oa Editors’ Introduction: Gatekeeping, Complexity, and Connection

References

1. Blewett Kelly, et al. “Editing as Inclusion Activism.” College English, vol. 81, no. 4 2019, p 273–96. National Council of Teachers of English, https://doi.org/10.58680/ce201930081.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Burke Kenneth. “Definition of Man.” The Hudson Review, vol. 16, no. 4 1963–1964, pp 491–514.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cagle Lauren E., et al. “Anti-Racist Scholarly Reviewing Practices: A Heuristic for Editors, Reviewers, and Authors” 2021 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lZmZqeNNnYfYgmTKSbL2ijYbR4OMovv6A-bDwJRnwx8/edit?usp=sharing.
4. “CCC Submission Guidelines.” National Council of Teachers of English, https://publicationsncte.org/content/journals/ccc?page=submit-a-paper. Accessed 5 Apr 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
5. “Constitution of the Conference on College Composition and Communication of the National Council of Teachers of English.” Conference on College Composition and Communication, Feb 2023 https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/about/constitution. Accessed Mar. 1, 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
6. D’Agostino Mario A. “‘Trust the Process’:Dissertation Gatekeeping, Failure, and Graduate Student Writing.” If at First You Don’t Succeed? Writing, Rhetoric, and the Question of Failure edited by In Corbett Steven J., The WAC Clearinghouse / UP of Colorado 2024, pp 215–21. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2024.2494.2.18.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Edwards Mike, and Reyman Jessica. “Open Access and the Economics of Scholarship in Rhetoric and Composition Studies.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 37, no. 2 2018, pp 212–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2018.1424480.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gallagher John R. and Nicole DeVoss Dànielle editors Explanation Points: Publishing in Rhetoric and Composition. UP of Colorado 2019 https://upcolorado.com/utah-state-university-press/item/3701-explanation-points.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gallagher John R., et al. “Analyses of Seven Writing Studies Journals, 2000–2019, Part I: Statistical Trends in References Cited and Lexical Diversity.” Computers and Composition, vol. 67 2023 Science Direct, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102755.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gallagher John R., et al. “Analyses of Seven Writing Studies Journals, 2000–2019, Part II: Data-Driven Identification of Keywords.” Computers and Composition, vol. 67 2023 Science Direct, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102756.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Giberson Greg, et al. editors Behind the Curtain of Scholarly Publishing: Editors in Writing Studies. UP of Colorado 2022 https://doi.org/10.7330/9781646422173.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jones Natasha N. “Citation Practices: Shifting Paradigms.” Open Words: Access and English Studies, vol. 13, no. 1 2021, pp 142–52. doi:10.37514/OPWJ.2021.13.1.11.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Marsh Valerie L. “Portal and Gatekeeper: How Peer Feedback Functions in a High School Writing Class.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 53, no. 2 2018, 149–72. National Council of Teachers of English, https://publicationsncte.org/content/journals/10.58680/rte201829865.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Medina Cruz. “Decolonial Potential in a Multilingual FYC.” Composition Studies, vol. 47, no. 1 2019, pp 73–94. https://compositionstudiesjournal.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/medina.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Moore Kristen R., et al. “Afterword: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion through Citational Practice.” Keywords in Technical and Professional Communication edited by Yu Han and Buehl Jonathan, The WAC Clearinghouse / UP of Colorado 2023, pp 327–34. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/tpc/afterword.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Politzer-Ahles Stephen, et al. “Preliminary Evidence of Linguistic Bias in Academic Reviewing.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 47 2020 Science Direct, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100895.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sano-Franchini Jennifer, et al. Position Statement on Citation Justice in Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies. Nov 2022 Conference on College Composition and Communication, https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/citation-justice.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Shoemaker Pamela J., and Vos Timothy. Gatekeeping Theory. Routledge 2009 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Summers Sarah. “Developing Translingual Dispositions to Negotiate Gatekeeping in the Graduate Writing Center.” Translingual Dispositions: Globalized Approaches to the Teaching of Writing edited by Frost Alanna et al., the WAC Clearinghouse / UP of Colorado 2020, pp 249–68. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/translingual/dispositions.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Wittstock Stacy. “Gatekeeping by Design: The Use of an Exit Exam as a ‘Boss Text’ in a Basic Writing Course.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol. 41, nos. 1–2 2022, pp 40–75. https://doi.org/10.37514/JBW-J.2022.41.1.03.
    [Google Scholar]