Skip to content
2018
Volume 77, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0010-096X
  • E-ISSN: 1939-9006

Abstract

I argue that composition studies must build critical awareness about how humans from the Global South train AI with their writing embodiments. To draw our attention to how those working in the Global South train AI in harmful conditions, even though AI companies use algorithms and terms of service to smooth away these embodiments, I adapt the concept of humans-in-the-loop. Critical awareness of humans-in-the-loop moves scholarship in writing studies from a focus on AI-human collaboration that begins after an AI produces a text to one that requires us to see how AI products are always already human authored. Through a case study of Google Translate, I demonstrate how a critical awareness of how AI can erase the writing embodiment of humans-in-the-loop affords me opportunities to ask generative questions: How does language translation play a role in the erasure of embodied writing? Why does AI produce with bias toward marginalized populations when marginalized populations are those that moderate AI? Overall, I ask compositionists to see AI products as already human authored so that writing studies can consider the invisible labor of humans-in-the-loop as the field moves forward in researching AI.

© 2025 by the National Council of Teachers of English
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202577139
2025-09-01
2026-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aguilar Gabriel Lorenzo. “Rhetorically Training Students to Generate with AI: Social Justice Applications for AI as Audience.” Computers and Composition, vol. 71 2024, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102828.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson Salena Sampson. “‘Places to Stand’: Multiple Metaphors for Framing ChatGPT’s Corpus.” Computers and Composition, vol. 68 2023, pp 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102778.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anzaldúa Gloria. Borderlands: La Frontera. 4th ed., Aunt Lute Books 1987.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arora A., et al. “Risk and the Future of AI: Algorithmic Bias, Data Colonialism, and Marginalization.” Information and Organization, vol. 33, no. 3, Sept 2023, ScienceDirect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100478.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ankita B, et al. “Impact of Explainable AI on Reduction of Algorithm Bias in Facial Recognition Technologies.” 2024 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS) 2024, pp 85–89. IEEE Xplore, https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS61124.2024.10534745.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bedington Andelyn, et al. “Writing with Generative AI and Human-Machine Teaming: Insights and Recommendations from Faculty and Students.” Computers and Composition, vol. 71, Mar 2024, ScienceDirect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102833.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bitter Alex. “Amazon’s Just Walk Out Technology Relies on Hundreds of Workers in India Watching You Shop.” Business Insider, 3Apr 2024, https://www.businessinsider.com/amazons-just-walk-out-actually-1-000-people-in-india-2024-4.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bratta Phil, and Powell Malea. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Entering the Cultural Rhetorics Conversations.” enculturation: A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing, and Culture, no. 21 2016, https://enculturation.net/entering-the-cultural-rhetorics-conversations.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Breslow Jacob. “Moderating the ‘Worst of Humanity’: Sexuality, Witnessing, and the Digital Life of Coloniality.” Porn Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, July 2018, pp 225–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2018.1472034.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Carradini Stephen. “On the Current Moment in AI: Introduction to Special Issue on Effects of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Technical Communi-cation Pedagogy, Practice, and Research, Part 1.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 38, no. 3 2024, pp 187–98. SAGE Journals, https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519241239638.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Clayson Ashley. “Distributed Writing as a Lens for Examining Writing as Embodied Practice.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, July 2018, pp 217–26. Taylor and Francis Online, https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2018.1479607.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Couldry Nick, and Mejias Ulises A.. “Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject.” Television & New Media, vol. 20, no. 4, May 2019, pp 336–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Couldry Nick, and Mejias Ulises A.. “Making Data Colonialism Liveable: How Might Data’s Social Order Be Regulated?” Internet Policy Review, vol. 8, no. 2, June 2019 policyreview.info, https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/making-data-colonialism-liveable-how-might-datas-social-order-be-regulated.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cushman Ellen, et al. “Delinking: Toward Pluriversal Rhetorics.” College English, vol. 84, no. 1 2021, pp 7–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. David Emmanuel. “Outsourced Heroes and Queer Incorporations: Labor Brokerage and the Politics of Inclusion in the Philippine Call Center Industry.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, vol. 22, no. 3 2016, pp 381–408.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dutra Natalia B. “Las Vidas Negras Importan.” GALEO, 14July 2020, https://galeo.org/es/2020/07/las-vidas-negras-importan/.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Erby Brandon M. “Imagining Freedom: Cultural Rhetorics, Digital Literacies, and Podcasting in Prison.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 75, no. 1, Sept 2023, pp 224–41. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc202332676.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gallagher John R. “The Ethics of Writing for Algorithmic Audiences.” Computers and Composition, vol. 57, no. 4 2020, 102583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102583.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Grayson Mara Lee. “Assimilation/Appropriation: What Jewish Discourses in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies Tell Us about the Limitations of Inclusion.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 75, no. 1, Sept 2023, pp 56–74. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc202332667.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Haas Christina, and Witte Stephen P.. “Writing as an Embodied Practice: The Case of Engineering Standards.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 15, no. 4 2001, pp 413–57. SAGE Journals, https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190101500402.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hallsby Atilla. “A Copious Void: Rhetoric as Artificial Intelligence 1.0.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 54, no. 3, May 2024, pp 232–46. Taylor and Francis Online, https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2024.2343265.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson Thaddeus L., and Johnson Natasha N.. “Police Facial Recognition Technology Can’t Tell Black People Apart.” Scientific American, 23May 2023, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/police-facial-recognition-technology-cant-tell-black-people-apart/.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson-Eilola Johndan, et al. “Can Artificial Intelligence Robots Write Effective Instructions?” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 338, no. 3 2024, pp 199–212. SAGE Journals, https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519241239641.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Jones Natasha N. “The Technical Communicator as Advocate: Integrating a Social Justice Approach in Technical Communication.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 46, no. 3 2016, pp 342–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616639472.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Knowles Alan M. “Machine-in-the-Loop Writing: Optimizing the Rhetorical Load.” Computers and Composition, vol. 71 2024, 102826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102826.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kong Yeqing, and Ding Huiling. “Tools, Potential, and Pitfalls of Social Media Screening: Social Profiling in the Era of AI-Assisted Recruiting.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 38, no. 1, Jan 2024, pp 33–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519231199478.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. LeMesurier Jennifer Lin. “Mobile Bodies: Triggering Bodily Uptake through Movement.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 68, no. 2 2016, pp 292–316.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Li Ruth. “A ‘Dance of Storytelling’: Dissonances between Substance and Style in Collaborative Storytelling with AI.” Computers and Composition, vol. 71 2024, 102825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102825.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lubin Kem-Laurin, and Harris Randy Allen. “Sex after Technology: The Rhetoric of Health Monitoring Apps and the Reversal of Roe v. Wade.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 54, no. 3, May 2024, pp 247–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2024.2343266.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Mack M. B. “AI Startup Backed by Microsoft Revealed to Be 700 Indian Employees Pretending to Be Chatbots.” Latin Times, 3June 2025, https://www.latintimes.com/ai-startup-backed-microsoft-revealed-700-indian-employees-pretending-chatbots-584240.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mallette Jennifer C. “Preparing Future Technical Editors for an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Workplace.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 38, no. 2 2024, pp 205–39. SAGE Journals, https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519241239950.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Montreal AI Ethics Institute. When Algorithms Infer Pregnancy or Other Sensitive Information About People. 2Nov 2020, https://montrealethics.ai/when-algorithms-infer-pregnancy-or-other-sensitive-information-about-people/.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Omondi Michael. “Google Doubles Up on Africa Commitment with a Further $5.8 Million towards AI Skilling and Education - Kenya News Agency.” KNA6, 29Oct 2024, https://www.kenyanews.go.ke/google-doubles-up-on-africa-commitment-with-a-further-5-8-million-towards-ai-skilling-and-education/.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Perrigo Billy. “150 AI Workers Vote to Unionize at Nairobi Meeting.” Time, 1May 2023, https://time.com/6275995/chatgpt-facebook-african-workers-union/.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Ricaurte Paola. “Data Epistemologies, The Coloniality of Power, and Resistance.” Television & New Media, vol. 20, no. 4, May 2019, pp 350–65. SAGE Journals, https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Riley-Mukavetz Andrea. “Another Temporarily Hopeful Intervention: Cultural Rhetorics as a Commitment to Indigenous Sovereignty, Cultural Continuance, and Repatriation of Land and Life.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 75, no. 1, Sept 2023, pp 23–36. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc202332665.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Riley-Mukavetz Andrea. “Developing a Relational Scholarly Practice: Snakes, Dreams, and Grandmothers.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 4 2020, pp 545–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Rowe Niamh. “‘It’s Destroyed Me Completely’: Kenyan Moderators Decry Toll of Training of AI Models.” The Guardian, 2Aug 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/aug/02/ai-chatbot-training-human-toll-content-moderator-meta-openai.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Selber Stuart. “An AI Manifesto for Technical Communication Programs: AI Is Evolutionary, Not Revolutionary.” Macmillan and BFW Teaching Community, 1Oct 2024, https://community.macmillanlearning.com/t5/bits-blog/an-ai-manifesto-for-technical-communication-programs-ai-is/ba-p/22494.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Sham Abdallah Hussein, et al. “Ethical AI in Facial Expression Analysis: Racial Bias.” Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 17, no. 2, Mar 2023, pp 399–406. Springer Nature Link, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-022-02246-8.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Siapera Eugenia. “AI Content Moderation, Racism and (de)Coloniality.” International Journal of Bullying Prevention, vol. 4, no. 1, Mar 2022, pp 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-021-00105-7.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Stahl Lesley, et al. “Kenyan Workers with AI Jobs Thought They Had Tickets to the Future until the Grim Reality Set In.” CBS News, 24Nov 2024, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-work-kenya-exploitation-60-minutes/.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Steiger Miriah, et al. “The Psychological Well-Being of Content Moderators: The Emotional Labor of Commercial Moderation and Avenues for Improving Support.” Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery 2021, pp 1–14. ACM Digital Library, https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445092.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Training AI Takes Heavy Toll on Kenyans Working for $2 an Hour. Directed by 60 Minutes, 24Nov 2024 YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZS50KXjAX0.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Vega Karrieann. “Amplifying Autogestión and Cultural Rhetorics of Resistance.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 75, no. 1, Sept 2023, pp 37–55. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc202332666.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. West-Puckett Stephanie, et al. “Engaging Assessment Counterstories through a Cultural Rhetorics Framework.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 75, no. 1 2023, pp 186–203.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202577139
Loading
AI Writing Is Always Embodied: Building a Critical Awareness of the Invisible Labor of Humans-in-the-Loop in AI Products
College Composition & Communication 77, 39 (2025); https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc202577139
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202577139
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202577139
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test