Skip to content
2018
Volume 66, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0010-0994
  • E-ISSN: 2161-8178

Abstract

The author argues that constructions of literacy that suppress or omit nonverbal elements such as the visual and the tactile are limiting students’ potential. She traces the way the historical relationship between image and word has consistently privileged language, and offers instances from her experience with students and with her own children to argue for a more reciprocal dynamic and a polymorphic literacy that can increase the scope and power of our literacy and our literacy teaching.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce20042857
2004-07-01
2026-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ce20042857
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test