Valuing Editorial Collaborations as Scholarship: A Survey of Tenure and Promotion Documents

References

1. Armato Douglas. “What Was a University Press?”. U of Michigan P 2012 www.upress.umn.edu/about-us/history-and-fact-sheet-folder/what-was-a-university-press-1/ Accessed 1 Nov 2018.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Council of Editors of Learned Journals (CELJ). “The Contributions of Journal Editors to Their University Communities.” Society for Classical Studies 2009 classicalstudies.org/publications- and-research/contributions-of-journal-editors-their-university-communities. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Damrosch David. We Scholars: Changing the Culture of the University. Harvard UP 1995.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Day Michael et al. “What We Really Value: Redefining Scholarly Engagement in Tenure and Promotion Protocols.” College Composition and Communication , vol.61, no. 1 2013, , pp.185–208.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ede Lisa. “Collaboration, Authorship, and Resistance to Change.” Rhetoric and Writing Studies in the New Century: Historiography, Pedagogy, and Politics edited byGlenn Cheryl Mountford Roxanne. Southern Illinois UP 2017, , pp.48–62.
   [Google Scholar]
6. “Evaluating the Intellectual Work of Writing Administration.” Council of Writing Program Administrators 1998 wpacouncil.org/positions/intellectualwork.html. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hawisher Gail E. Selfe. Cynthia L.. “The Edited Collection: A Scholarly Contribution and More.” Publishing In Rhetoric and Composition edited by Olson Gary A. Taylor Todd W.. SUNY P 1997, , pp.103–18.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hawisher Gail E.. “On Editing and Contributing to the Field: The Everyday Work of Editors.” Pedagogy , vol.4, no. 1 2004, , pp.9–26.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Micciche Laura. “The Role of Edited Collections in Composition Studies.” Composition Forum , vol.12, no. 2 2001, , pp.101–24.
   [Google Scholar]
10. MLA Commission on Professional Service “Making Faculty Work Visible: Reinterpreting Professional Service, Teaching, and Research in the Fields of Language and Literature.” Profession 1996. MLA 1996, , pp.161–216.
    [Google Scholar]
11. MLA Committee on InformationTechnology “Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media.” MLA 2012 www.mla.org/About-Us/Governance/Committees/Committee-Listings/Professional-Issues/Committee-on-Information-Technology/Guide lines-for-Evaluating-Work-in-Digital-Humanities-and-Digital-Media. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
12. MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion “Report of the MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion.”, Profession 2007. MLA 2007, , pp.9–71.
    [Google Scholar]
13. “Scholarship in Composition: A Description for Department Chairs and Deans.” NCTE Conference on College Composition and Communication 1987 www2.ncte.org/statement/scholarship incomp/ Accessed 1 Nov. 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
14. “Scholarship in Rhetoric, Writing, and Composition: Guidelines for Faculty, Deans, and Department Chairs.” Conference on College Composition and Communication 2018 cccc.ncte.org/cccc/ resources/positions/scholarshipincomp 1Nov 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Sharer Wendy et al. editors Reclaiming Accountability: Improving Writing Programs through Accreditation and Large-Scale Assessment.. Utah State UP 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
16. “Symposium: Critical Retrospections on the 1987 CCCC Position Statement ‘Scholarship in Composition: Guidelines for Faculty Deans, and Department Chairs.’” College Composition and Communication , vol.66, no. 3 2015 , pp.500–46.
    [Google Scholar]