Our Responsibility to Graduate Student Writers

References

1. Bawarshi Anis. Genre and the Invention of the Writer: Reconsidering the Place of Invention in Composition. Utah State UP 2003.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brooks-Gillies Marilee et al. Graduate Writing Across the Disciplines: Identifying, Teaching, and Supporting. WAC Clearinghouse, UP of Colorado 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brown Stuart C. et al. “The Arrival of Rhetoric in the Twenty-First Century: The 1999 Survey of Doctoral Programs in Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 18, no. 2 2000, pp 233–42.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brown Stuart C. et al. “Doctoral Programs in Rhetoric and Composition: A Catalog of the Profession.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 12, no. 2 1994, pp 240–51; 253–389.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brown Stuart C. et al. “Portrait of the Profession: The 2007 Survey of Doctoral Programs in Rhetoric and Composition.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 27, no. 4 2008, pp 331–40.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Carlo Rosanne, and Enos Theresa Jarnagin. “Back-Tracking and Forward-Gazing: Marking the Dimensions of Graduate Core Curricula in Rhetoric and Composition.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 30, no. 2 2011, pp 208–27.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chapman David W., and Tate Gary. “A Survey of Doctoral Programs in Rhetoric and Composition.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 5, no. 2 1987, pp 124–86.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Conference on College Composition and Communication. CCCC Statement on White Language Supremacy. National Council of Teachers of English, June 2021, https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/white-language-supremacy.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Crowley Sharon. Composition in the University: Historical and Polemical Essays. U of Pittsburgh P 1998.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Enoch Jessica. “Resisting the Script of Indian Education: Zitkala Ša and the Carlisle Indian School.” College English, vol. 65, no. 2 2002, pp 117–41.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Freadman Anne. “Anyone for Tennis?” Genre in the New Rhetoric, edited by Freedman Aviva and Medway Peter, Routledge 1994, pp 37–56.
    [Google Scholar]
12. García Romeo, and Baca Damián. Rhetorics Elsewhere and Otherwise: Contested Modernities, Decolonial Visions. National Council of Teachers of English 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gere Anne Ruggles et al. “Communal Justicing: Writing Assessment. Disciplinary Infrastructure, and the Case for Critical Language Awareness.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 72, no. 3 2021, pp 384–412.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Graff Gerald, and Birkenstein Cathy, They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing. Norton 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Harris Joseph. A Teaching Subject: Composition Since 1966, New Edition. UP of Colorado 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Inoue Asao B. “How Do We Language So People Stop Killing Each Other, or What Do We Do about White Language Supremacy?” College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 2 2019, pp 352–69.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lauer Janice M. “Composition Studies: Dappled Discipline.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 3, no. 1 1984, pp 20–29.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lutkewitte Claire et al. Stories of Becoming: Demystifying the Professoriate for Graduate Students in Composition and Rhetoric. UP of Colorado 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
19. McComiskey Bruce. Microhistories of Composition. Utah State UP 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mead W.E. “The Graduate Study of Rhetoric.” PMLA, vol. 15 1900, pp xix–xxxii.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mead W.E. “Reports of the Pedagogical Section.” PMLA, vol. 16 1901, pp xix–xxxii.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Micciche Laura R., and Carr Allison D. “Toward Graduate-Level Writing Instruction.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 62, no. 3 2011, pp 477–501.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Miller Carolyn R. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 70 1984, pp 151–67.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Miller Carolyn R. et al. “Genre: Permanence and Change.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3 2018, pp 269–77.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Miller Scott et al. “Present Perfect and Future Imperfect: Results of a National Survey of Graduate Students in Rhetoric and Composition Programs.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 48, no. 3 1997, 392–409.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Muñoz Zakery R. “Showing Up: Una Manera sobre Writing Process.” Beyond Productivity: Embodied, Situated, and (Un)Balanced Faculty Writing Processes edited by Owens Kim Hensley and Ittersum Derek Van, Utah State UP 2023, pp 124–41.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Peirce Karen P., and Enos Theresa Jarnagin. “How Seriously Are We Taking Professionalization? A Report on Graduate Curricula in Rhetoric and Composition.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 25, no. 2 2006, pp 204–10.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Phelps Louise Wetherbee. “Generation(al) Matters: Story, Lens, and Tone.” Composition Studies, vol. 50, no. 1 2022, pp 106–26.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Phelps Louise Wetherbee. “Reproducing Composition and Rhetoric: The Intellectual Challenge of Doctoral Education.” Composition Studies, vol. 23, no. 2 1995, pp 115–32.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Prior Paul. Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Routledge 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Schryer Catherine F. “Records as Genre.” Written Communication, vol. 10, no. 2 1993, 200–34.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Simpson Steve. “The Problem of Graduate-Level Writing Support: Building a Cross-Campus Graduate Writing Initiative.” Writing Program Administration, vol. 36, no. 1 2012, pp 95–118.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Söderlund Lars, and Wells Jaclyn, “A Study of the Practices and Responsibilities of Scholarly Peer Review in Rhetoric and Composition.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 1 2019, pp 117–44.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sullivan Patricia A. “Writing in the Graduate Curriculum: Literary Criticism as Composition.” Journal of Advanced Composition, vol. 11, no. 2 1991, pp 283–99.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Tulley Christine. How Writing Faculty Write: Strategies for Process, Product, and Productivity. Utah State UP 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wells Jaclyn M., and Söderlund Lars. “Preparing Graduate Students for Academic Publishing.” Pedagogy, vol. 18, no. 1 2018, pp 131–56.
    [Google Scholar]
37. White Louellyn. “Who Gets to Tell the Stories? Carlisle Indian School: Imagining a Place of Memory Through Descendant Voices.” Journal of American Indian Education, vol. 57, no. 1 2018, pp 122–44.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wilson Shawn. Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Fernwood Publishing 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Yagelski Robert P. Writing as a Way of Being: Writing Instruction, Nonduality, and the Crisis of Sustainability. Hampton P 2011.
    [Google Scholar]