Symposium: On Generative AI

References

1. Chen Yanda, et al. “Reasoning Models Don’t Always Say What They Think.” Anthropic. Apr 2025, https://assets.anthropic.com/m/71876fabef0f0ed4/original/reasoning_models_paper.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
2. “Generative AI Guidance for Authors and Reviewers.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 2024, journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/gen-ai. Accessed 23 May 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Jazwinska Klaudia, and Chandrasekar Aisvarya. “AI Search Has a Citation Problem.” Columbia Journalism Review. 6Mar 2025, www.cjr.org/tow_center/we-compared-eight-ai-search-engines-theyre-all-bad-at-citing-news.php. Accessed 23 May 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Lindsey Jacket al. “On the Biology of a Large Language Model.” Transformer Circuits Thread. Mar 2025, https://transformer-circuits.pub/2025/attri-bution-graphs/biology.html. Accessed 23 May 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Peters Uwe, and Chin-Yee Benjamin. “Generalization Bias in Large Language Model Summarization of Scientific Research.” Royal Society Open Science, vol. 12, no. 4 2025, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241776. Accessed 23 May 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Purdy James P. “The Construction of Authorship and Writing in Journal and Publisher AI Policy Statements.” Composing with AI, edited byRanade Nupoor and Eyman Douglas, forthcoming.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Rahman-Jones Imran. “AI Chatbots Unable to Accurately Summarise News, BBC Finds.” BBC. 11Feb 2025, www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0m17d8827ko. Accessed 23 May 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Salvaggio Eryk. “A Personalized Ecology of AI.” Cybernetic Forests. 11May 2025, https://mail.cyberneticforests.com/a-personalized-ecology-of-ai/. Accessed 23 May 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Sano-Franchini Jennifer, McIntyre Megan, and Fernandes Maggie. “Refusing GenAI in Writing Studies: A Quickstart Guide.” Refusing Generative AI in Writing Studies. Nov 2024, https://refusinggenai.wordpress.com. Accessed 23 May 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
10. You Josh. “How Much Energy Does Chat-GPT Use?” Gradient Updates. Epoch AI. Feb 2025, https://epoch.ai/gradient-updates/how-much-energy-does-chatgpt-use. Accessed 23 May 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Burris Sarah, and Leander Kevin. “Critical Posthumanist Literacy: Building Theory for Reading, Writing, and Living Ethically with Everyday Artificial Intelligence.” Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 59, no. 4 2024, pp 560–69.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Clark-Oates Angela, et al. “Un-Black Boxing Academic Integrity: Students as Innovators.” AI2 Summit, 18Feb 2025, Orlando, FL.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Conference on College Composition and Communication. Position Statement on Citation Justice in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies. National Council of Teachers of English, Nov 2022, https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/citation-justice.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Conference on College Composition and Communication. Scholarship in Rhetoric, Writing, and Composition: Guidelines for Faculty, Deans, and Chairs. National Council of Teachers of English, Mar 2018, https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/scholarshipincompc.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kalantzis Mary, and Cope Bill. “Literacy in the Time of Artificial Intelligence.” Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 60, no. 1 2025, article e591, https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.591.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Liu Yameng, and Young Richard E.. “Disciplinary Assumptions and Institutional Imperatives: Structural Tensions in the Pedagogy of Rhetoric.” JAC, vol. 18, no. 3 1998, pp 475–87.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Matzke Aurora, and Rivera Nora. “Bad Idea: AI Creates Shortcuts for Good Thinking. Generative Idea: AI Creates Opportunities for More Complex Critical Thinking.” Bad Ideas about AI and Writing, manuscript in review.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Mignolo Walter D. “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom.” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 26, no. 7-8 2010, pp 159–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275. Originally published 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Morrison Toni. The Nobel Lecture in Literature. Nobel Prize 1993 https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1993/morrison/lecture/.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Noble Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York UP 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Perrault Raymond, and Clark Jack. Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024. Stanford HAI 2024, https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Phan Vi, et al. “The Stories We Tell: A Student-Driven Systematic Analysis of Writing Center ‘AI’ Policies.” International Writing Center Association Conference, 25Oct 2024, Online.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sanchez-Acedo Alberto, et al. “The Challenges of Media and Information Literacy in the Artificial Intelligence Ecology: Deepfakes and Misinformation.” Communication & Society, vol. 37, no. 4 2024, pp 223–39. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.223-239.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sano-Franchini Jennifer. “2025 Chair’s Address.” Conference on College Composition and Communication, 10Apr 2025, Baltimore Convention Center, Baltimore, MD.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Truth Sojourner. I Sell the Shadow to Support the Substance[Photograph]. ca 1864 Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/98502976/.
    [Google Scholar]
26. United Nations Environment Programme. Artificial Intelligence (AI) End-to-End: The Environmental Impact of the Full AI Lifecycle Needs to Be Comprehensively Assessed. Issue Note 2024, https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/46288.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Williamson Shawn M., and Prybutok Victoria. “The Era of Artificial Intelligence Deception: Unraveling the Complexities of False Realities and Emerging Threats of Misinformation.” Information, vol. 15, no. 6 2024, article 299, https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060299.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Wynter Sylvia. “A Black Studies Manifesto.” Forum N.H.I.: Knowledge for the 21st Century, vol. 1, no. 1 1994, pp 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Wynter Sylvia. “Unsettling Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation—An Argument.” CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 3, no. 3 2003, pp 257–337.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Aljuaid Hind. “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Tools on Academic Writing Instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic Review.” Arab World English Journal, special issue on ChatGPT, Apr 2024 SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4814342.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Arreguin Alex, and Wilson Stacey. Literacy Learning Program (Mesa Community College). Decoding the Disciplines Workshop, 7Feb 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Bell Roger, and Candlin Christopher, editors. Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice. Routledge 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Bourelle Tiffany, et al.Administering Writing Programs in the Twenty-First Century. Modern Language Association 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Eco Umberto. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Reprint ed., Indiana UP 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Erard Michael. “How to Design Metaphor.” Aeon, 9June 2015, https://aeon.co/essays/how-to-build-a-metaphor-to-change-people-s-minds.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ess Henk van. “‘Doc Casts’ Now Available in 50 Languages: Breaking Language Barriers for Investigators, Journalists, and Anyone Drowning in PDFs.” Digital Digging Blog, 29Apr 2025, https://www.digitaldigging.org/p/doc-casts-now-available-in-50-languages.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Genette Gérard. “Paratexts in the Translation of Tourism Texts: Adaptation of Online Peripheral Content.” Translation and Communication in the Promotion of Business Tourism: Emerging Research and Opportunities. IGI Global Scientific Publishing 2020, pp 147–58.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gentner Dedre, and Wolff Phillip. “Alignment in the Processing of Metaphor.” Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 37, no. 3 1997, pp 331–55, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749596X97925274.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hannah Mark A., and Saidy Christina. “Locating the Terms of Engagement: Shared Language Development in Secondary to Postsecondary Writing Transitions.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 66, no. 1 2014, pp 120–144. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/43490904.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hawkins Brittanyet al. “Summarise, Elaborate, Try Again: Exploring the Effect of Feedback Literacy on AI-Enhanced Essay Writing.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Apr 2025, pp 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2492070.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Merino-Campos C. “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Personalized Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review.” Trends in Higher Education, vol. 4, no. 2 2025, p 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu4020017.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Nord Christine. “Paratranslation - A New Paradigm or a Re-Invented Wheel?” Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, vol. 20, no. 4 2012, pp 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2012.726231.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Zao-Sanders Marc. “How People Are Really Using Gen AI in 2025.” Harvard Business Review, 9Apr 2025, https://hbr.org/2025/04/how-people-are-really-using-gen-ai-in-2025.
    [Google Scholar]