Skip to content
2018
Volume 69, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0010-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8178

Abstract

The author examines how chronotopes—a term M. M. Bakhtin used to describe space-time relationships in literature—also characterize rhetorical arguments. She uses a case study of a series of debates about genetically modified foods (GMFs) in Canada to illustrate how chronotopes shape arguments along ideological lines. In particular, she suggests that dominant chronotopes, such as space-time compression or substantial equivalence, are linked with powerful ideologies, such as neoliberal capitalism or scientific positivism, in ways that limit alternative arguments based on sustainability or green politics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce20065832
2006-09-01
2026-05-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce20065832
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test