Skip to content
2018
Volume 77, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0010-096X
  • E-ISSN: 1939-9006
side by side viewer icon HTML
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2025771A1
2025-09-01
2026-06-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ccc/77/1/collegecompositionandcommunication771A1.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2025771A1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Blewett Kelly, et al. “Editing as Inclusion Activism.” College English, vol. 81, no. 4 2019, pp 273–96, https://publicationsncte.org/content/journals/10.58680/ce201930081.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI. “Working Paper 2: Generative AI and Policy Development: Guidance from the MLA-CCCC Task Force.” Apr 2024, https://aiandwriting.hcommons.org/working-paper-2/.
  3. Sano-Franchini Jennifer. “Timely, (Un)Disciplinary, and Solutions-Oriented: Remembering and Enacting Abundance in These Times When We Just Have to Keep Going.” College Composition and Communication National Convention, 10Apr 2025, Baltimore Convention Center, Baltimore, MD. Chair’s Address.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sano-Franchini Jennifer, et al. “Refusing GenAI in Writing Studies: A Quickstart Guide.” Refusing GenAI in Writing Studies, Nov 2024, https://refusinggenai.wordpress.com/. Accessed 8 Sept. 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Adler-Kassner Linda, et al. “Assembling Knowledge: The Role of Threshold Concepts in Facilitating Transfer.” Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transfer, edited byAnson Chris M. and Moore Jesse L., WAC Clearinghouse/UP of Colorado 2016, pp 17–47. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/ansonmoore/transfer.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Adler-Kassner Linda, and Wardle Elizabeth, editors. Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies. Utah State UP 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Anson Chris M. “AI-Based Text Generation and the Social Construction of ‘Fraudulent Authorship’: A Revisitation.” Composition Studies Journal, vol. 50, no. 1 2022, pp 37–46, https://compositionstudiesjournal.files.wordpress.com/2022/07/anson.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jamieson Sandra. “The AI ‘Crisis’ and A (Re)turn to Pedagogy.” Composition Studies Journal, vol. 50. no. 3 2022, pp 153–57, https://compositionstudiesjournal.files.wordpress.com/2023/03/jamieson.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lowe Kimberly A., et al.Student-Led Peer Review: A Practical Guide to Implementation across Disciplines and Modalities. Routledge 2022, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447221.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Melzer Dan. “Responding for Transfer.” Composition Forum, vol. 50, Fall 2022, https://compositionforum.com/issue/50/responding-transfer.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI. “Working Paper 3: Building a Culture for Generative AI Literacy in College Language, Literature, and Writing.” Oct 2024, https://aiandwriting.hcommons.org/working-paper-3/.
  12. Nagelhout Ryan. “Students Are Using AI Already. Here’s What They Think Adults Should Know.” Harvard Graduate School of Education. 10Sept 2024, https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/usable-knowledge/24/09/students-are-using-ai-already-heres-what-they-think-adults-should-know.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nam Jane. “56% of College Students Have Used AI on Assignments or Exams.” BestColleges, 22Nov 2023, https://www.bestcolleges.com/research/most-col-lege-students-have-used-ai-survey/.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Roger Williams University Department of Writing Studies, Rhetoric, and Composition. Thinking Rhetorically: Writing for Professional and Public Audiences. Press-books 2020, https://rwu.pressbooks.pub/thinkingrhetorically/.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. American Association of University Professors. “Background Facts on Contingent Faculty Positions.” www.aaup.org/issues/contingency/background-facts. Accessed 1 Mar. 2025.
  16. American Federation of Teachers. “An Army of Temps: AFT Adjunct Faculty Quality of Work/Life Report.” Feb 2020, www.aft.org/sites/default/files/media/2022/qualitylifereport_feb2022.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar. 2025.
  17. Artman Bryan, et al. “Teacher-Directed Professional Development: An Alternative to Conventional Professional Development.” International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, vol. 17, no. 1 2020, pp 39–50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344750515. Accessed 21 May 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bannister Peter, and Carver Mark. “‘I Don’t Need Professional Development; I Want Institutional Development’: Legitimising Marginalised Epistemic Capital That Disrupts Generative AI Discourse.” Professional Development in Education, vol. 51, pp. 547–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2427873. Accessed 1 Mar. 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Christie Amanda, and Dean Ann C.. “Working Conditions for Contingent Faculty in First-Year Composition Courses at Two-Year Colleges.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 50, no. 1 2022, pp 47–75, https://publicationsncte.org/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc202232192.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Colby Glenn. “Data Snapshot: Tenure and Contingency in US Higher Education.” American Association of University Professors, Mar 2023, https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/AAUP%20Data%20Snapshot.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar. 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Digital Education Council. “Global AI Faculty Survey 2025: AI Meets Academia: What Faculty Think.” www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/post/digital-education-council-global-ai-faculty-survey. Accessed 1 Mar. 2025.
  22. Jolley Michael R., et al. “A Critical Challenge: The Engagement and Assessment of Contingent, Part-Time Adjunct Faculty Professors in United States Community Colleges.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 38, nos. 2–3 2013, pp 218–30. Taylor & Francis Online, https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2014.851969. Accessed 22 May 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kasneci Enkelejda, et al. “ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education.” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274. Accessed 1 Mar. 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI. “Working Paper 3: Building a Culture for Generative AI Literacy in College Language, Literature, and Writing.” Oct 2024, https://aiandwriting.hcommons.org/working-paper-3/. Accessed 21 May 2025.
  25. National Council of Teachers of English. Shifting from Professional Development to Professional Learning: Centering Teacher Empowerment. 30June 2019, https://ncte.org/statement/proflearning/. Accessed 21 May 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Watson C. Edward, and Rainie Lee. “Leading through Disruption: Higher Education Executives Assess AI’s Impacts on Teaching and Learning.” American Association of Colleges and Universities/Elon University’s Imagining the Digital Future Center, Jan 2025, https://imaginingthedigitalfuture.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/AI_higher_ed_Elon_AACU_report-1.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar. 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Flaherty Colleen. “Making Faculty Identities Visible, for Students’ Sake.” Inside Higher Ed, 24Apr 2024, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/academic-life/2024/04/24/when-professors-share-identities-students-can-benefit/.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc2025771A1
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test