Skip to content
2018
Volume 77, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0010-096X
  • E-ISSN: 1939-9006
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

In a relatively short time, market and political forces have intensified the reach of artificial intelligence (AI). AI has become, in a word, climatic—not only a discrete technological system but also a creeping assemblage of ideological, material, and political forces. This article tracks these forces by developing rhetorical climates of AI as a conceptual framework. In doing so, I aim to (1) link the harms of climate change with the rapid buildout of AI infrastructure and (2) shift the frame of the conversation by emphasizing the extractive, exploitative, enclosed, and knotted supremacist conditions that have been prerequisites for building AI systems at scale. While these pervading rhetorical climates may seem unchangeable, I track how microclimates of resistance have developed, in the past and in the present. In particular, I emphasize the importance of bodily intelligence in navigating asymmetrical conditions of power felt in the AI industry. The article concludes by discussing how rhetoric and writing studies can weather the unfolding rhetorical climates of AI by diagnosing conditions, seizing moments, and plotting futures to imagine a less extractive and less harmful world.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202577113
2025-09-01
2026-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ccc/77/1/collegecompositionandcommunication77113.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202577113&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bedington Andelynet al. “Writing with Generative AI and Human-Machine Teaming: Insights and Recommendations from Faculty and Students.” Computers and Composition, vol. 71, Mar 2024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102833.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bender Emily M., and Hanna Alex. The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want. HarperCollins 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bender Emily M., et al. “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? i.” Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ACM 2021, pp 610–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benjamin Ruha. “The New Artificial Intelligentsia.” The LA Times Review ofBooks 2024 https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-new-artificial-intelligentsia/.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benjamin Ruha. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Toolsfor the New Jim Code. Polity 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Benjamin Ruha. “Who Owns the Future? The Artificial Intelligentsia & the New Eugenics.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZseJigkUhuE. Tanner Lectures, Cambridge, MA.
  7. Bjork Collin. “Extractive AI and Its Challenge to Technical Communication.” Journal ofBusiness and Technical Communication, vol. 39, no. 4 2025, pp 504–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carlson Erin Brock. “Metis as Embodied, Technofeminist Intervention: Rhetorically Listening to Periods for Pence.” Computers and Composition, vol. 51 2019, pp 14–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Crawford Kate. Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale UP 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Detienne Marcel, and Vernant Jean-Pierre. Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society. Translated byLloyd Janet, U Chicago P 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dolmage Jay. “Metis, Metis, Mestizo, Medusa: Rhetorical Bodies across Rhetorical Traditions.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 28, no. 1 2009, pp 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190802540690.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Du Bois W. E. B.Darkwater: Voices from within the Veil. Harcourt, Brace and Howe 1920.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Edwards Dustin. Enduring Digital Damage: Rhetorical Reckonings for Planetary Survival. U of Alabama P, in press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Edwards Dustin, et al. “The Making of Critical Data Center Studies.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 31, no. 2, Apr 2025, pp 429–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fernandes Maggie, and McIntyre Megan. “Recoveries and Reconsiderations: Linguistic Justice and Storying Resistance to Generative AI.” Peitho, vol. 27, no. 2 2025, pp 66–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gallagher John R. “The Ethics of Writing for Algorithmic Audiences.” Computers and Composition, vol. 57, Sept 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102583.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gebru Timnit, and Torres Emile P.. “The TESCREAL Bundle: Eugenics and the Promise of Utopia through Artificial General Intelligence.” First Monday 2024, http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/13636.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ghimire Asmita. “Utilizing ChatGPT to Integrate World English and Diverse Knowledge: A Transnational Perspective in Critical Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy.” Computers and Composition, vol. 75, Mar 2025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102913.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hao Karen. Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman’s OpenAI. Penguin Press 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hawhee Debra. Bodily Arts: Rhetoric and Athletics in Ancient Greece. U of Texas P 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hawhee Debra. A Sense of Urgency: How the Climate Crisis Is Changing Rhetoric. U of Chicago P 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hawisher Gail E., and Selfe Cynthia L.. “The Rhetoric of Technology and the Electronic Writing Class.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 42, no. 1, Feb 1991, pp 55–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hogan Mél, and LePage-Richer Théo. “Extractive AI.” Climate Justice and Technology Essay Series. Center for Media, Technology, and Democracy 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ingraham Chriset al.Rhetorical Climatology: By a Reading Group. Michigan State UP 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Janangelo Joseph. “Technopower and Technoppression: Some Abuses of Power and Control in Computer-Assisted Writing Environments.” Computers and Composition, vol. 9, no. 1 1991, pp 47–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kopelson Karen. “Rhetoric on the Edge of Cunning; Or, the Performance of Neutrality (Re)Considered as a Composition Pedagogy for Student Resistance.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 55, no. 1, Sept 2003, pp 115–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kynard Carmen. “When Robots Come Home to Roost: The Differing Fates of Black Language, Hyper-Standardization, and White Robotic School Writing (Yes, ChatGPT and His AI Cousins).” Education, Liberation & Black Radical Traditions for the 21st Century. 11Dec 2023, http://carmenkynard.org/when-robots-come-home-to-roost.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Luccioni Sasha, et al. “Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?” Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lurye Sharon, and Bryan Claire. “Takeaways from Our Investigation on AI-Powered School Surveillance.” AP News, 12Mar 2025, https://apnews.com/article/ai-school-chromebook-surveillance-gaggle-investigation-takeaways-381fa82978f27eb85f20d03236820711.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. McIntyre Megan. “Equitable Writing Classrooms and Programs in the Shadow of AI.” Computers and Composition, vol. 75 2025, 102908.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Noble Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York UP 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Owusu-Ansah Alfred L. “Defining Moments, Definitive Programs, and the Continued Erasure of Missing People.” Composition Studies, vol. 51, no. 1 2023, pp 143–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Perrigo Billy. “Exclusive: OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 Per Hour to Make ChatGPT Less Toxic.” Time. 18Jan 2023, https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/.
  34. Sadowski Jathan. The Mechanic and the Luddite: A Ruthless Criticism of Technology and Capitalism. U of California P 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sano-Franchini Jennifer, et al. “Refusing GenAI in Writing Studies: A Quickstart Guide.” Refusing Generative AI in Writing Studies. Nov 2024, https://refusinggenai.wordpress.com.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Scott James C.Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale UP 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Selfe Cynthia L., and Selfe Richard J.. “The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 45, no. 4 1994, pp 480–504.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shan Shawn, et al. “What Is Nightshade?” Nightshade: Protecting Copyright, https://nightshade.cs.uchicago.edu/whatis.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sharpe Christina. In the Wake: On Blackness and Being. Duke UP 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Simmons Kristen. “Settler Atmospherics.” Society for Cultural Anthropology, 20Nov 2017, https://culanth.org/fieldsights/settler-atmospherics.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tarnoff Ben. “Weizenbaum’s Nightmares: How the Inventor of the First Chatbot Turned against AI.” The Guardian, 25July 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/25/joseph-weizenbaum-inventor-eliza-chatbot-turned-against-artificial-intelligence-ai.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. “Trapping AI.” Algorithmic Sabotage Research Group, 13June 2024, https://algorithmic-sabotage.github.io/asrg/trapping-ai.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Vance JD. “The Universities Are the Enemy.” National Conservatism Conference, 2Nov 2021, Orlando, Florida. Keynote Address. https://nationalconservatism.org/natcon-2-2021/presenters/jd-vance/.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Vee Annette. “Large Language Models Write Answers.” Composition Studies, vol. 51, no. 1 2023, pp.176–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang Chaoran, and Wang Zhaozhe. “Investigating L2 Writers’ Critical AI Literacy in AI-Assisted Writing: An APSE Model.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 67, Mar 2025, 101187. ScienceDirect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101187.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Weizenbaum Joseph. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. W. H. Freeman 1976.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wheeler Stephanie K. “Engaging Metis as a Site of Disability Activist and Leadership Possibilities,” Reflections, no. 23, vol. 2 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wilkes Lydia. “Some Ethical Considerations for Teaching and Generative AI in Higher Education,” Teaching and Generative AI: Pedagogical Possibilities and Productive Tensions, edited byBuyserie Beth and Thurston Travis N., Digital Commons at Utah State U 2024 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/teachingai/42/.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wittenberg Ariel. “‘How Come I Can’t Breathe?’: Musk’s Data Company Draws a Backlash in Memphis.” Politico, 6May 2025, https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/06/elon-musk-xai-memphis-gas-turbines-air-pollution-permits-00317582.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Woods Clyde. “Les Miserables of New Orleans: Trap Economics and the Asset Stripping Blues, Part 1.” American Quarterly, vol. 61, no. 3 2009, pp 769–96.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/ccc202577113
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test