Skip to content
2018
Volume 77, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0010-096X
  • E-ISSN: 1939-9006

Abstract

Writing studies scholarship lauds reflection’s capacity for building metacognitive understanding and facilitating transfer. Meanwhile, feminist and antiracist pedagogy scholarship highlights reflection’s ability to create spiritual and societal change. By contextualizing reflection within institutional and programmatic contexts, we argue that writing scholars can revise assignments to account for reflection’s contributions to civic and spiritual identity development. This cross-institutional case study analyzes patterns in first-year students’ reflective writing across three writing programs. Drawing on five codes for reflective identities—scholarly, writerly, professional, civic, and spiritual—we found that scholarly and writerly identities were emphasized regardless of context. However, students often had an “excess” in reflection, writing about civic and spiritual growth when prompts did not invite it. In conversation with university and program mission statements, we argue that instructors and WPAs can leverage reflection to expand beyond a single classroom context, ultimately tapping into its potential to create individual and social change.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2025772289
2025-12-01
2026-06-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berila Beth. Integrating Mindfulness into Anti-Oppression Pedagogy. Routledge 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell Lillian. “Foundations in Rhetoric Syllabus.” Marquette University. Fall 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Driscoll Dana, and Powell Roger. “States, Traits, and Dispositions: The Impact of Emotion on Writing Development and Writing Transfer Across College Courses and Beyond.” Composition Forum, vol. 34 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Emmons Kimberly. “Rethinking Genres of Reflection: Student Portfolio Cover Letters and the Narrative of Progress.” Composition Studies, vol. 31, no. 1 2002, pp 43–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. “First-Year Writing.” Elon University. www.elon.edu/u/academics/first-year-writing/. Accessed 30 July 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fiscus-Cannaday Jaclyn. Reflection-in-Motion: Reimagining Reflection in the Writing Classroom. Utah State UP 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gere Anne, et al. “Communal Justicing: Writing Assessment, Disciplinary Infrastructure, and the Case for Critical Language Awareness.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 72, no. 3 2021, pp 384–412.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Haswell Richard H. “NCTE/CCCC’s Recent War on Scholarship.” Written Communication, vol. 22, no. 2 2005, pp 198–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. hooks bell. Teaching Community: A Pedagogy of Hope. Routledge 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hsu V. Jo. “Reflection as Relationality: Rhetorical Alliances and Teaching Alternative Rhetorics.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 70, no. 2 2018, pp 142–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Inoue Asao. “2019 CCCC Chair’s Address: How Do We Language So People Stop Killing Each Other, or What Do We Do About White Language Supremacy?” College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 2 2019, pp 352–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Inoue Asao. Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and Inclusion in the Compassionate Writing Classroom. 2nd ed. The WAC Clearinghouse/UP of Colorado 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jankens Adrienne, and Latawiec Amy Ann. “Revising Reflection for Results in Teacher Research.” Composition Forum, vol. 46 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang Jialei. “Composing to Enact Affective Agency: Engaging Multimodal Antiracist Pedagogy in the First-Year Writing Classroom.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 75, no. 3 2024, pp 534–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kynard Carmen. Vernacular Insurrections: Race, Black Protest, and the New Century in Composition-Literacies Studies. SUNY P 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LeMesurier Jennifer Lin. “Winking at Excess: Racist Kinesiologies in Childish Gambino’s ‘This Is America.’” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 2 2020, pp 139–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lindenman Heather, et al. “Beyond the ‘Improvement Imperative’: Writing to Change Oneself and the World in First Year Composition.” Composition Studies, vol. 52 2024, pp 47–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lockett Alexandria L., et al., editors. Race, Rhetoric, and Research Methods. The WAC Clearinghouse/UP of Colorado 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Maraj Louis M. “You Can’t Do That Here: Black/Feminist Autoethnography and Histories of Intellectual Exclusion.” Self+Culture+Writing: Autoethnography for/as Writing Studies, edited by Jackson Rebecca L. and McKinnery Jackie Grutsch, UP of Colorado 2021, pp 175–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Martinez Aja. Counterstory: The Rhetoric and Writing of Critical Race Theory. NCTE 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Miller Elizabeth, et al. “Thinking about Feeling: The Roles of Emotion in Reflective Writing.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 74, no. 3 2023, pp 485–521.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. “Mission.” Florida State University. https://www.fsu.edu/about/mission-vision.html. Accessed 30 July 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. “Mission Statement.” Elon University. www.elon.edu/u/administration/mission-statement/. Accessed 30 July 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Neary Mike, and Hagyard Andy. “Pedagogy of Excess: An Alternative Political Economy of Student Life.” The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, edited by Molesworth Mike, et al., Routledge 2010, pp 223–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pianko Sharon. “Reflection: A Critical Component of the Composing Process.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 30, no. 3 1979, pp 275–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Raelin Joseph. “Public Reflection as the Basis of Learning.” Management Learning, vol. 32, no. 1 2001, pp 11–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ratcliffe Krista. Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness. Southern Illinois UP 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Robinson Michelle Bachelor. “A WPA Reflects on Assessing Black Women’s Writing During Intersectional Pandemics.” Writing Program Administration, vol. 44, no. 3 2021, pp 77–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rothschild Katherine, et al. “Disciplinarity and Transfer Ten Years Later: A Multi-Institutional Investigation into Student Perceptions of Learning to Write.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 76, no. 1 2024, pp 149–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rounsaville Angela. “Selecting Genres for Transfer: The Role of Uptake in Students’ Antecedent Genre Knowledge.” Composition Forum, vol. 26 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Smagorinsky Peter. “The Method Section as Conceptual Epicenter in Constructing Social Science Research Reports.” Written Communication, vol. 25, no. 3 2008, pp 389–411.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tharp Alli, and Johnston Emily. “Actionable Empathy through Rhetorical Listening: A Possible Future for First-Year Composition.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 74, no. 4 2023, pp 731–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Villanueva Victor. Bootstraps: From an American Academic of Color. NCTE 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. “Vision Statement.” Marquette University. https://www.marquette.edu/about/mission.php. Accessed 30 July 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Warren John T. “Bodily Excess and the Desire for Absence: Whiteness and the Making of (Raced) Educational Subjectivities.” Performance Theories in Education, edited by Alexander Bryant Keith, et al., Routledge 2004, pp 83–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Yancey Kathleen. “2018 CCCC Exemplar Award Acceptance Speech. Believing in the Cause: Composing’s Past, Present, and Future.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 1 2018, pp 159–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Yancey Kathleen. “Defining Reflection: The Rhetorical Nature and Qualities of Reflection.” A Rhetoric of Reflection. Utah State UP 2016, pp 303–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Yancey Kathleen, et al. “Readiness to Learn: Variations in How Students Engage with the Teaching for Transfer Curriculum.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 75, no. 2 2023, pp 248–78.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2025772289
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2025772289
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test