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brandt Deborah. The Rise of Writing. Cambridge UP 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruss Kristine S. . “Ghosting Authenticity: Characterization in Corporate Speechwriting.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication , vol.25, no. 2 2011, pp.159–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Burke Kenneth . Language as Symbolic Action. U of California P 1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Burnham Christopher Powell Rebecca . “Expressivism: Practice/ Theory, Theory/Practice.”, A Guide to Composition Pedagogies 2nd ed edited by Hessler Brooke Rupiper-Taggart Amy Schick Kurt. Oxford UP 2014, pp.111–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Charmaz Kathy . Constructing Grounded Theory 2nd ed., SAGE 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Clayson Ashley . “Distributed Writing as a Lens for Examining Writing as Embodied Practice.” Technical Communication Quarterly , vol.27, no. 3 2018, pp.217–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Crowley Sharon . Composition in the University: Historical and Polemical Essays. U of Pittsburgh P 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Elbow Peter . “Closing My Eyes As I Speak: An Argument For Ignoring Audience.” College English , vol.49 1987, pp.50–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fishman Jenn . et al. “Performing Writing, Performing Literacy.” College Composition and Communication , vol.57, no. 2, Dec 2005, pp.224–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fisk Catherine . Working Knowledge: Employee Innovation and the Rise of Corporate Intellectual Property, 1800-1930. U of North Carolina P 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Foucault Michel . “What Is an Author?” Modernity and Its Discontents 1969, pp.299–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gee James . “Discourses and Literacies.”, Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Routeledge 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. George Sheldon . “The Performed Self in College Writing: From Personal Narratives to Analytic and Research Essays.” Pedagogy , vol.12, no. 2 2012, pp.319–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Goldblatt Eli . “Don’t Call It Expressivism: Legacies of a ‘Tacit Tradition.’” College Composition and Communication , vol.68, no. 3 2017, pp.438–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Graff Harvey . The Literacy Myth: Cultural Integration and Social Structure in the Nineteenth Century. Transaction Publishers 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Griffin Robert J. . “Anonymity and Authorship.” New Literary History , vol.30, no. 4 1999877 -95
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Haas Christina . Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy. Routledge 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hairston Maxine . “The Winds of Change: Thomas Kuhn and the Revolution in the Teaching of Writing.”, Landmark Essays on Writing Process edited by Perl Sondra. Hermagoras Press 1994, pp.113–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hallenbeck Sarah . “Toward a Posthuman Perspective: Feminist Rhetorical Methodologies and Everyday Practices.” Advances in the History of Rhetoric , vol.15, no. 1 2012, pp.9–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Henry Jim . “(Re)Appraising the Performance of Technical Communicators From a Posthumanist Perspective.” Technical Communication Quarterly , vol.19, no. 1 2010, pp.11–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Henry Jim . Writing Workplace Cultures: An Archaeology of Professional Writing. Southern Illinois UP 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Herrington Anne Curtis Marcia . Persons in Process: Four Stories of Writing and Personal Development in College. National Council of Teachers of English 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Howard Rebecca Moore . “Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty.” College English , vol.57, no. 7 1995, pp.788–806.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Johnson-Eilola Johndan . “Relocating the Value of Work: Technical Communication in a Post-Industrial Age.” Technical Communication Quarterly , vol.5, no. 3 1996, , pp.245–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kain Donna Wardle Elizabeth . “Building Context: Using Activity Theory to Teach about Genre in Multi-Major Professional Communication Courses.” Technical Communication Quarterly , vol.14, no. 2 2005, pp.113–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Laquintano Tim . Mass Authorship and the Rise of Self-Publishing. U of Iowa P 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Latour Bruno . Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford UP 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lunsford Andrea . “Writing is Performative.”, Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies edited by Adler-Kassner Linda Wardle Elizabeth . UP of Colorado 2015, pp.43–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lunsford Andrea Ede Lisa . Writing Together: Collaboration in Theory and Practice. Bedford/St. Martin’s 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McCarthy Jacob E. et al. “Content Management in the Workplace: Community, Context, and a New Way to Organize Writing.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication , vol.25, no. 4 2011, pp.367–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Micciche Laura R. . “Writing Material.” College English , vol.76, no. 6 2014, pp.488–505.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Miller Elisabeth . “Literate Misfitting: Disability Theory and a Sociomaterial Approach to Literacy College English , vol.79, no. 1 2016, pp.34–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mirel Barbara . “Writing and Database Technology: Extending the Definition of Writing in the Workplace.”, Electronic Literacies in the Workplace: Technologies of Writing edited by Sullivan Patricia Dautermann Jennie . National Council of Teachers of English 1996, pp.91–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Murray Donald . “Teaching Writing as a Process Not Product.” The Leaflet 1972, pp.11–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. @ncte “Here are 5 GREAT reasons why students should write every day buff.ly/2xFiLRx #Why IWrite.” Twitter 20Oct 2017 6:08 p.m.. twitter.com/ncte/status/921528462514556928..
    [Google Scholar]
  41. New London Group “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.”, Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures edited by Cope B. Kalantzis M. . Routledge 2000, pp.9–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Paretti Marie C. McNair Lisa D. Holloway-Attaway Lissa . “Teaching Technical Communication in an Era of Distributed Work: A Case Study of Collaboration Between US and Swedish Students.” Technical Communication Quarterly , vol.16, no. 3 2007, pp.327–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Petersen Emily January . “Articulating Value amid Persistent Misconceptions about Technical and Professional Communication in the Workplace.” Technical Communication , vol.64, no. 3 2017, pp.210–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Prior Paul Shipka Jody . “Chronotopic Lamination: Tracing the Contours of Literate Activity.” Writing Selves/Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives edited by Bazerman Charles Russell David R. . WAC Clearinghouse 2003, pp.180–238. wac.colostate.edu/books/ selves_societies/.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rose Mark . Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Harvard UP 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Royster Jacqueline Jones . Traces of a Stream: Literacy and Social Change Among African American Women. U of Pittsburgh P 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Royster Jacqueline Jones . “When the First Voice You Hear Is Not Your Own.” College Composition and Communication , vol.47, no. 1 1996, pp.29–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Samuels Ellen . “Passing.”, Keywords for Disability Studies edited by Adams Rachel Reiss Benjamin Serlin David . NYU P 2016, pp.135–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Seeger Matthew W. . “Ethical Issues in Corporate Speechwriting.” Journal of Business Ethics , vol.11, no. 7 1992, pp.501–04.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Slack Jennifer D. Miller David J. Doak Jeffrey . “The Technical Communicator as Author: Meaning, Power, Authority”, Critical Power Tools edited by Blake Scott J. Longo Bernadette Katherine V. . Willis, SUNY Press 2006, pp.25–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Slattery Shaun . “Undistributing Work through Writing: How Technical Writers Manage Texts in Complex Information Environments.” Technical Communication Quarterly , vol.16, no. 3 2007, pp.311–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Solberg Janine . “Taking Shorthand for Literacy: Historicizing the Literate Activity of US Women in the Early Twentieth-Century Office.” Literacy in Composition Studies , vol.2, no. 1 2014, pp.1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Spinuzzi Clay . All Edge: Inside the New Workplace Networks. U of Chicago P 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Spinuzzi Clay . “Guest Editor’s Introduction: Technical Communication in the Age of Distributed Work.” Technical Communication Quarterly , vol.16, no. 3 2007, pp.265–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Spinuzzi Clay . Network: Theorizing Knowledge Work in Telecommunications. Cambridge UP 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Swarts Jason . “Recycled Writing: Assembling Actor Networks from Reusable Content.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication , vol.24, no. 2 2010, , pp.127–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Swarts Jason . “Technological Literacy as Network Building.” Technical Communication Quarterly , vol.20, no. 3 2011, pp.274–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Vieira Kate . American By Paper: How Documents Matter in Immigrant Literacy. U of Minnesota P 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Walker Sherrelle . “5 Reasons Why Your Students Should Write Every Day.” Scientific Learning,23Feb 2012, www.scilearn.com/blog/5-reasons-why-your-students-should-write-every-day. Accessed 23 October 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Watkins Evan . Literacy Work in the Reign of Human Capital. Fordham UP 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Wells Susan . Our Bodies, Ourselves and the Work of Writing. Stanford UP 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Kathleen Blake Yancey . Writing in the 21st Century: A Report from the National Council of Teachers of English. National Council of Teachers of English 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Yancey Kathleen Blake . Opening General Session, Conference on College Composition and Communication 15March 2018 Kansas City Convention Center Grand Ballroom Kansas City, MO
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ce201930150
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error