Writing for Perspective: A Case Study of Literacy Practices and Personal Agency among Latinos/Latinas in Northwest Arkansas

References

1. Alvarez Steven. “Taco Literacy: Public Advocacy and Mexican Food in the U.S. Nuevo South.” Composition Studies, vol. 45, no. 2 2017, pp 151–66.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson Paul, et al. “The Contributions of Writing to Learning and Development: Results from a Large-Scale Multi-Institutional Study.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 50, no. 2 2015, pp 199–235.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Artze-Vega Isis, et al. “Más Allá del Inglés: A Bilingual Approach to College Composition.” Teaching Writing with Latino/a Students: Lessons Learned at Hispanic Serving Institutions edited by Kirklighter Cristina, et al., State U of New York P 2007, pp 99–117.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baca Isabel. “It Is All in the Attitude— The Language Attitude.” Teaching Writing with Latino/a Students: Lessons Learned at Hispanic Serving Institutions edited by Kirklighter Cristina, et al., State U of New York P 2007, pp 145–68.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baca Isabel, et al. editors Bordered Writers: Latinx Identities and Literacy Practices at Hispanic-Serving Institutions. State U of New York P 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bandura Albert. “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 1, no. 2 2006, pp 164–80.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bhabha Homi K. The Location of Culture. Routledge 1994.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bizzell Patricia. “Hybrid Academic Discourses: What, Why, How.” Composition Studies, vol. 27, no. 2 1999, pp 7–21.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bou Ayash Nancy. Toward Translingual Realities in Composition: (Re)Working Local Language Representations and Practices. Utah State UP 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brandt Deborah. Literacy in American Lives. Cambridge UP 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cedillo Christina V., and Bratta Phil. “Relating Our Experiences: The Practice of Positionality Stories in Student-Centered Pedagogy.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 2 2019, pp 215–40.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cintron Ralph. Angels’ Town: Chero Ways, Gang Life, and Rhetorics of the Everyday. Beacon P 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Clark Suzanne, and Ede Lisa. “Collaboration, Resistance, and the Teaching of Writing.” The Right to Literacy edited by Lunsford Andrea, et al., MLA 1990, pp 276–85.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Curl Jennifer Eileen. In Their Own Words: Acknowledging Heritage Literacies and Languages with College-Bound English Language Learners in Advanced English Language Arts Classrooms. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
15. DeStigter Todd. Reflections of a Citizen Teacher: Literacy, Democracy, and the Forgotten Students of Addison High. National Council of Teachers of English 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dippre Ryan J., and Phillips Talinn editors Approaches to Lifespan Writing Research: Generating an Actionable Coherence. UP of Colorado 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Domínguez Barajas Elías. “Crafting a Composition Pedagogy with Latino Students in Mind.” Composition Studies, vol. 45, no. 2 2017, pp 216–18.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Domínguez Barajas Elías. The Function of Proverbs in Discourse: The Case of a Mexican Transnational Social Network. De Gruyter Mouton 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Domínguez Barajas Elías. “Parallels in Academic and Non-Academic Discursive Styles: An Analysis of a Mexican Woman’s Narrative Performance.” Written Communication, vol. 24, no. 2 2007, pp 140–67.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Enoch Jessica, and Bessette Jean. “Meaningful Engagements: Feminist Historiography and the Digital Humanities.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 64, no. 4 2013, pp 634–60.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Enríquez-Loya Aydé. “Interrogating Ghosts in the Writing Classroom: Decolonial Storytelling Strategies for FYC Bilingual Students.” Conference on College Composition and Communication, March 2017, Portland, Oregon. Conference Presentation.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Enríquez-Loya Aydé, and Leon Kendall. “Chicanx/Latinx Rhetorics as Methodology for Writing Program Design at HSIs.” Composition Studies, vol. 45, no. 2 2017, pp 212–15.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Farr Marcia. “Essayist Literacy and Other Verbal Performances.” Written Communication, vol. 10, no. 1 1993, pp 4–38.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Farr Marcia. Latino Language and Literacy in Ethnolinguistic Chicago. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Farr Marcia. Rancheros in Chicagoacán: Language and Identity in a Transnational Community. U of Texas P 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fluitt-Dupuy Jan. “Publishing a Newsletter: Making Composition Classes More Meaningful.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 40, no. 2 1989, pp 219–23.
    [Google Scholar]
27. García Canclini Néstor. Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity Translated by Chiappari Christopher L. and López Silvia L., U of Minnesota P 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Geertz Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books 1973.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Guerra Juan C. Close to Home: Oral and Literate Practices in a Transnational Mexicano Community. Teachers College P 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Guerra Juan C. “Cultivating Transcultural Citizenship: A Writing Across Communities Model.” Language Arts, vol. 85, no. 4 2008, pp 296–304.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Guerra Juan C. “Emerging Representations, Situated Literacies, and the Practice of Transcultural Repositioning.” Latino/a Discourses: On Language, Identity & Literacy Education edited by Kells Michelle Hall, et al., Boynton/Cook Publishers 2004, pp 7–23.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hall Kells Michelle. “Linguistic Contact Zone in the College Writing Classroom: An Examination of Ethnolinguistic Identity and Language Attitudes.” Written Communication, vol. 19, no. 1 2002, pp 5–43.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hall Kells Michelle, et al. editors Latino/a Discourses: On Language, Identity & Literacy Education. Boynton/Cook Publishers 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Heath Shirley Brice. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge UP 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Heath Shirley Brice, and Street Brian V.. On Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research. Teachers College P 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Horner Bruce, et al. “Opinion: Language Difference in Writing: Toward a Translingual Approach.” College English, vol. 73, no. 3 2011, p 303–21.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Howe Michael J.A. “Using Students’ Notes to Examine the Role of the Individual Learner in Acquiring Meaningful Subject Matter.” Journal of Educational Research, vol. 64, no. 2 1970, pp 61–63.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ibarra Robert A. Beyond Affirmative Action: Reframing the Context of Higher Education. U of Wisconsin P 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Institute of Education Sciences. “Fast Facts: Degrees Conferred by Race/Ethnicity and Sex.” National Center for Education Statistics, June 2020 https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=72. Accessed 25 Jan. 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Khadka Santosh. “(Teaching) Essayist Literacy in the Multimedia World.” Composition Forum, vol. 32, Fall 2015, https://compositionforum.com/issue/32/essayist-literacy.php. Accessed 25  Jan. 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kirklighter Cristina, et al. ?editors Teaching Writing with Latino/a Students: Lessons Learned at Hispanic-Serving Institutions. State U of New York P 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Klausman Jeffrey. “Resurrecting the I-Search: Engaging Students in Meaningful Scholarship.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 35, no. 2 2007, pp 191–96.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kogen Myra. “The Conventions of Expository Writing.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol. 5, no. 1 1986, pp 24–37.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kynard Carmen. “‘Y’all Are Killin’ Me Up in Here’: Response Theory from a Newjack Composition Instructor/ SistahGurl Meeting Her Students on the Page.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 33, no. 4 2006, pp 361–87.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lillis Teresa. “Essayist Literacy, Gender, and Desire.” Student Writing, Routledge 2001, pp 119–43.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lillis Teresa. “Introduction: Mapping the Traditions of a Social Perspective on Language and Literacy.” Language, Literacy and Education: A Reader edited by Goodman Sharon et al., Trentham Books 2003, pp xiii–xxii.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Mattern Krista D., et al. “Identification of Multiple Nonreturner Profiles to Inform the Development of Targeted College Retention Interventions.” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 17, no. 1 2015, pp 18–43.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Meece Judith L., et al. “Students’ Goal Orientations and Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Activities.” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 80, no. 4 1988, pp 514–23.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mejía Jaime Armin. “Latina and Latino Rhetorical Issues.” Rhetoric, the Polis, and the Global Village: Selected Papers from the 1998 Thirtieth Anniversary Rhetoric Society of America Conference edited by Swearingen C. Jan and Pruett Dave, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1999, pp 15–17.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Mendez Newman Beatrice. “Centering in the Borderlands: Lessons from Hispanic Student Writers.” Writing Center Journal, vol. 23, no. 2 2003, pp 43–62.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Mendez Newman Beatrice, and García Romeo. “Teaching with Bordered Writers: Reconstructing Narratives of Difference, Mobility, and Translingualism.” Bordered Writers: Latinx Identities and Literacy Practices at Hispanic-Serving Institutions edited by Baca Isabel, et al., State U of New York P 2019, pp 125–46.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Miller James E. “The Linguistic Imagination.” College English, vol. 31, no. 7 1970, pp 725–32.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Nickoson Lee, and Sheridan Mary P. editors Writing Studies Research in Practice: Methods and Methodologies. Southern Illinois UP 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Oboler Suzanne. Ethnic Labels, Latino Lives: Identity and the Politics of (Re) Presentation in the United States. U of Minnesota P 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Oldenburg Ray. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. Da Capo P 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Otheguy Ricardo. “Foreword.” Translanguaging with Multilingual Students: Learning from Classroom Moments edited by García Ofelia and Kleyn Tatyana, Routledge 2016, pp ix–xii.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Penrod Diane editor Miss Grundy Doesn’t Teach Here Anymore: Popular Culture and the Composition Classroom. Boynton/Cook 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Pike Kenneth L. “Etic and Emic Standpoints for the Description of Behavior.” Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. De Gruyter Mouton 1967, pp 37–72.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Powell Pegeen R. “Retention and Writing Instruction: Implications for Access and Pedagogy.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 60, no. 4 2009, pp 664–82.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Pratt Mary Louise. “Arts of the Contact Zone.” Profession, vol. 1, no. 1 1991, pp 33–40.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Pratt Mary Louise. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. Routledge 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Purcell-Gates Victoria, et al. “Analyzing Literacy Practice: Grounded Theory to Model.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 45, no. 4 2011, pp 439–58.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Rose Shirley K., and Weiser Irwin. Going Public: What Writing Programs Learn from Engagement. Utah State UP 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Ruecker Todd. “Retention and Persistence in Writing Programs: A Survey of Students Repeating First-Year Writing.” Composition Forum, vol., 46, Spring 2021, http://compositionforum.com/issue/46/retention.php. Accessed 25 Jan. 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Ruiz Iris D. Reclaiming Composition for Chicano/as and Other Ethnic Minorities: A Critical History and Pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Ruiz Iris D., and Sánchez Raúl editors Decolonizing Rhetoric and Composition Studies: New Latinx Keywords for Theory and Pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Sánchez Yemin, et al. “Familismo Teaching: A Pedagogy for Promoting Student Motivation and College Success.” Bordered Writers: Latinx Identities and Literacy Practices at Hispanic-Serving Institutions edited by Baca Isabel, et al., State U of New York P 2019, pp 105–24.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Scollon Ronald, and Scollon Suzanne B. K.. Narrative, Literacy, and Face in Interethnic Communication. Ablex 1981.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Severino Carol. “‘We Are Not All the Same’: Latino Students, HispanicServing Institutions, and the Need to Reform Rhetoric and Composition.” Review of Teaching Writing with Latino/a Students: Lessons Learned at Hispanic-Serving Institutions by Kirklighter Cristina et al. College Composition and Communication, vol. 60, no. 4 2009, pp W137–W145.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Street Brian V. Cross-Cultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge UP 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Street Brian V. “Multiple Literacies and Multi-Literacies.” The SAGE Handbook of Writing Development edited by Beard Roger, et al., Sage 2009, pp 137–50.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Szwed John F. “The Ethnography of Literacy.” Writing: The Nature, Development, and Teaching of Written Communication edited by Whiteman Marcia Farr, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1981, pp 13–23.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Torgerson William J. “Learning to Surf the Sea of Conversation: A Way into Meaningful Research.” Journal of Teaching Writing, vol. 26, no. 2 2011, pp 85–104.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Tracy Sarah J. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. 2nd ed., Wiley Blackwell 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Trimbur John. “Essayist Literacy and the Rhetoric of Deproduction.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 9, no. 1 1990, pp 72–86.
    [Google Scholar]
76. US Census Bureau. 2020 U.S. Census (P.L. 94-171) Redistricting Data Summary; Legacy Data Files Released 12AUG2021. https://www2.census.gov/programssurveys/decennial/2020/data/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/Arkansas.
    [Google Scholar]
77. US Census Bureau. Census, QuickFacts, Bentonville City, Arkansas, 2010 Census with Updated Population Estimates. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/bentonvillecityarkansas.
    [Google Scholar]
78. US Census Bureau. Census, QuickFacts, Fayetteville City, Arkansas, 2010 Census with Updated Population Estimates. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fayettevillecityarkansas.
    [Google Scholar]
79. US Census Bureau. Census, QuickFacts, Rogers City, Arkansas, 2010 Census with Updated Population Estimates. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/rogerscityarkansas.
    [Google Scholar]
80. US Census Bureau. Census, QuickFacts, Siloam Springs, Arkansas, 2010 Census with Updated Population Estimates. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/siloamspringscityarkansas.
    [Google Scholar]
81. US Census Bureau. Census, QuickFacts, Springdale City, Arkansas, 2010 Census with Updated Population Estimates. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/springdalecityarkansas.
    [Google Scholar]
82. US Census Bureau. 2010 Census of Population and Housing: Arkansas: 2010 Summary Population and Housing Characteristics, CPH-1-5. US Government Printing Office 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Vaughn Margaret. “What Is Student Agency and Why Is It Needed Now More than Ever?” Theory into Practice, vol. 59, no. 2 2020, pp 109–18.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Wilson Nancy, et al. “El Ensayo: Latinxs Writing about Writing.” Next Steps: New Directions for/in Writing about Writing edited by Bird Barbara, et al., Utah State UP 2019, pp 87–96.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Yancey Kathleen B., et al. “The Teaching for Transfer Curriculum: The Role of Concurrent Transfer and Inside- and Outside-School Contexts in Support-ing Students’ Writing Development.”, College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 2 2019, pp 268–95.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Yancey Kathleen B., et al.Writing Across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing. Utah State UP 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Zentella Ana Celia. Building on Strength: Language and Literacy in Latino Families and Communities. Teachers College P 2005.
    [Google Scholar]