Skip to content
2018
Volume 79, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0010-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8178

Abstract

Arguments about literacy (and its boogeyman antonym, ) allow for, perhaps even insist upon, a certain degree of rhetorical flexibility. The idea of literacy slips into familiar commonplaces, hard to resist“or heard whether we mean them or not”in arguments with administrators, the public, our students, ourselves. Literacy’s trailing clouds include the sorts of promises that literacy scholars have learned to distrust, even as we’ve probably heard ourselves make them. None of the books in this review can sidestep these binds of literacy education, and in fact in their own ways, each of them embraces those binds as central to their analyses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce201728973
2017-03-01
2026-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce201728973
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test